On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 06:09, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > * jasaorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 04:59]:
> > Getting the Kylix IDE to function on FreeBSD has been one of the ongoing
> > hair-pulling tasks I undertake every few months. The installer alone is
> > a pain in the ass, since it performs
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 13:44, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "M. Warner Losh" wrote:
> > Rewind units on tape drives? If there's no access check done, and I
> > open the rewind unit as joe-smoe? The close code is what does the
> > rewind, and you don't have enough knowledge to know if the tape was
> > ope
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 13:39, Terry Lambert wrote:
> andi payn wrote:
> > Now hold on. The standard (by which I you mean POSIX? or one of the UNIX
[...]
> A strictly conforming implementation can not expose things into
> the namespace that are not defined by the standard to be in
ng able to kqueue-monitor any vnode you can stat) also still sounds
like a good one to me. However, if nobody agrees, I'll drop it.
Meanwhile:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 13:29, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 12:02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:27, David Malone wrote:
> : > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:46:38AM -0800, andi payn wrote:
> : > >
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 01:44, Terry Lambert wrote:
> andi payn wrote:
> > First, some background: On Irix and Linux, fam works by asking the
> > kernel to send it a signal whenever the specified accesses occur. On
> > FreeBSD, since there is no imon interface and no dnotify
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 22:33, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:54:07AM -0800, andi payn typed:
>
> [...]
>
> > * I think (but I'm not sure) that kevent doesn't notify at all if the
> > only change to a file is its ATIME. If I'm right, this
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:27, David Malone wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:46:38AM -0800, andi payn wrote:
> > In FreeBSD, this doesn't work; you just get EINVAL.
>
> I believe this is because of a security problem discovered a few
> years ago, where you could open
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 01:19, Terry Lambert wrote:
> andi payn wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, FreeBSD doesn't have anything equivalent to
> > linux's O_NOACCESS (which is not in any of the standard headers, but
> > it's equal to O_WRONLY | O_RDWR, or O_ACCMODE
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 07:46, andi payn wrote:
> As far as I can tell, FreeBSD doesn't have anything equivalent to
> linux's O_NOACCESS (which is not in any of the standard headers, but
> it's equal to O_WRONLY | O_RDWR, or O_ACCMODE). In linux, this can be
> used to s
First, let me mention that I'm not nearly as experienced coding for *BSD
as for linux, so I may ask some stupid questions.
I've been looking at the fam port, and this has brought up a whole slew
of questions. I'm not sure if all of them are appropriate to this list,
but I don't know who else to as
As far as I can tell, FreeBSD doesn't have anything equivalent to
linux's O_NOACCESS (which is not in any of the standard headers, but
it's equal to O_WRONLY | O_RDWR, or O_ACCMODE). In linux, this can be
used to say, "give me an fd for this file, but don't try to open it for
reading or writing or
12 matches
Mail list logo
