Re: any status of that project?

2012-08-16 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2012-08-16, at 14:03, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > http://freebsdfoundation.blogspot.com/2012/03/new-project-nand-flash-support.html > > this would be great thing to have it working properly. any progress info? FYI: the code was merged w/ HEAD some time ago. See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?v

Re: How does loader(8) decide where to load the kernel?

2012-05-15 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2012-05-13, at 09:17, Tim Kientzle wrote: > On May 12, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: >> >> On May 10, 2012, at 5:32 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> >>> On May 8, 2012, at 1:32 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: On the AM3358, the DRAM starts at 0x8000 on boot, so I'm trying

Re: gcc 4.2 miscompilation with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer on amd64

2011-12-09 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2011-12-08, at 17:53, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote: >> We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1 >> and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar >> problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately >> optimize code with -fno-omit-frame-pointer. >>

Re: gcc 4.2 miscompilation with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer on amd64

2011-12-08 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2011-12-07, at 21:28, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was lucky to write a bit of code which gcc 4.2 fails to compile >> correctly with -O2. Too keep long story short the code fails for gcc >> from base system and last gcc

Re: Embedded switch instead of stadard PHY

2011-05-11 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2011-05-08, at 11:36, Damjan Marion wrote: > > On May 8, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 8 May 2011 01:22, Damjan Marion wrote: >> >>> I would like to implement support for embedded switch on WRT350Nv2 router >>> which is based on 88F5181L SoC (ARM). FreeBSD already have sup

Re: PowerPC e500v2 and IEEE 754

2011-03-22 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2011-03-22, at 17:12, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello > > does anyone know if FreeBSD provides the software support for full IEEE 754 > conformance on a PowerPC e500v2 core (for example QorIQ series from > Freescale)? Do you mean using the floating point APU in E500? We basically run with s

Re: GSoC: Generic DMA engine framework

2010-05-03 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2010-05-03, at 22:22, Kristof Provost wrote: > On 2010-05-03 22:12:28 (+0200), Rafal Jaworowski wrote: >> >> Not sure how far you went with the crypto engine work, but be advised we >> already have completed the CESA driver, only I haven't managed to commit the

Re: GSoC: Generic DMA engine framework

2010-05-03 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
On 2010-05-03, at 21:51, Kristof Provost wrote: > Hi, > > On 2010-04-30 19:44:45 (+0200), Jakub Klama wrote: >> This summer I'll add generic mechanism for using general purpose >> DMA engines found in embedded system-on-chip devices. This will make >> possible to schedule transfers from kern

FreeBSD and U-Boot -- was: Ramdisk support

2006-11-16 Thread Rafal Jaworowski
Gary Jennejohn wrote: u-boot is unfortuately extremely Linux-centric. I work closely with the person who "invented" u-boot, Wolfgang Denk, and know that he'd just love to see the *BSD support improved. Unfortunately, u-boot makes heavy use of Linux' support for rootdev, etc., which AFAIK is mis