On 06/04/12 03:12, Chris wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 20:50:59 -0300
Mario Lobo wrote:
On Sunday 27 May 2012 14:05:16 Yuri wrote:
On 05/27/2012 10:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
So, at least in my case, I respectfully disagree with the
assessment in the Subject.
i386 is one difference (I use amd6
On Sunday 04 March 2012 02:29:08 Brandon Falk wrote:
> > If you define WITHOUT_GCC, a cc isn't created in
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin but if you go into the directory and do a
> > symbolic link from clang, and restart make with -DNO_CLEAN it'll work
> > and complete. One of the programs hardc
> > > Idea 1: Fix 'n' PRs, get a tee-shirt, fridge magnet, plush daemon, ...
> > >
> > > Idea 2: Give it status. Set up a web page with PR fixing stats
> > >
> > > name/handle..total PRs fixed...fixed in last 12 months...average
> > > fixed/year Sheldon..150...90.
On Wednesday 05 October 2011 10:46:47 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 04.10.2011 22:47, Sean M. Collins пишет:
> > I've never heard of the utility until you mentioned it.
> >
> > I'd nuke it, since really there are more popular alternatives like Redis
> > and Memcached in the ports tree that most people
On Sunday 25 April 2010 11:17:40 Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +0000, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > It may already be implemented, but it would be nice if there was
> > something defined while the kernel and/or world is being built to that a
> > n
Hello Hackers & Current,
I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
set
of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
independently of a ports build?
Right now, I use the base GCC to compile the world and kernel, and
GCC44
for
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> > after the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
> if the ne
On Sunday 13 September 2009 18:58:02 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > With the recent changes to /etc/rc.d for network start-up. I was
> > wondering what is now correct. The previously working ipv6 configuration
Hello Current and Hackers,
With the recent changes to /etc/rc.d for network start-up. I was
wondering
what is now correct. The previously working ipv6 configuration no longer
creates a static default route, and I have not been able to figure out why.
After boot, if I manually add the
Crud! Just shoot me! I'm very sorry about this.. Typing to fast and not
checking..
On Monday 27 July 2009 21:23:36 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> ACK! Sorry.. I messed up the revision number in the message body...
>
> On Monday 27 July 2009 21:18:22 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> >
ACK! Sorry.. I messed up the revision number in the message body...
On Monday 27 July 2009 21:18:22 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> I dont know if there is a current issue with other systems or if it is
> localized to me, but ever since > r195914 I am getting a fata
Hello Current,
I dont know if there is a current issue with other systems or if it is
localized to me, but ever since > r195914 I am getting a fatal trap on boot.
The process is always in the swapper and is always a 12.
System is AMD64 Core2-Quad, 4 Gigs, gptzfsboot from a mirr
Hi Hackers,
I was wondering if someone could give me some advice. I just updated one of
my servers from 7.2-pre to 7.2-stable (07/05/2009) and lost my IPv6
connectivity. The machine has been given a static IPv6 address and ND is not
used (I set the address in the rc.conf file). On reboot,
Hi Hajimu,
> ken> Any time I do a ping6 or traceroute6 I receive an error stating
> "Invalid ken> value for hints." However, I am able to do all other
> functions (telnet, ssh, ken> etc.)
>
> ken> feathers# ping6 ipv6.google.com
> ken> ping6: Invalid value for hints
>
> ken> feathers# traceroute
Hi Current and Hackers,
I have only seen this recently and was wondering if anyone else can
confirm
this as a bug or perhaps a setup problem on my end. I think it started to
appear with 8-Current from about the 25th of march.
Any time I do a ping6 or traceroute6 I receive an e
Hi Adrian,
I am not sure, but I didnt think ZFS 13 was ever going to be merged into
7-stable. I thought the kernel memory requirements were to great (just going
back in my memory on that one). Also, I think there are still a few bugs
left with the zil being enabled (and/or prefetch) causing
Hi Current & Hackers,
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing this problem: Any use of
bsdtar to
create a new archive causes the process to be unresponsive to all signals and
consumes 100% cpu time. The machine I am testing on is a Core 2 quad running
in AMD64 (8 gigs ram, zfs boot,
- Original Message -
From: "Andriy Gapon"
To: ;
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:11 PM
Subject: ich watchdog vs intel smm code
Some time earlier I reported that ichwd driver doesn't produce any
effect on my system with Intel DG33TL motherboard when watchdog timer is
allowed to ex
On Sunday 07 December 2008 09:22:16 Doug Rabson wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2008, at 03:19, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> >
> > Recently and friend and I have been trying to get the new
> > gptzfsboot working
> > on our machines and ran into a interesting
Hello Hackers,
Recently and friend and I have been trying to get the new gptzfsboot
working
on our machines and ran into a interesting problem.
Initially I was building the world without the environment variable
LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=YES in the /etc/make.conf and this, of course
Hello hackers,
I was wondering if there is a work around for this...
In 8.0-current I have installed the new version of ZFS and upgraded the
filing systems to 13. I had a thought that I would make a zfs for /tmp and set
the exec to no (thinking that nothing should ever be exec
On Friday 28 November 2008 17:14:33 Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I forward my orginal mail to freebsd-questions. I hope someone can
> shed some light here...
