Re: looking for kernel hacking info

2000-11-14 Thread visi0n
The THC have a documentation about freebsd kernel space. packetstorm.securify.com/groups/thc/bsdkern.htm === visi0n AUX Technologies [www.aux-tech.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

libexec directory error ?

2000-11-14 Thread visi0n
x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppi0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port plip0: on ppbus0 ad0: 516MB [1049/16/63

ProcFS

2000-04-03 Thread visi0n
I was thinking how normal programs get info about cpu and memory utilization in bsd's systems, (maybe sysctl ?). === visi0n AUX Technologies [www.aux-tech.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

RE: The stack size for a process?

2000-01-18 Thread visi0n
Where i can get info about it ? === visi0n AUX Technologies [www.aux-tech.org] On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Charles Randall wrote: > From: Jason Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Thread stacks have a def

Re: sk_buff vs mbuf

1999-12-22 Thread visi0n
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wr > ote: > > > > > Is there someone closer to a linux box, tell me if sk_buff is more > >fast than mbuf. I was reading these codes but I can't figure out the final > >result. > > I have a Linux syste

sk_buff vs mbuf

1999-12-21 Thread visi0n
Is there someone closer to a linux box, tell me if sk_buff is more fast than mbuf. I was reading these codes but I can't figure out the final result. === visi0n AUX Technologies [www.aux-tech.org]

Isa Ether Devices (ne2000)

1999-10-12 Thread visi0n
sa card. Thanx === visi0n AUX Technologies www.aux-tech.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message