While looking at Linux 2.4 code, I see the kiobuf stuff. They implement it
because Linux 2.2 lacks raw device support. I am wondering whether
FreeBSD has a similar mechanism already in place. My reasonings:
(1) FreeBSD's buffer is variable sized while Linux's buffer is fixed
sized. So in the ca
Is it possible to create a no-password account? Is it possible to record
in a file the times of each reboots? If so, how to do this? Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I tried to obtain a list of vnodes in the system. The command pstat -v no
longer works. Is there any way to achieve this or hack the code a little
bit to achieve this? Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the messa
Is there a way to specify a kernel other than /kernel to boot from? I do
not want to do this manually, I want to put it into some configuration
file. Thanks,
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I am wondering why FreeBSD has fixed number of buffer headers (nbuf) while
Linux can grow the number of buffer headers on the fly. In FreeBSD, we
have a lofreebuffers count. I think this is a reserve for avoiding
deadlock when the buffer headers are low. But Linux does not seem to have
such a c
I am debugging a kernel. Since a kernel is consisted of many files, how
can I load a specific file into gdb, browse it, and set a break point at
some line within that file? Right now, I can only view the file whose
statements are being executed. Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
t; In article <Pine.SOL.4.21.010008490.22923-10@jade>, Zhiui
> Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Although the 4.4 BSD design and implementation book says the text
> > part of a process starts from 0x,, it actually starts from
> > some place around 0x
Although the 4.4 BSD design and implementation book says the text part of
a process starts from 0x,, it actually starts from some place
around 0x800, (or 0x8048000 to be exact). What's in the area between 0
- 0x800,? Why do we not use it if it is left empty as shown by
/proc/pid/m
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Doug White wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> > I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
> > runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
> > to attach to the proc
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is executing
(with remote debugging or ddb)?
Thanks for your help.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscr
Your patch works for me on FreeBSD 4.2-Release. Thanks.
-Zhihui
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Brian Dean wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 03:30:51PM -0500, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
> > Thanks. I tried this on FreeBSD 4.2-Release (because I do not have a
> > stable or current), but I failed:
Thanks. I tried this on FreeBSD 4.2-Release (because I do not have a
stable or current), but I failed:
# make
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb
cc: ../libbfd/libbfd.a: No such file or directory
cc: ../libopcodes/libopcodes.a: No such file or
I tried remote debugging on FreeBSD 4.2 this morning. Everything was
fine, except that I saw the following messages:
(gdb) step
ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
ptrace(PT_GETDBREGS) failed: No such process
201 cred = p ? p->p_
I am new to SMP subject and have some questions to ask:
Is the simplelock() really needed since FreeBSD is using the big giant
lock and the kernel is non preemptive? Or has FreeBSD changed the big
giant lock and made kernel thread preemptive? Uresha Vahalia talks about
Lost Wakeup Problem (page
I understand that memory belonged to a buffer will not be paged out by VM
daemon. Now I want protect that memory from being cleaned by VM daemon as
well. Should I use vfs_busy_pages() or just assume that since my pages are
on the active queue, VM daemon will not touch it (it only cleans pages on
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <Pine.SOL.4.21.0011031156050.29568-10@jade>, Zhiui Zhang writes:
> >
> >The manual says the granularity of gettimeofday() is hardware dependent.
> >The time may be updated continuously or in clock ticks.
The manual says the granularity of gettimeofday() is hardware dependent.
The time may be updated continuously or in clock ticks. Can anyone
explain for me the two different ways of updating the time? What kind of
hardware can help?
Thanks for your help.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 02-Oct-00 Zhiui Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Suppose a process is scheduled to run, will it run until its quantum ends
> > unless it calls tsleep() on his own? In other words, is it possible for a
> > process to give up its
Suppose a process is scheduled to run, will it run until its quantum ends
unless it calls tsleep() on his own? In other words, is it possible for a
process to give up its quantum earlier without having it to do so
voluntarily? Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
I am debugging a program that does a lot of disk I/O and the system hangs
briefly with the some repeated messages that looks like:
(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x0 - Timed out in Data-in phase, SEQADDR==0x88
(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): BDR message in message buffer
(da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x0 - Timed out in Data-i
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
> I am wondering whether there is a good reason for not putting FreeBSD in a
> DOS extended partition.
> >>>
> >>> Good luck booting it.
> >>
> >> Do you mean as long as I can boot it, the kernel itself has no problem
> >> with being putting into
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Doug White wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> > I am wondering whether there is a good reason for not putting FreeBSD in a
> > DOS extended partition.
>
> Good luck booting it.
Do you mean as long as I can boot it, th
I am wondering whether there is a good reason for not putting FreeBSD in a
DOS extended partition. I have installed four O.S.es on my laptop and know
that could be a limitation if FreeBSD can not be put into a DOS extended
partition. I do not see any limitations in the boot loader or kernel that
A friend asks me what will happen if more than one process trying to read
the stdin at the same time. There is no way to guarantee that any
particular keyboard input will be accepted by a particular process.
Since a system call is atomic, this makes me wonder how long it takes to
do a system cal
24 matches
Mail list logo
