On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:46:11PM -0400, Dylan Castine wrote:
> Hi,
Hi.
> My name is Dylan,
>
> I want to add support for the AES-GCM cipher to the kernel.
> I am currently using strongswan for an IPsec build and need ESP to use the
> AES-GCM algorithm.
> Any info is appreciated,
Riaan (CCed
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:36:26AM +0300, Jan Melen wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> Just to understand the problem correctly I guess you are talking about
> performance hit on outgoing packets as the IPsec tries to find a
> security policy even for packets that should not be encrypted? For
> incoming traff
Hi.
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 05:57:56AM -0800, Vasile Marii wrote:
[]
> The netperf results between the two exactly the same
> machines(with a tunnel(AES-CBC with HMAC_SHA256) between them) with
> the exactly the same driver shows a throughput of maximum
> 20Mbps(without IPSEC tunnel i can get
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 08:46:32AM -0700, alan yang wrote:
> i wonder people ran into similar issue on setkey with freebsd7 that
> panic at ~/crypto/sha1.c:263 within sha1_result()
> digest[0] = ctxt->h.b8[3]; digest[1] = ctxt->h.b8[2];
>
> on the following sadb add with setkey:
> add 19
Hi.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 03:11:05PM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> I've noticed that in the kernel configuration IPSEC_ESP disappeared
> from the options. It says that you just need device crypto and IPSEC.
>
> Does this mean that with crypto and IPSEC I have all I need to treat
> ESP like the o
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:59:35PM -0600, Z.C.B. wrote:
> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though
> about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun
> looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other people
> think in this area.
Hi.
What do
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:49:04AM +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:57:58PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote:
[fscking a RO partition]
> > Grr, I meant 4.x not 5.x, and I thought the problem started about the time
> > bg fsck was introduced...
>
> Rig
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:57:58PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:16:51PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
[fscking a RO partition]
> > I think it's broken in 5.x as well. It's fallout from GEOM IIRC, and it is
> > annoying.
>
> Grr, I meant 4.x not 5.x, and I thought the prob
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:04:07AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:41:37AM +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
> >
> > Later, if root filesystem is remounted readonly, then fsck is called,
> > it will says "NO WRITE ACCESS".
>
> mou
Hi all.
I didn't really know where to post this question, so I try
"hackers"
When rc starts, root filesystem is already mounted readonly, and fsck
runs ok, then root is remounted read/write.
Later, if root filesystem is remounted readonly, then fsck is called,
it will says "NO WRITE ACCESS
10 matches
Mail list logo
