# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-09-27 05:39:10 -0400:
> when trying to d/l the following file
>
> 1 www www 551M Sep 16 13:23 20050818002.zip
>
> via apache1.3.33/php 4.3.11, i get that in the logs
> i thought it was because i dont have enough swap so i did
[...]
See ulimit(1), search f
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-11-12 04:11:22 +0100:
> The only real problem with having bash as /bin/sh is that people tend
> to write scripts using bash-specific features and forget that such
> scripts are not portable to systems using a less powerful /bin/sh.
Or the other way around. Bash (at l
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-10-03 02:02:26 +0300:
> On 2004-10-02 17:22, Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 8:57 PM +0300 10/2/04, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > >On 2004-10-02 21:23, Lee Harr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> How about:
> > >> chflags sunlnk /
> > >> ?
> > >
> > >Set
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-22 08:02:04 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser writes:
> > > Did you type the exact THREE commands as shown above?
> >
> > Of course, it's been three weeks since I had that problem so I
> > would be insane to claim I have exact reco
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-21 23:54:43 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser writes:
> > > unload
> > > load /boot/kernel/kernel
> > > boot
> > >
> > > does it for me.
> >
> > Of course I run unload as the first step. It wrote it unloaded the
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-21 12:03:36 +0100:
> Kris Kennaway writes:
> > > loader to ignore loader.con) was that "unload" didn't help, it
> > > showed the kernel and modules were unloaded, but subsequent
> > >
> > > load
> > > boot
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > boot
>
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-04 19:02:07 -0700:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:35:53AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Booting a kernel with random compiled in, and load_random=YES in
> > loader.conf causes a panic very similar to the one described here:
> > http://lists.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-10 01:01:26 -0400:
> At 10:50 PM +0200 4/9/04, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >This is an extended version of my previous email to hackers@
> >which hasn't attracted any attention. This time I'm mailing
> >the authors too.
>
> I
Why does /bin/sh insert 0x81, or 129, or SYNBASE, before every non-word
character in here-doc delimiters? It grows
'END-of-vietnamese/x-unikey/files/patch-src::unikey-gtk::Makefile.am'
which is 69 characters, well below EOFMARKLEN (79) to 80 characters.
Should I file a PR?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tm
This is an extended version of my previous email to hackers@ which
hasn't attracted any attention. This time I'm mailing the authors too.
Two revisions need MFC in src/sys/sys/cdefs.h:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/cdefs.h.diff?r1=1.78&r2=1.79
Silences gobs of warnings in jus
Booting a kernel with random compiled in, and load_random=YES in
loader.conf causes a panic very similar to the one described here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-alpha/2003-August/000656.html
"Hi Mark, please fix random.ko" :-)
If a backtrace would be useful, I can retype it in an em
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-01 16:53:19 -0500:
> I have a program that I have the is supposed to run forever. I log any
> output to a log file. It is run in a startup script like thie:
>
> program_name >> $err_log 2>&1
>
> The problem is that after newsyslog rotates the $err_log file, no mor
Would some kind soul please MFC this?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/cdefs.h.diff?r1=1.78&r2=1.79
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-03-10 08:35:17 -0600:
> Unless somebody chimes in and just really wants me to stick this out to the
> bitter end, I'm about to kill my attempted import of the FreeBSD src/
> repository into a test Subversion instance.
>
> The process has just passed the 1 month mark:
>
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-02-12 16:48:25 -0400:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good
> > starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS.
>
> I missed the original thread here, so this point may have alre
I'd like to thank everyone who's replied to my questions regarding
the beastie menu and 4th. my mail has attracted far more attention
than I expected.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
___
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:35 -0700:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
> >the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
> >the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable
I have two related questions, one being more appropriate for current@,
the other for hackers@, but they're quite the same thing, so sorry for
the cross-post, I hope it's tolerable (I bet this won't solicit many
replies :).
I dislike the boot menu in CURRENT, and would prefer something that
* does
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-09 15:32:53 +0300:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:29:34 +
> Doug Rabson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The three main showstoppers for moving FreeBSD to subversion would be:
> [...]
>
> > 2. Support for $FreeBSD$ - user-specified keywords are not supported
> >and wo
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-08 16:36:30 -0800:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > That might be technically true, but the precise semantics of
> > "(semi-)freeze" aren't as widely known as you seem to think.
> >
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-07 23:17:31 -0800:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:08:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> > The ports freeze seems to last too long with recent releses. Or
> > maybe it's just I've gotten more involved, but out of the last fou
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-08 18:33:40 +1100:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:08:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >Limitations of CVS don't exactly help either. The fact that you need
> >direct access to the repository to be able to copy a tree with
> >his
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-07 14:29:35 +:
> Paul Robinson writes:
> > And for those of you who normally shout "Submit a patch" - well, I'm
> > thinking about it. :-)
>
> I've been thinking of your objection to the "submit a patch" reply,
> and I offer this as a proto-thought on how it can
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-10-08 09:49:21 +0100:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:25:25AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > According to http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers,
> > tcp/udp port 1000 is for "cadlock2". Our /etc/services claims
> > 1000/tcp
According to http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers,
tcp/udp port 1000 is for "cadlock2". Our /etc/services claims
1000/tcp is "cadlock", and 1000/ucp "ock".
Also: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/54371
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-09-16 16:58:06 -0400:
> At 10:23 AM -1000 9/16/03, Clifton Royston wrote:
> > In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some
> >simple hack to disregard these wildcard A records, short of
> >requesting zone transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via
> >peering
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-30 15:57:51 +0400:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, 19:29-0400, Zak Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2003-06-28 20:27+0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > > for instance?
> >
> > misc/25851
>
> I am not familiar with sysinstall code, sorry.
