On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:19:37PM +0200, Uwe Doering wrote:
> There were changes in dummynet's configuration functions that, among
> other things, dealt with protecting certain code sequences with the
> proper SPL. They went into the CVS repository after 4.8. I can't tell
> whether these fix
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:29:24PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Very nice idea!! This greatly improves jail management on FreeBSD. There
> is a possibility for a minor drawback -- if one can change a system binary
> in the host system, them all jails are compromised -- but assuming one
> woul
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote:
> I've been playing with shared memory in jails, and very soon found
> out that one jail's segments are visible (didn't check the accesibility
> thoroughly) in another, which IMO is against the very idea of the jail.
kern/48471
--
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
Hello,
> as PF+ALTQ gateway in production environment. For ALTQ there is the problem
> of "will your driver be supported?".
Could You please explain a bit, why ALTQ model is placed so close
to network adapter driver (that they have to b
4 matches
Mail list logo
