At a first glance of this email, I thought ``An IDS based upon SpamAssassin
ideology? Intrusions differ too much from spam for this to be accurate!''
After reading your thesis, my ideas were changed.
I agree with you that this approach for IDS cannot be as accurate as
SpamAssassin is accurate w
Hello to all,
I have implemented a new type of intrusion detection system for my Master
thesis. I would like to announce this information, in case anyone would be
interested in this research.
The IDS system is designed as a kernel module for FreeBSD 5.2. It is
inspired by the SpamAssassin progr
Hello to all,
I have implemented a new type of intrusion detection system for my Master
thesis. I would like to announce this information, in case anyone would be
interested in this research.
The IDS system is designed as a kernel module for FreeBSD 5.2. It is inspired
by the SpamAssassin progr
ks it returned EFAULT.
Why?
My system is FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #5: Wed Apr 28 16:03:52 CEST 2004.
Thanks,
Tomas Pluskal
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> One workaround would be to draft volunteers... by committing it.
>
I agree ;) But I am not the one to decide..
I just hope the patch might get into 4-STABLE before everybody switches to
5.X...
Tomas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
No. According to N.Hibma, it needs more reviewing/testing, and noone had
the time to do it yet.
Tomas
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> Was this ever committed?
>
> -Guido
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Bingo! :)
When I changed the bsqh initialisation, I get speed above 400 KB/s,
that makes me feel much better :)
I am sending a corrected patch as attachment.
Tomas
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> I had a quick look at the patch - one thing I noticed is that you
> are possibly not ini
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Nick Hibma wrote:
> [pats Joe on the head] Well done!
What do you mean by this ?
> Well, the only sections that are needed are the ones that relate to
> uhci_{add,rem}_loop. Do a diff between RELENG_4 and HEAD and filter out
> the stuff that you would need to implmenet the
It seems to me that it is present in -CURRENT, isn't it ?
Tomas
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> uhci_{add,rem}_loop from
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/syssrc/sys/dev/usb/uhci.c.diff?r1=1.122&r2=1.123
>
> is probably what is needed then.
>
> Nick
>
To Unsubscribe: send mai
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> The ZIP Drive is USB as well?
No, it's ATAPI.
> Are you using a UHCI controller (dmesg)?
Yes:
uhci0: port 0xc000-0xc01f irq 11 at device
17.2 on pci0
usb0: on uhci0
uhci1: port 0xc400-0xc41f irq 11 at device
17.3 on pci0
usb1: on uhci1
Tomas
To
This is the debug output of
#dd if=/dev/da0s1c of=/tmp/data bs=65536 count=3
umass0:0:0:0:XPT_SCSI_IO: cmd: 0x25, flags: 0x40, 10b cmd/8b data/32b sense
umass0: CBW 66: cmd = 10b (0x2500...), data = 8b, dir = in
umass0: Handling BBB state 2 (BBB CBW), xfer=0xc16bca80, NORMAL_COMPLETION
um
Hello,
It seems to me that the slowness of umass driver is not caused by msdosfs.
I know about the msdosfs problems, for example when I run dd from my ZIP
drive (with FAT) with request size of 2048, it's extremely slow. When I
change request size to 64K, it gains normal speed (about 1MB/s).
But
to follow to implement clustering ?
I am ready to do the hard work :)
Thanks
Tomas Pluskal
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
sses still didn't work and there were many error
messages.
No one has posted any solution yet. I would like to help debugging this,
but I don't really know where to start...
Thanks
Tomas Pluskal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see
14 matches
Mail list logo
