On Thursday, 13th January 2005, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
>POSIX states that the O_NONBLOCK flag is per open file description. File
>descriptors created with dup(2), fork(2) or similar methods share the
>same open file description, while new descriptors created with open(2)
>do not.
Can you quote ch
On Thursday, 13th January 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-Jan-12 23:54:38 +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
>>a) Rewrite file descriptor handling in libc_r so it does not set O_NONBLOCK
>>on tty file descriptors unless it is in the foreground. I don't know how
>>hard
Hi! I'm running FreeBSD 4.11-RC2 on an Athlon 2100+ with 768MB of ram and
software mirrored 160GB Seagate disks. All pretty straightforward so far.
I'm currently a couple of DAYS into compiling Open Office 1.1.3, and while
I can tell you all sorts of stories of trouble and woe, I want to concent
On Wednesday, 12th January 2005, Stephen McKay wrote:
>[Problems during Open Office compilation on FreeBSD 4.11-RC2]
>After some tracing, I have worked out that the tty is being alternately
>set to nonblocking and back to normal hundreds of times during the compilation
>of Open
[You may see this message twice as it got stuck in the ^$&#@ moderation queue.]
Hi! I'm running FreeBSD 4.11-RC2 on an Athlon 2100+ with 768MB of ram and
software mirrored 160GB Seagate disks. All pretty straightforward so far.
I'm currently a couple of DAYS into compiling Open Office 1.1.3, an
On Friday, 5th July 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
>This problem still persists. On my Laptop a ACCTON MiniPCI
>100Mbit card does make this output. Then I loose my network
>connection. Only a ifconfig down/up of the interface helps.
Are you running -current? I did a quick (but safe) hack in -stable
About a month ago I suggested that vfs.vmiodirenable=1 and the cd9660
file system interract badly. I have not got absolute proof, but I
think fairly good evidence of a causal link.
At work I have an Athlon 1.4GHz with 512MB ram, IDE disk, IDE burner
running FreeBSD 4.4 (no special options). For
On Sunday, 23rd September 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>Things to look out for:
>
>1. !ufs filesystems
I am irredeemably slack for not testing this a lot but...
I believe I saw bad interactions between vmiodirenable and isofs on 4.3-R.
I mounted a CD, looked at stuff on it, did a lot of othe
On Monday, 9th July 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
>Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
>>
>> I think I found the reason that my FreeBSD box is performing
>> so poorly as a NATing router. When I do an ipnat -l to see
>> what "active connections" are there on the router, a list
>> about 3 pages long (using i
On Wednesday, 6th December 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I know it addresses it. Unfortunately, I didn't understand a word of it.
> MAP_ANONMap anonymous memory not associated with any specific file.
> The file descri
On Sunday, 3rd December 2000, "G. Adam Stanislav" wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 10:12:56AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
>>Yes, you can read from your own pipe, and yes the buffering availabe in
>>the pipe is limited. IIRC, the pipe size is 8K.
>
>Thank you. In that case I'll be better off using ch
On Tuesday, 30th November 1999, Dan Nelson wrote:
>In the last episode (Nov 30), Stephen McKay said:
>> If anything, I want a 'df -m' option that does this:
>>
>>[snip]
>Just set BLOCKSIZE to your preferred unit.
>
>$ BLOCKSIZE=1M df
>
>Filesystem
On Tuesday, 30th November 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> FilesystemSize UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/da0s1a 62.0M 31.0M 26.1M54% /
> /dev/da0s1e 192M 167M 9.22M95% /usr
> /dev/da0s1d 61.4M 11.3M 45.2M20% /var
> /dev/da0s1f 288M 247M 18.4M9
On Tuesday, 12th October 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
>On Monday, 11 October 1999 at 20:39:11 -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:04:50AM +0930, a little birdie told me
>> that Greg Lehey remarked
>>>
>>> What mailer are you using? It didn't quote the "From " at the
>>> begi
On Saturday, 17th July 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>:Is there any way to force softupdate on on a mounted system, or do I have to
>:either move the / to another machine, or move a floppydrive to this machine?
>
>If you boot single-user, root will be mounted read-only and you should
>be abl
On Saturday, 17th July 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>:Is there any way to force softupdate on on a mounted system, or do I have to
>:either move the / to another machine, or move a floppydrive to this machine?
>
>If you boot single-user, root will be mounted read-only and you should
>be ab
On Monday, 14th June 1999, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>> symlinks have caused me grief (Pyramid OSx) and never joy. I hope it fails
>> yet again to appear in FreeBSD. Just think of the new security holes for a
>> start.
>
>Name one, please. You can currently point a symlink anyplace you
>like;
On Sunday, 13th June 1999, "Chuck Youse" wrote:
>Forgive my ignorance, but what exactly is meant by a "variant link", and
>what might one be used for?
Abused, not used. A number of incredibly dodgy things can be done with
symlinks that point here at one moment and there at another moment based
o
18 matches
Mail list logo
