Re: crashdump "watchdog timeout" - Howto get useful information?

2009-09-02 Thread Peter Much
In article <200909020835.47358@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin wrote: |You can use the gdb scripts at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/gdb/ in kgdb to |figure some of that stuff out (source gdb6 from within gdb. I usually start |with 'ps'). WHOOAAAH, THAT ROCKS Thats a lot more than I had hop

crashdump "watchdog timeout" - Howto get useful information?

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Much
Dear all, could anybody share some insight (or pointers to docs) on how to approach an analysis of a "watchdog timeout" crashdump? I hopefully have the necessities in place (that is, I can load the dump into ddd and actually see things). But I have no real idea about where to start looking fo

Re: FreeBSD 5.3: Sharedlibs using sharedlibs (and Tcl)

2005-03-17 Thread Peter Much
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:35:16PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: ! ! --On onsdag, mars 16, 2005 11.43.31 +0100 Peter Much ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ! ! >! So, you're saying that pctclsh *can* access, but pgaccess *cannot*? ! >Odd... ! I would expect they'd both use t

Re: sendmail: how to get the named of FreeBSD4.7 standards compliant?

2003-01-09 Thread Peter Much
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 12:07:19PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: ! What are the precise contents of your /etc/resolv.conf? search oper.dinoex.org nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 192.168.98.2 rgds, PMc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in

Re: sendmail: how to get the named of FreeBSD4.7 standards compliant?

2003-01-09 Thread Peter Much
! > Exactly. And when this is not found, then the resolver will ! > inplicitly issue another query for the unqualified name. ! > ! > And it is even worse with sendmail, because sendmail does quite ! > interesting things there - like switching off RES_DEFNAMES - ! > so this one will definitely not

Re: sendmail: how to get the named of FreeBSD4.7 standards compliant?

2003-01-07 Thread Peter Much
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:37:26PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: ! > And now I do not think that a "split horizon" configuration could ! > solve my problem at all. Because if it could tell me that my ! > unqualified hostname does not exist (without querying the outside), ! > then it would also tell

Re: sendmail: how to get the named of FreeBSD4.7 standards compliant?

2003-01-06 Thread Peter Much
! > Background: This environment should be configured to use ! > an internet connection for internet-relevant things, but to ! > work flawlessly without such a connection as long as matters ! > do concern only systems within the LAN. ! ! This is called a "split horizon DNS", and you need to run tw

Re: sendmail: how to get the named of FreeBSD4.7 standards compliant?

2003-01-01 Thread Peter Much
! ! Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: ! > pmc> While it is true that the said sendmail-option solves the problem ! > pmc> (if sendmail is new enough to understand it), I could nowhere find ! > pmc> information on how to fix the bug in the nameserver - that is, ! > pmc> in the nameserver that is packaged

sendmail: how to get the named of FreeBSD4.7 standards compliant?

2002-12-31 Thread Peter Much
Under certain circumstances, when sending mail, the mail will appear in the local spool directory as Deferred: Operation timed out with otherhost.domain while observably there has no timeout happened: the sendmail has returned just immediately from the failing delivery action. It is s