PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Could you provide the output from camcontrol identify for these
> disks I want to just double check the formatting before commiting as I
> don't have these disks here in labs.
>
>Regards
>Steve
>
> - Original Message ----- From: &
trolls,
uses the Intel X25-M in its benchmarks. Adding the quirk to 9.2 would
eliminate an unfair handicap on FreeBSD from their next set of benchmarks.
On 08/11/2013 09:48 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Thanks Richard I'll commit these when I get in the office next week.
>
>Rega
Signed-off-by: Richard Yao
---
sys/cam/ata/ata_da.c | 24
sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c | 24
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sys/cam/ata/ata_da.c b/sys/cam/ata/ata_da.c
index f201231..b7f293d 100644
--- a/sys/cam/ata/ata_da.c
+++ b
All,
We seem to have discovered a problem that occurs when adding an address (or
alias) to a DOWNed lagg interface. After adding an address, when you try to
bring the interface UP it can't reach the desired networks.
Turns out that the problem occurs because the lagg driver silently passes the
On 04/01/2013 12:48 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing this email to discuss the i386 architecture in FreeBSD.
>
> Computers are getting faster, but also more memory intensive. I
> can not find a laptop with less than 4 or 8 GB of RAM. Modern
> browsers, such as Firefox, require a 64
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 10:06 +0800, David Xu wrote:
> [...]
> >>> This code won't work, as I said, after the signal handler returned,
> >>> kernel will copy the signal mask contained in ucontext into kernel
> >>> space, and use it in feature signal delivering.
> >>>
> >>> The code should be modified
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:20 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 8 January 2013 08:15, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 07:36 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> .. or you could abstract it out a bit and use freebsd's
> >> aio_waitcomplete() or kqueue aio no
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> >
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >> Well, it turns out that your suggestion was correct.
> >>
&g
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 08:14 -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 15:02 +0800, David Xu wrote:
> > On 2013/01/08 14:33, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:46 +0800, David Xu wrote:
> > >> On 2013/01/08 09:27, Richard
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 07:36 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. or you could abstract it out a bit and use freebsd's
> aio_waitcomplete() or kqueue aio notification.
>
> It'll then behave much saner.
Yes, going forward that is what I want to do ... this would work nicely
with a kqueue back-end for Sa
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 15:02 +0800, David Xu wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 14:33, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:46 +0800, David Xu wrote:
> >> On 2013/01/08 09:27, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I am running in
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:46 +0800, David Xu wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 09:27, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I am running into a problem with AIO in Samba 3.6.x under FreeBSD 8.0
> > and I want to check if the assumptions made by the original coder are
>
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 22:24 -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I am running into a problem with AIO in Samba 3.6.x under FreeBSD 8.0
> > and I want to check if the assumptions made by the
Hi folks,
I am running into a problem with AIO in Samba 3.6.x under FreeBSD 8.0
and I want to check if the assumptions made by the original coder are
correct.
Essentially, the code queues a number of AIO requests (up to 100) and
specifies an RT signal to be sent upon completion with siginfo_t.
T
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 00:10 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 12/8/12 5:05 PM, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 00:50 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> Our QA group (at xxx) using Samba and smbtorture has
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 00:50 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Our QA group (at xxx) using Samba and smbtorture has been seeing a
> > lot of cases where accept returns ECONNABORTED because the system load
> > is high and Samba has a large listen backlog.
> >
> > Every now and then
Hi folks,
Our QA group (at xxx) using Samba and smbtorture has been seeing a
lot of cases where accept returns ECONNABORTED because the system load
is high and Samba has a large listen backlog.
Every now and then we get a crash in smbd or in winbindd and winbindd
complains of too many open files
Dear Everyone,
I know that the kernel is a BTX client, but I do not understand the
protocol used by loader to pass sysctl settings and loadable modules to
the kernel. Is there documentation on this?
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/02/2012 03:06 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. please keep in mind that embedded platforms (a) don't necessarily
> benefit from it, and (b) have a very small footprint. Bloating out the
> compression/archival tools for the sake of possible SMP support will
> make me very, very sad.
