* Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:57:22 -0700
* From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 05:42:23PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
* > We're still waiting for 4.0's "support footprint" to widen
What do you mean by "support footprint"? If you mean graphic cards,
all we nee
* From: Jaakko Salomaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* poor in my opinion. I think we need something like this. I'll make a port
* out of this if you want, or if it's my lucky day, perhaps it should even
* be added to the base distribution (damn, I'm ambitious :-]).
* % ** ./pkg_get -i gtk **
* Curr
* From: Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* [originally sent to ports, resending to hackers at the suggestion of someone
* on that list.]
Sorry, you probably caught us at the busiest time right before the
release
* Hi Folks,
*
* I'd like to make a port for our Haskell compiler, GHC (s
* From: Simon Marlow
* [originally sent to ports, resending to hackers at the suggestion of someone
* on that list.]
Sorry, you probably caught us at the busiest time right before the
release
* Hi Folks,
*
* I'd like to make a port for our Haskell compiler, GHC (see
* http://researc
* From: Wilko Bulte
* As Chris Costello wrote ...
* >I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy
*
* No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath
Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something
so I know! ;)
-PW (W?)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord
* From: Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* As Chris Costello wrote ...
* >I don't think the local Ports Wraith would be amazingly happy
*
* No. He will turn into a Ports Wrath
Hey, if you're going to make fun of me, at least CC: me or something
so I know! ;)
-PW (W?)
To Unsubscribe:
* From: Jonathan Lemon
* What I want is a simple new readable sysctl, something like:
*
* hw.clockrate: 132
*
* I think that this would be useful both for development (how fast
* is that stupid machine down in the bunker?), and system admininstration
* (who needs a cpu
* From: Tim Vanderhoek
* differences are 1) entries in inetd.conf are sample entries only, 2)
* ports have no way of adding those entries to inetd.conf themselves
* (since touching /etc is illegal).
Uh, you're contradicting yourself. Touching /etc is not illegal.
* 2) The current system
* From: Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* What I want is a simple new readable sysctl, something like:
*
* hw.clockrate: 132
*
* I think that this would be useful both for development (how fast
* is that stupid machine down in the bunker?), and system admininstration
* From: Tim Vanderhoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* differences are 1) entries in inetd.conf are sample entries only, 2)
* ports have no way of adding those entries to inetd.conf themselves
* (since touching /etc is illegal).
Uh, you're contradicting yourself. Touching /etc is not illegal.
* 2)
* From: "Jordan K. Hubbard"
Look, we're obviously not going to convince each other with this
discussion. I'm sorry I caused you much trouble by adding it without
working it with you first, but I believe the current state is workable
for both of us. Can we leave it as it is?
* 2. Your INDEX
* From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Look, we're obviously not going to convince each other with this
discussion. I'm sorry I caused you much trouble by adding it without
working it with you first, but I believe the current state is workable
for both of us. Can we leave it as it is
* From: Tim Vanderhoek
* I can claim a bit of the responsibility. It was done after Sue Blake
* complained that there was no way to distinguish packages requiring X
* from those that didn't. I wrote some extended message discussing
* different types of dependencies, and then Satoshi wrote
* From: Tim Vanderhoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* I can claim a bit of the responsibility. It was done after Sue Blake
* complained that there was no way to distinguish packages requiring X
* from those that didn't. I wrote some extended message discussing
* different types of dependencies, and
* From: "Jordan K. Hubbard"
* Just to clear up a misconception; this isn't actually a sysinstall
* problem. This is a ports bug which Satoshi or somebody introduced
* when they added a dependency on the XFree86 port very prematurely. It
* was premature because no actual package exists for
* From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Just to clear up a misconception; this isn't actually a sysinstall
* problem. This is a ports bug which Satoshi or somebody introduced
* when they added a dependency on the XFree86 port very prematurely. It
* was premature because no actual
* From: Nick Sayer
*
* I have made a preliminary patch (hack?) to add SSL to pine (it's like
* clicking the 'server requires secure connection' box - POP or IMAP over
* SSL).
*
* The pine4 port is fairly involved. Adding my stuff is almost downright
* trivial. It amounts to adding
*
*
* From: Ladavac Marino
I don't really have time to butt in (I have to hop on a plane in a few
hours and I haven't finished the presentation slides) but I'd like to
throw in my two cents before this gets out of hand.
* [ML] This would offer an advantage over the existing system
* only if
18 matches
Mail list logo
