On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, John Regehr wrote:
> > > Have you tried benchmarking process to process context switch times to see
> > > if the results are similar?
>
> No, that's a good idea. My infrastructure isn't set up to support
> processes, though, so it'll take a little time.
I'd be surprised if
131039 rev=0xd0
>hdr=0x00
Mine does UDMA66 as well, but haven't checked 100 (no ATA4 disks), looks
similar to Richard's
atapci0@pci0:0:1: class=0x010180 card=0x55131039 chip=0x55131039 rev=0xd0
hdr=0x00
Cheers,
Zwane Mwaikambo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
drive geometry problem.
Regards,
Zwane Mwaikambo
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 1 03:22:15 GMT
k: Seagate 3.2G ATA2
I'm willing to test any patches.
Regards,
Zwane Mwaikambo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
63
no LBA in BIOS and 6296/128/63
The drive manufacturer has 6296/128/63 on the drive.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I currently boot with a
small drive (1.2G) and the 3.2 on the secondary channel with
(6296/16/63 and LBA)
Regards,
Zwane Mwaikambo
Note. I have the same
?
Thanks.
Zwane Mwaikambo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> Well, I'll bet your system time has drifted about a second or four in
> those two days.
When you say system time do you mean "hardware" time? or the running
kernel's time? The hardware time doesn't work anyway since the box's RTC
is stuck somewhere in 20
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> Yes. Almost *ALL* PCs in the field aren't exactly 11931282Hz.
> There's a lot of variance in this. PC have such crappy oscillators
> that calibration is required. The "slight" variation can be as large
> as +-300Hz, which is huge. :-(.
>
> But I'm a li
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> The higher levels of NetBSD does this if you are running ntpd. Ditto
> Linux.
Thanks for the pointer, i'm going to check out the NTP stuff in both OS'
just now.
> I measure phase differences in oscelators to sub-pico second level in
> my day job :-).
greatly appreciated
Thanks in advance,
Zwane Mwaikambo
Please CC me as i'm not on the list.
Patch - add a "rtc_is_broken" variable NB. I've tried not to be too
intrusive here and only added the rtc_is_broken check where it affects
this specifc case. Diffed against
10 matches
Mail list logo