>
> > bin/32433
>
> Fixed in -current.
I s
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-18 11:01:25 +0100:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:18:52PM -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > Some of this could be done in the current installer, if there wasn't
> > an effort to make it still fit on a floppy. Mind you, I'd like to see
> > the floppy based install stick aro
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-06-23 11:45:37 -0400:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Socketd wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have this configuration and not having the
> > system fail (because of lacking rights or something):
> > /var/mail noexec
>
> nosuid would be fine here also.
# [EMAIL P
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-05-16 15:30:01 +0300:
> > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 02:48:12PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-04-26 14:53:36 +0300:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:44:00PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> &
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-11 14:25:35 -0800:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Thanks guys. Is there a clean way to make sure that the description
> > will always begin on the line below the tag line? IOW, with
> > .Bl -tag, if the actual tag width is less
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-10 14:40:41 -0800:
> In the meantime, is there an easy way to switch over my existing CVS
> tree to a mirror? (And is there a mirror?)
If you're talking about a working copy, then it's really easy:
find $wcdir -type d -name CVS | while read d; do
sed
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-11 08:29:54 -0600:
> In the last episode (Feb 11), Roman Neuhauser said:
> > Thanks guys. Is there a clean way to make sure that the
> > description will always begin on the line below the tag line?
> > IOW, with .Bl -tag, if the act
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-10 12:17:44 -0600:
> In the last episode (Feb 10), Roman Neuhauser said:
> > I'm writing a man page for a utility I'm writing, and I want the option
> > listing look like this:
> >
> > OPTIONS
> > -h, --h
Hi there,
two quick mdoc(7) questions:
I'm writing a man page for a utility I'm writing, and I want the option
listing look like this:
OPTIONS
-h, --help
Print a brief help message.
-n, --dry-run
Don't actually connect to the server. DDL generated by mktable.php
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-09 17:29:57 -0500:
> On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
> >>Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>Also the GNU grep has a lot more opt
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-03 13:20:04 +0100:
> Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
> > of them being -r.
>
> Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does not handle
> symnlinks correctly). Try textproc/freegrep
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-13 11:49:15 -0600:
> In the last episode (Jan 13), Roman Neuhauser said:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-1
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:57:25 -0800:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> > > > To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> > > To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
thanks for not cc'ing me.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 15:18:43 -0800:
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > So, do you manually put "yahoo.com" SOA records in your DNS?
> >
> > no.
> >
> > > How do you answer requests for "yah
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you sent me a copy again, please, don't do it.
1. I don't want one, I'll read your message on the list.
2. it's futile: your provider&#
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-09 12:48:03 -0800:
> To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
please don't cc me.
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > ! This is called a "split horizon DNS", and you need to run two
> > > ! DNS servers, one interior, and
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-06 17:36:52 +0100:
> ! > Background: This environment should be configured to use
> ! > an internet connection for internet-relevant things, but to
> ! > work flawlessly without such a connection as long as matters
> ! > do concern only systems within the LAN.
> !
> !
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 16:09:47 +0300:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > > In any event, cou
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-14 14:36:22 +0300:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
> > where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in
> >
Hi there,
continuing my make adventure, I've stumbled across the following
inconsistency. I would even call it a bug.
In any event, could someone point me to a place in the make(1) man page
where it says that the S and C modifiers dereference variables given in
both the pattern and replacement,
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-01 09:22:50 -0600:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:58:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >
> > I need to run my newly created Makefiles on one sorry RedHat box, and
> > the pmake package just doesn't cut it. So, since I couldn't find
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-01 04:52:14 -0700:
> Thus spake Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have another p?make related question, though. I've searched the
> > archives, but cannot find an answer: what is the actual relation between
> > "our"
I would like to thank everybody who replied to my post, and especially
to Chad David and Chuck Robey. Thanks to your help I have now the system
working as I need (with the exception of speed, but that is another
issue :)
I have another p?make related question, though. I've searched the
archives,
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-28 17:20:56 -0400:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> > yup. or the fact that /usr/share/doc/psd/12.make/paper.ascii.gz
> > documents conditionals in the form #keyword instead of .keyword
> > (that might wo
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 13:08:04 -0400:
> The odd behavior of variables is only one item from a whole list of them.
> Go take a look at what use: means, if you want a headache.
you mean .USE? looks quite powerful... a can of worms if misused. :)
> Or, how about the behavior of "incl
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 16:10:59 +0100:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:05:36PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> [... re periodic diffs]
> > And, what would the preferred interface be? Most of periodic.conf
> > knobs are bools, but I'm not sure
> > diff_{contex
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 13:08:04 -0400:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Now, saying "don't do it" is nice, but I'd like to know why.
> > Why doesn't this work? Also, what documentation (besides the
> > source)
[sent only to Chad by mistake]
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:35:54 -0600:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:35:16PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > unless you explicitly export things as environment variables,
> > > or set them on a command line when re-invoking Make.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 16:08:11 +0100:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > thanks a lot for your reply. You're right: I'm viewing Makefiles
> > as sequential programs, which obviously (even to me) is not quite
>
[repost from questions@; no replies received since 2002-09-17]
Hi there,
various /etc/periodic scripts mail root diffs of a few config files etc.
grep on my (quite fresh) STABLE box shows that except for
/etc/periodic/daily/210.backup-aliases, all the diff invocations use the
old format. I have
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:06:12 -0400:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
> > trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I've
> > stumbled across
Hi,
I've sent two messages about (p)make to questions@ but have not received
any replies, so I ask here.
I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I've
stumbled across a few variable related issues where t
Hi,
does this list require subscription to allow posts?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL
doesn't say so, but neither of my two attempts (before I subscribed) has
shown up in the archives.
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
1:55PM
60 matches
Mail list logo