>
>
>
> Adr
I am working on a port of a Linux kernel module to FreeBSD. I decided to
rebase on FreeBSD 9.1-BETA1. I installed Gentoo Prefix so that I would
be able to work on this port in a more familiar development environment.
Unfortunately, there is an issue where /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod.mk invokes
xargs wi
On 07/22/2012 03:19 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> You are right. It is not capped at that speed:
>>
>> root@freebsd:/root # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=16384 count=262144
>>
>>
>>
>> 262144+0 records in
>> 262144+0 records out
>> 4294967296 bytes transferred in 615.840721 secs (6974153 bytes/sec
What is the default kernel thread stack size on FreeBSD? I am
particularly interested in knowing about i386 and amd64, but knowing
this for other architectures (such as MIPS) would also be useful.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/21/2012 04:15 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device
>> da0: 3.300MB/s transfers
>> da0: Command Queueing enabled
>> da0: 409600MB (838860800 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 52216C)
>>
>> It does not explain why virtio is slow though, although I still need to
>> te
On 07/20/2012 06:26 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 03:44 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 19 July 2012 11:27, Richard Yao wrote:
>>> Dear Everyone,
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 9 has awful block IO performance in KVM. I have experienced it
>>> and others
On 07/20/2012 03:44 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 19 July 2012 11:27, Richard Yao wrote:
>> Dear Everyone,
>>
>> FreeBSD 9 has awful block IO performance in KVM. I have experienced it
>> and others have experienced it. Someone posted slides to slideshare with
&
openers. Does anyone know what is wrong?
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/05/2012 12:18 PM, Sean wrote:
>
> On 06/07/2012, at 1:21 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
>
>> On 07/05/2012 10:58 AM, Sean wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012, at 10:02 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The second is the e-file command, which w
On 07/05/2012 02:10 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2012 15:01, Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:19:38 -0700
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/04/2012 11:51, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> What would be really nice here is a comm
/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c uses read_eflags() and
write_eflags(), which live as inline functions in
/usr/src/sys/i386/include/cpufunc.h.
/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/bootinfo64.c also includes
/usr/include/machine/cpufunc.h, but that is
/usr/src/sys/amd64/include/cpufunc.h on amd
On 06/21/2012 06:49 PM, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:42:49PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> There's no need to do a wholesale replacement of the RC system in
>> FreeBSD to support this concept. What you are describing are "service
>> profiles". And we already have a single fi
On 06/20/2012 11:28 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> Hi all, I wanted to jump in here. My name is Daniel Robbins and I'm
>> the creator of Gentoo Linux and the original designer of the Gentoo
>> initscripts, which now exist in rewritten form as OpenRC. FreeBSD
>> inspired many of the concepts in Gento
On 06/20/2012 03:39 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> fwiw, from previous discussions on FreeBSD boot time, ISTR that there
> are other places where more time is spent. Some analysis to prove that
> indeed the rc subsystem is the dominant term would be a good starting
> place.
I neither claimed that it w
On 06/19/2012 06:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>> On 06/19/2012 04:12 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
>>>> On 06/19/2012 12:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>&
On 06/19/2012 04:12 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
>> On 06/19/2012 12:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 6/18/2012 4:05 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>>>> Doug, we already have OpenRC implemented. You can install Gentoo F
On 06/19/2012 12:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 6/18/2012 4:05 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>> Doug, we already have OpenRC implemented. You can install Gentoo FreeBSD
>> in a jail, install regular FreeBSD in another jail and do your own
>> performance comparisons.
>
> Bzz
On 06/19/2012 07:20 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>> On 06/19/2012 12:39 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> - delay at rc.d scripts - there are some delays inserted.
>>>
>>>> The latter item is the only plac
On 06/19/2012 12:39 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> - delay at rc.d scripts - there are some delays inserted.
