BPF - Problem with ioctl calls of BPF

2002-03-11 Thread Rajesh P Jain
ate 2 interfaces to separate BPF's. With Regards Rajesh P Jain Join 18 million Eudora users by signing up for a free Eudora Web-Mail account at http://www.eudoramail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: BPF - Locally Generated Packet Reception

2002-03-08 Thread Rajesh P Jain
n a variety of ethernet devices -- >which interface type are you using? > >Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project >[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services > >On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Rajesh P Jain wrote: > >> Hi, >> In the B

(No Subject)

2002-03-06 Thread Rajesh P Jain
Hi, In the BPF - Berkeley Packet Filter, when a file descriptor is associated to an interface to send and receive packets, there is an ioctl parameter "BIOCSSEESENT", which is by default set to 1. Hence the packets both from "remote systems" and "locally generated" are received. If "

BPF - Locally Generated Packet Reception

2002-03-06 Thread Rajesh P Jain
Hi, In the BPF - Berkeley Packet Filter, when a file descriptor is associated to an interface to send and receive packets, there is an ioctl parameter "BIOCSSEESENT", which is by default set to 1. Hence the packets both from "remote systems" and "locally generated" are received. If "

Re: BPF - Packet Reception

2001-11-27 Thread Rajesh P Jain
way in FreeBSD (other than modifying the driver code), so that high packet-rate reception can be done by without dropping any of the packets ? Thanks in advance Raj -- On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:05:33 Robert Watson wrote: > >On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Rajesh P Jain wrote: > >>

BPF - Packet Reception

2001-11-26 Thread Rajesh P Jain
Hello, We are trying to use BPF (Packet Filter) pseduo device to send and receive the packets. Even if there is a slight delay (Some processing has to be done on the read packet) between the issuing of 'read' call, so many packets are getting dropped. Is there a way to attach