On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:41:30 + Frank Mitchell wrote:
> MEMORY LOCKING:
>
> Recompiling my root-privileged program, I get a System Call failure
> for:
>
> mlockall(MCL_CURRENT);
>
> errno says: "Resource temporarily unavailable"
how much memory is installed?
> But mlock(); works.
... and how
* Pawel Jakub Dawidek:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 07:20:26PM +0200, clemens fischer wrote:
> +> > We are proudly announce that CerbNG-1.0 Release Candidate 2 is now
> +> > avaliable.
> +>
> +> congratulations! may i suggest to always include the CVS tag of an
* Pawel Jakub Dawidek:
> We are proudly announce that CerbNG-1.0 Release Candidate 2 is now
> avaliable.
congratulations! may i suggest to always include the CVS tag of any
release announced here? i just tried to make(1) the CVS HEAD on my
freebsd-4.8, but this failed the compilation.
clemen
Bogdan TARU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > I am having a real weird problem with a newly installed Dell PowerEdge
>> > 2650 which acts as a web (Apache) and mail server(Procmail). The load just
>> > 'spikes' sometimes (to 40.00 or so), but immediately starts to go down.
>> Also, look in your apache a
Yury Tarasievich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ...then, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
>> A better approach might be to simply fob it
>> off on the user, i.e.,
>>
>> # pkg_install foo-1.5
>> Warning: foo-1.5 requires bar-2.3, you have bar-1.7 installed.
>> Proceed? [Y/n]
i think this is the best approach.
> In
[cc's deleted]
Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Slashdot as a source of information, heh :)
actually i never read slashdot, but it was mentioned that the
freebsd-core members had issued a full public statement on this case,
which i still cannot find anywhere. so i had to resort to whatever
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Note that many people have older browsers: the older the browser,
> the smaller the number of signing authorities they will recognize
> by default. Keep this in mind when picking browsers to examine.
>
> As a general comment, VeriSign does this as well, and te
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/rules.html
sorry to insist, but even after following all the links in the
slashdot-story this isn't clear to me. was it really about the
ipfw-hack he proposed? there were eight (or so) emails
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[about removing matt d. committer bit]
> If so, tell me now, please, what kind of reasons left, that can't be
> shown in public forum?
i'd be satisfied with the reasons that _can be_ shown in a public
forum, because anything else can't be but personal and
Yury Tarasievich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to see in dependencies not only like "was built with
> -1.9_2abc, so wants it", but also something like -1.5+ (obviously
> 1.5.0 and newer), -* (any version will do). Perhaps something else. At
> least to have possibility of specifying that, if this
Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I happen to be updating my system tonight, so when it came to the
> mergemaster step I first modified the script. I added:
> -I '$FreeBSD:.*$'
> to the 'diff ${DIFF_FLAG}' command in diff_loop, and it seems to have
> worked the way I wanted it to w
Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I happen to be updating my system tonight, so when it came to the
> mergemaster step I first modified the script. I added:
> -I '$FreeBSD:.*$'
> to the 'diff ${DIFF_FLAG}' command in diff_loop, and it seems to have
> worked the way I wanted it to w
12 matches
Mail list logo