>
>> The latter item is the only place where making changes to rc.d is going
>> to help, and only then by parellelizing, and even then you are not
>> really going to gain much since most thin
On 06/18/2012 06:53 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> It's unfortunate that this thread evolved into a discussion about
> replacing rc.d, since that's almost certainly not relevant to the
> original topic of improving the overall boot time.
>
> If you analyze the boot process thoroughly you should see that
On 06/18/2012 01:12 PM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 18/06/2012 09:11, Atte Peltomäki wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:43:37PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Atte Peltomäki
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/12 22:24, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:00:18 -0400 Richard Yao
> wrote:
>
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
>> On 06/14/12 20:51, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/12 20:51, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:54:28 -0400
> Richard Yao wrote:
>
>> NetBSD has replacements for GCC's crt{begin,end}.S:
>>
>> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/lib/csu/arc
NetBSD has replacements for GCC's crt{begin,end}.S:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/lib/csu/arch/?only_with_tag=MAIN
This would complement compiler-rt and libstdc++. We intend to import it
in downstream Gentoo FreeBSD.
Could this be imported into FreeBSD-CURRENT?
Gentoo FreeBSD developers. We
would all love to see OpenRC in upstream FreeBSD.
On 06/14/12 10:34, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Thanks for the information -- I got scared by "SysV init". This actually
> does look very nice.
> -Nathan
>
> On 06/13/12 13:35, Richard Yao wrote:
On 06/12/12 18:00, Richard Yao wrote:
>> On 06/11/12 18:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Brandon Falk
>>> wrote:
>>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> I was just wondering what it is that FreeBSD does that makes it ta
On 06/11/12 18:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I was just wondering what it is that FreeBSD does that makes it take so long
>> to boot. Booting into Ubuntu minimal or my own custom Linux distro,
>> literally takes 0.5-2 seconds t
On 05/04/12 15:11, Dieter BSD wrote:
> *WHY* is Linux so much more popular than the BSDs?
Linux is popular because of RedHat. Corporate executives like to pay for
software because it shifts responsibility away from them in the event
that something goes wrong. If something goes wrong with RHEL, the
On 05/02/12 04:55, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> wrote:
>> Another point is that server installers are highly educated with respect to
>> desktop installers and their numbers are small with respect to desktop
>> users .
>>
>> For them , it is
s
implementing those symbols are declared. Does anyone know where I can
find them?
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
kqueue enable me to specify which
threads handle events on specific file descriptors?
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:32:08AM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
>> I wrote a program for Linux that uses Asynchronous Ne
also works with FreeBSD. Is that possible?
I am not on the mailing list. Please CC me any responses.
Yours truly,
Richard Yao
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:26:18AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Hi,
> FreeBSD has support for webcams? News to me.
Luigi Rizzo was (is?) working on webcam support:
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/FreeBSD/usb-cameras.html
--
Regards,
Richard.
/* Homo Sapiens non urinat in ven
-a
FreeBSD Soekris 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sat May 17 10:53:38 UTC
2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/C5 i386
Any help would be appreciated
Richard
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
OS since 8-).
According to the archives, Alex Lukin has been working on porting one
and I'd love to get hold of the latest version and help out with
development.
So if Alex is around could you contact me and let me have the patch(es)?
Thanks very much.
C
motherboard doesn't have any option to
disable pci-burst. This gives intermittent errors.
sos@ comments on SII chipsets isn't encourageing either.
/P
3ware 7000 or 9000 series are working fine in my 5.4 box
Cheers
Richard
___
freebsd-hackers@f
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 12:26 pm, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:06:35PM -0600, Richard Hodges wrote:
> > > ./aes_test
> >
> > Using key: 2b 7e 15 16 28 ae d2 a6 ab f7 15 88 09 cf 4f 3c
> >
> > 920F0CE0A9A96BB9D8416962BDBBAA7C
> >
9 3d 42 18 70 34 ce a8 67 1b 88 43 10 a2 d1 8c
So I am asking if anyone can point out if I made an "obvious mistake",
duplicate my results on your own system, or provide some other useful
information on this.
Many thanks!
