'K, I'm curious here ... is this a native port, or a linux port? the
liblinuxthread.* mention here makes me think its more a linux binary
running on a FreeBSD machine, but just want to clarify ...
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Pranas Baliuka wrote:
> fyi!!!
> - Original Message -
> From
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Stefanos Kiakas wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The easiest way is to set the jail up as a file using vnconfig.
there are various software packages that will not work in a vnconfig
environment ... I tried using it, and one of the issues I hit was a
distinct lack of inodes until
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Dave Kingsley wrote:
> Good Afternoon!
> We have been trying to set up a system of jails on FreeBSD 5.0 machines.
>
> Building a jail from scratch seems to be no problem. Everything seems
> to work
>
> just fine. Here is our problem. We would like to be able to replicat
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Peter Seebach wrote:
> Yes, Dennis. We have it working. The code is in a special branch of
> the tree, which we normally don't discuss publically. I'm just
> bringing this up because I'm sick of living a lie. We are planning to
> release all the code as soon as you give up
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Dennis wrote:
>
> I really dont care to ask this on the list, but DG doesnt answer my private
> emails, so I have little choice.
>
> has any progress been made on making the if_fxp driver work with the latest
> intel NICs? Its been over 3 months since the problems creeped up,
Sorry, my fault, I should have responded back after I had tested it ...
yes, the below worked quite nicely for me *nod*
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Stefan Aeschbacher wrote:
> Hi
> what is the correct way to update the world in a jail?
> something like this?
>
> D=/path/to/jail
> cd /usr/src
> make up
well, I sent in my vote for a FreeBSD port ... if I can avoid having to
reboot into Windows so that I can use some of the win business apps, and
all for <$100, I'd be happy ...
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> I spoke to these folks at Linuxworld about 18 months ago. AFAIR, their
>
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brook Milligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In any case, if this really follows the POSIX standard, perhaps
> > PostgreSQL code should assume these semantics and work around other
> > cases that don't follow the standard (instead of work around the POSIX
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, this is interesting: on HPUX, man sysconf(2) says that
> sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) returns the max number of open files per process
> --- which is what fd.c assumes it means. But I see that on your FreeBSD
> box, the sysconf man page defines it as
>
>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> hm
>
> i mean, do the hardware people want their stuff supported or not? that's
> the main question
> some seem to choose the NOT.
right, and that is their perogative ... you can't create a "blacklist" and
publicize it, it makes us look bad, not
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 08:56:47AM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> > Can anyone give me an idea on how big a directory could be in some
> > environment?
>
> Our inn's /news/spool/control/cancel directory is almost 300k. If
> we were a significantly larg
Just to confirm...I've had similar problems, but *only* after moving to
INN-CURRENT, which makes *very* heavy use of MMAP() :(
What version of INN are you running?
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Mark Powell wrote:
>
> > I have INN v2.2 running ha
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, bush doctor wrote:
> Out of da blue Wolfram Schneider aka (wo...@cs.tu-berlin.de) said:
> > I ported pmake to SunOS 5.5.1, 5.6, and 5.7. The port based on the
> > FreeBSD-4.0-current make version from 9th September 1999.
> >
> > I successfully compiled pmake itself and the Fr
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, bush doctor wrote:
> Out of da blue Wolfram Schneider aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > I ported pmake to SunOS 5.5.1, 5.6, and 5.7. The port based on the
> > FreeBSD-4.0-current make version from 9th September 1999.
> >
> > I successfully compiled pmake itself and the FreeB
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> > > Where sun are involved, I wouldn't get your hopes up until you actually
> > > see source or something. And I wouldn't exactly call them quick,
> > > either.
> >
> > This is wise counsel.
>
> Also, don't discount the possib
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> > > Where sun are involved, I wouldn't get your hopes up until you actually
> > > see source or something. And I wouldn't exactly call them quick,
> > > either.
> >
> > This is wise counsel.
>
> Also, don't discount the possi
The neat thing is that the F5 one worked fine, its only the 'Shift F5' one so
far that isn't...
Thanks...
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Perfect, slowly putting it together. One thing that I didn't find in the
> man page, and am wondering if its
t, if I reverse it, it works as expected/hoped...
Mistake on my part, or normal?
thanks...
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
> : I need to build a keyboard map such that:
> :
> : F1 == ESC OP
> : F2 == ESC OQ
The neat thing is that the F5 one worked fine, its only the 'Shift F5' one so
far that isn't...
Thanks...
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Perfect, slowly putting it together. One thing that I didn't find in the
> man page, and am wondering if its
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:04:43 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > Hopefully this makes a bit more sense?
>
> What doesn't make sense is the fact that a FreeBSD developer, who should
> know better, is mailing this sort o
t, if I reverse it, it works as expected/hoped...
Mistake on my part, or normal?
thanks...
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Hermit Hacker writes:
> : I need to build a keyboard map such that:
> :
> : F1 == ESC
Morning...
Got a couple of suggestions, and have tried both, with the
xkeycaps appearing to be the more practical for what I'm trying to get
done, I think.
From reading the xkeycaps man page, its a frontend for xmodmap,
but reading *its* man page pretty much got me nowhere fast,
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:04:43 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > Hopefully this makes a bit more sense?
>
> What doesn't make sense is the fact that a FreeBSD developer, who should
> know better, is mailing this sort o
Morning...
Got a couple of suggestions, and have tried both, with the
xkeycaps appearing to be the more practical for what I'm trying to get
done, I think.
From reading the xkeycaps man page, its a frontend for xmodmap,
but reading *its* man page pretty much got me nowhere fast,
Beautiful...thanks :) Infocmp doesn't exist under FreeBSD, but Solaris
has it :)
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 11:50:33AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Attached is the output of 'tconv -b vt221' on our Solaris machine
Beautiful...thanks :) Infocmp doesn't exist under FreeBSD, but Solaris
has it :)
On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 11:50:33AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Attached is the output of 'tconv -b vt221' on our Solaris machine
Morning...
Last week, at work, I talked one of the guys in IS into switching
from using Win98 to using FreeBSD 3.2/X, and all has gone well so far,
except that we've hit a snag that I'm not sure how to rectify...
Under Win98, they use CRT, with a special set of keyboard map'ngs
f
Morning...
Last week, at work, I talked one of the guys in IS into switching
from using Win98 to using FreeBSD 3.2/X, and all has gone well so far,
except that we've hit a snag that I'm not sure how to rectify...
Under Win98, they use CRT, with a special set of keyboard map'ngs
28 matches
Mail list logo