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:33 AM
>
Hello Hackers,
I was wondering if anyone knows a work around for this.
I have added a log device to one of my zfs pools (it is a unused ATA
drive
slice that has no activity on it after boot up as most other directories live
in there own zfs filing systems). I have added a SSD
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Rabson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Olivier SMEDTS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pegasus Mc Cleaft"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pascal Hofstee" <
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:42:08 you wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wro
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> >
>
> `who' works perfectly fine for me on CURRENT/AMD64 synced up 3 days
> ago, via an ssh terminal. Can you provide more
Hello Hackers,
I noticed something the other day that I thought was a bit weird. I had
a
high amount of HD activity, so I wanted to see who was on my machine. I tried
using the "who" command and received no information (not even for myself).
I have found that various methods
0 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
> >>
> >> "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >
Hi everyone,
I am having difficulties rebuilding the world after some patches were made
today. I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing the same troubles?
ld -static -N --gc-sections -nostdlib -m elf_i386_fbsd -Ttext 0x0 -o
gptzfsboot.out /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot/../
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 19:32:47 Srinivas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small doubt.
>
> Suppose I have a PCI card with a general purpose CPU on it. Could it be
> able to communicate with another PCI device or ISA device(lets say IDE hard
> disk)?
Hi Srinivas,
Others may have a differe
On Saturday 11 October 2008 21:53:35 Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > On 10/11/08, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> With regards to the traditional BSD partitioning scheme, having a
> >> separate /usr, /home, /tmp, etc... there's no reason to
Again I would like to extend my thanks to everyone who helped with this
problem, and a special thank you Jeremy and Bruce for trying to sus out where
the fault might be.
Your input and support is deeply appreciated.
Peg
> -Original Message-
> From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav [mailto:[EMAIL
On Monday 29 September 2008 05:07:13 Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Bruce Cran wrote:
> > I'm also seeing this problem on my amd64 7.1-PRERELEASE system:
> >> atacontrol list
> >
> > ATA channel 0:
> > Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 5
> > Slave: no device present
> > atacontrol: ioctl(I
On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:37:09 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Yea.. The machine is otherwise running fine, and also loaded the driver
> > for the ata raid controller (I made the machine boot off a raid-1 pack
> > and made slices on the pack for /, /usr, /var . The rest zfs for
> > /usr/home)
>
On Sunday 28 September 2008 21:42:41 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:43:58AM +, Pegasus McCleaft wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem. I have
> > recently reloaded my machine (due to a meltdown of my primary boot
> > drive) and noticed t
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:52:48 Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> If you have an Intel ICH chipset and the ichwd driver doesn't work for
> you, please test this patch :
Oliver,
Thanks for the patch, but sadly this didnt help the situation I have
with my
motherboard. It ident
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if anyone knows if there is planned an update to the
binutils
for the base system planned?
The reason why I'm asking is (occasionally) I use a later gcc then what
comes
with the system to take advantage of the newer opcodes in the Core 2.
Unf
On Thursday 07 August 2008 19:47:31 David Malone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > The problem is cvsupd - since it's written in Modula3 and doesn't
> > support IPv6 you have to use an inetd/netcat hack to accept IPv6
> > connections on the server. As mentione
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2008 13:28
> To: Pegasus Mc Cleaft
> Cc: 'Stefan Sperling'; 'Maxim Konovalov'; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org;
> 'Tim Clewlow'
> Subject: Re: IPv
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Sperling
> Sent: 05 August 2008 11:51
> To: Maxim Konovalov
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Pegasus Mc Cleaft; Tim Clewlow
> Subject: Re: IPv6 CVS
>
&
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there are any IPv6 CVS servers for FreeBSD? (As in
receiving the STABLE and ports branches) I currently use cvs.freebsd.org but
it dosent have an record.
Ta
Peg
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if you guys could comment or give guidance
to the following question: By watching the threads here and also in the CVS
commit group, I see there has been (or will be) a change to the way the
kernel addresses memory. Specifically in its ability to
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd;a=summary
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff
> Sent: 27 June 2008 14:59
> To: Sean Cavanaugh
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: 3D
On Sunday 22 June 2008 19:20:41 Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
> On FreeBSD 7, OpenSSL does not use the cryptodev engine by default. This
> is a known problem. See
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/hackers/2008-06/msg00076.ht
>ml
>
> openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -elapsed -engine crypt
On Saturday 21 June 2008 14:44:02 Anish Mistry wrote:
> On Friday 20 June 2008, joe mcguckin wrote:
> > I'm looking for a cheap and small embedded platform to use as a
> > portable vpn endpoint. It doesn't have to be fast, it just has to
> > run *BSD.
> >
> > Any suggestions??
>
> www.pcengines.ch
Hi all.. I found the same problem recently, but I also found someone's post on
the Internet that suggested a change to
the /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/eng_cryptodev.c file. I made the
change to the file and it definitely does force openssl to use the crypto
hardware. I am not sure if
46 matches
Mail list logo