-Richard
pgpQCiBkQtTtQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
depth 3 -name work -print -delete -prune
I would be surprised if the globbing in most shells was more efficient than find. Although as
mentioned before, nothing beats putting all the work directories in a single location, and using a
single rm command.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROT
looked at the journaling layer that Matt has been adding to
DragonflyBSD? What you are talking about appears very similar. Or am I
misunderstanding something?
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, David Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having some problems with the tdb package on FreeBSD 4.6.2 and 4.10.
> >
> > One of the things the above package does is:
> >
> >mmap th
nmap does not suggest
that I am doing anything wrong.
Is it possible that FreeBSD is deferring flushing the dirty data, and then
forgets to do it when the same starting address is used etc?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]richardsharpe.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.
al you can encrypt with
a single key.
Just throwing out a data point.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
have enough of her code. I tried this:
>
> #include
> unsigned char Receiver = 0;
>
> int main(void)
> {
> Receiver = 0x00;
> printf( "Receiver -=>%c\n", Receiver );
> return(0);
> }
>
> compiled it with:
>
> gcc
gt; > > unsigned char Receiver = 0;
> > > etc.
> >
> > Done that to no avail :(
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kat.
>
> I wonder if Receiver is defined in a include file elsewhere? I checked
> all the header files on my system and
he line numbers in Wtrend_Drivers.c
>
> These are some of the errors I get in pairs for each of the above variables:
>
> Wtrend_Drivers.c:15: conflicting types for `Receiver'
> Wtrend_Drivers.h:9: previous declaration of `Receiver'
Ummm, move the definition of all those vari
technical support. I've also sent in an e-mail to the people who wrote
the Linux driver.
It would be really nice to see, for each version of the card, what the
chipset is...
Richard Schilling
Ketrien I. Saihr-Kenchedra wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
I still get wa
This is from the writers of the Linux driver for the PCM200. I wonder
if there's a good technical manual or guide on writing drivers for that
chipset.
Richard
Original Message
Subject: Re: Linksys PCM200 chipset
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:05:10 +0800
From: Allen(éåå)ND
technical support. I've also sent in an e-mail to the people who wrote
the Linux driver.
It would be really nice to see, for each version of the card, what the
chipset is...
Richard Schilling
Ketrien I. Saihr-Kenchedra wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:
I still get watchdo
additional patch to the 5.2 code that I can
apply to take care of the watchdog timeout?
Thanks.
Richard Schilling
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
me soon. And since there are
more important things to worry about, the current setup is just fine
with me.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
years ago). Since there are plenty of good third party shells, there
are many other tasks for which FreeBSD developers can better spend their
time.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
you tried to run (g)vinum on top of AOE drives?
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Ing.Richard Andrysek wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I've read your question about SPDIF capture device on freebsd. I am
> currently looking for similar device.Have you found such one? Can you
> access subcode etc.?
Sorry, I never did find anything immediat
Hi,
I am trying to compile a program that uses "initstate_r" from random(3) in
libc.
However this function only seems to exist in the linux version of libc.
Compare `man 3 random` on a linux box [1] which has "initstate_r" and
"initstate", whereas `man 3 random` on a FreeBSD box [2] has only
etter serves the goal of libarchive being embedded in everything
(tar, pax, cpio, pkg_*, etc).
Tim has done a great job with this so far.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Hi all,
I can't get ld to recognise some "so" libraries without using the -L option:
%cat test.c
int main () {}
%ls /usr/local/lib/libsqlite*
/usr/local/lib/libsqlite.a /usr/local/lib/libsqlite.so.2
/usr/local/lib/libsqlite.so
%gcc test.c -lsqlite
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsqlite
%gcc test.c -
hen looking for something else.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ess there is evidence of more recent gcc bugs, that part of the
handbook should really be removed.
I can easily imagine the reaction on this list if the reverse were true,
and the gcc handbook was knocking FreeBSD for a bug in release 3.0 (or
what
Richard Coleman wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
All,
Every FreeBSD release cycle in the past year has hit bumps due to install
floppy problems. This is becoming more and more of a burden on the
Release Engineering Team, as we simply do not have the resources to
constantly battle the floppies.
