In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It does exactly what you say you want it to do. The sequence goes
> > something like this:
>
> Awesome! Thanks; I knew I should have just asked you in the
> first place. :)
One caveat (ok, two caveats): it doesn't c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ronald G Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, FengYue wrote:
>
> > It seems that mmap on /dev/zero is more portable.
>
> no really, It won't work at all correctly on linux, and on Tru64 it does
> the totally wrong thing, but the (fd = -1, MAP_
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that we can do a lot with cvsupd. I've used cvsupd to grab
> > binaries on an experimental basis and it seems to work great. I've
>
> Hmmm. Does cvsupd also move a target out of the way if it already
> exist
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +typedef struct { volatile int a; } atomic_t;
> +
> +#define atomic_init(p, v)do { p->a = v; } while(0)
> +#define atomic_destroy(p)do { ; } while(0)
I don't see the need for the do ... while(0) construct he
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an ObjC shared object compiled in this way:
>
> gcc -shared -rdynamic -o Bundle BreakTest.o SetTestCase.o -lSenFoundation
>-lSenTestingKit
>
> When I load this object with dlopen() the __objc_exec_class() initializer
> of the
5 matches
Mail list logo