, [Jung-uk Kim wrote:]
| On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:52 pm, Robert Watson wrote:
| > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Sharad Chandra wrote:
| > > Is it known bug or is there any workaround? How will a userland
| > > process make sure that process will not crash as malloc(3) can
| >
userland process make
sure that process will not crash as malloc(3) can allocate where ever it get
the memory free to use.
--
Thanks,
Sharad Chandra
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
, [Jeremy Chadwick wrote:]
| On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:13:13PM +0530, Sharad Chandra wrote:
| > I am getting a problem in setting em card to 1000baseTX. It shows "active
| > status" with 100baseTX but as soon as i run "ifconfig em1 media
| > 1000baseTX mediaopt f
baseT/UTP
And is it possible any how to send *jumbo packets* on this card or on bge card
(bge card is working with 1000base)? I tried nemesis tool, but i don't think
it can send bigger packets. BPF also seems to have limitaion upto 2K.
--
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
__
, [Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:]
| Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 10:10:56 schrieb Sharad Chandra:
| > So does it mean, freebsd has limitation. sleeping will only work for its
| > value more than 1 milli sec because % of +- error value is comparitivly
| > low? I am curious to know, is
, [Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:]
| Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 11:28:42 schrieb Sharad Chandra:
| > Does usleep work for you? i just saw it is implemented over nanosleep
| > which passes a struct timeval to "select".
|
| Quoting from POSIX:
|
| """
| The u
Hi,
How does dual port star fire nic card time stamp? Is the sheduling
round
robin. if it is, there can be chances, a frame comes later than other can get
lesser timestamp.
--
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
0.002480 usleep: 0.001996
0.07 => select: 0.006715 usleep: 0.001998
0.08 => select: 0.002297 usleep: 0.001662
0.09 => select: 0.002635 usleep: 0.001999
0.10 => select: 0.003717 usleep: 0.001988
--
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
___
handle it
Platform: freebsd 6.1 on amd64
--
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can't we differentiate relating to some parameter? What about transfer
rate "camcontrol inquiry da0". on SCSI its 320MB/Sec and on san its 200MB/Sec
any other parameter?
Thanks in advance
Sharad Chandra
On Friday 05 October 2007 7:46 pm, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Am 05.10.200
, whether it is regular SCSI drives or SAN.
Then we need a tool that can tell this da0 belongs to SAN/SCSI or not
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
On Thursday 04 October 2007 6:51 pm, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Sharad Chandra wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > How to distinguish if /dev/da* devi
On Friday 05 October 2007 5:25 pm, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Sharad Chandra wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 October 2007 6:51 pm, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >> Sharad Chandra wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> How to distinguish if /dev/da* devices are
m, nothing else.
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
On Friday 05 October 2007 5:19 pm, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 12:43 +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
>
>
> Excuse the formatting, my keyboard went nuts and decided I was done
> editing :o
>
> In addition to the example I show
emperature Warning Disabled or Not Supported
on SCSI device pass0 errors don't come.
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
On Friday 05 October 2007 4:46 pm, Sharad Chandra wrote:
> Yes, right by analyzing camcontrol devlist it can be told, but i guess not
> always.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
, whether it is regular SCSI drives or SAN.
Then we need a tool that can tell this da0 belongs to SAN/SCSI or not
Thanks for any suggestion.
Sharad Chandra
On Thursday 04 October 2007 6:51 pm, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Sharad Chandra wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > How to distinguish if
Hello,
How to distinguish if /dev/da* devices are internal scsi drivers or
LUNs of
external SAN?
Is there any tool?
Thanks for any advice.
Sharad Chandra
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Friday 27 Jul 2007 3:50 pm, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2007-Jul-27 15:13:48 +0530, Sharad Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am trying gcc -m32 on freebsd 6.1 amd64 env, but it does not seems to be
> >working. i also installed /usr/port/lang/linux-libgcc/ but did not
rtbld-freebsd6.1/4.2.0/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd6.1/4.2.0/libgcc.a
when searching for -lgcc
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
how can we make this working?
Thanks
Sharad Chandra
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
I got it
for those who had a look on rsh, need to modify /etc/hosts.equiv file and read
rshd man page is sufficient.
Sharad Chandra
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 6:09 pm, Sharad Chandra wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I was looking at rsh on freebsd 6.0, is it really execute commands
> I
nks
Sharad Chandra
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi all,
I was reading man page of ttyname(3). I thought if i have ttyname then using
that can i have IP address of connected host?. like in sshd logs on log file
like.
... sshd[]: Accepted keyboard-interactive/pam for
from port ssh2
This IP here is connected hosts ip..
is there any api
21 matches
Mail list logo