FreeBSD
is committed to maintaining the floppies as they are today.
Otherwise, we need to seriously consider the alternative.
Thanks,
Scott
I apologize if this is a dumb question. But rather than using two
floppies during the install process, why not three or four?
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I think the "FreeBSD is dying" crowd from slashdot have found the
FreeBSD mailing lists. They must be mad because they got a lump of coal
in their Christmas stocking.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pull-Henning Kunt wrote:
Back in the day, around FreeBSD 2.2.8, it was a very nice
ed correctly. There is a
port for pf in the ports tree. But I haven't tried it, since ipf is
working fine for me.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
4 bit machines?). I doubt the
GCC docs talk about this. You might check Richard Steven's book on
"Advanced Unix Programming". It covers lots of information about
standard machine limits and how to discover them.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
machines, but nothing
stopped you doing it.
-- Richard
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Ok, GEOM Gate is ready for testing.
> For those who don't know what it is, they can read README:
Aaargh! It's the return of nd(4) from SunOS.
(Sorry about that.)
-- Richard
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.fre
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1 on P4 3GHz with hyperthreading and I see
drastic slowdown when kernel with hyperthreading is
ng as compared to
the difference between -j1 and -j2 for a single threaded kernel. It's
over a 50% slowdown.
Richard Coleman
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
In several recent articles, I've read that with the new Intel BTX
motherboards, they are going to drop many of the legacy ports (like PS/2
mouse and keyboard). So, this may soon become a more common situation.
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, David Gilbert wrote:
DG> I acquired m
on data acquisition? If I'm not terribly mistaken, the
encoding is about 3mb/s, with each bit having one or two transitions.)
Thanks!
-Richard
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsu
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Richard Sharpe wrote this message on Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:38 -0700:
> > We recently encountered a problem with NFS throughput between a FreeBSD
> > server (we are using 4.6.2, but the same code seems to be in 5.1 as well).
>
hen lots of data is in
the cache.
This was found by Chandu Gadhiraju with help from others.
Regards
-----
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l
ce the
current sort with the BSD licensed version, and move the current one to
a port "gnu-sort", or whatever.
I suddenly feel the need to go build a bikeshed.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://
so. It certainly has the 7501
chipset in it and 2x1.8GHz Xeons.
> An other question about this box is the two on-board Gigabit Network
> Controller. Do they work fine on FreeBSD? May I use fiber Giganet NCI like
> Netgear GA621 on it?
They worked for me. I dunno about the fibre stu
names and aliases.
I figured that nsswitch.conf would deprecate host.conf. Is this not true?
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
OpenLDAP would also be interesting.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Long wrote:
All,
This is kind of an unconventional call for help. As we approach the
release of 5.2, we'd really like to show off the performance and
stability of our new threading packages. So, I'm looking
ith a little bit of modification, these extension
> > can be applied to other BSD variants.
>
> It hasn't been updated in a while, but it's definitely a start. It works
> pretty well for 4.3, and I know it's been updated to work with 4.6
> (though possibly not in the
Hi,
My name is Richard. I saw your interest in Section 508 and
Accessiblity and I just wanted to let you know that there
is a new product for webmasters that uses speech recognition
to make the Web sites more accessible. The Voice Web Studio
software enables you to add speech as another mode
v/joy1 to both exist, attached to the
same I/O port (0x201).
if you look at the patch you'll see there are only minor changes required to
achieve this.. its quite straightforward.
hope this is some use to you -
regards,
richard.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
gards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
h "vipw",
> but you don't complain about the difficulty *still* involved
> in adding them, if the "vipw" step is removed. Better to
> eliminate the need to create the accounts at all.
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[a
os ? ":!@" : ",\t:+&#%^()!@~*?<>=|\\/\"";
>
> while (name[l]) {
> if (strchr(notch, name[l]) != NULL || name[l] < ' ' || name[l] ==
>127 ||
>
> - Ryan
>
>
--
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
