Re: OpenBSD's strlcpy(3) and strlcat(3)

eplacement for strcpy/strcat than strncpy/strncat (which they certainly are). Sure, you could go around telling people "use snprintf instead" or "use asprintf instead", but is that the issue at hand? Paul Hart -- Paul Robert Hart><8> ><8> ><8&

Re: OpenBSD's strlcpy(3) and strlcat(3)

d Miller and Theo de Raadt. It was later mentioned that the paper and accompanying slides are available at: http://www.openbsd.org/papers/strlcpy-paper.ps http://www.openbsd.org/papers/strlcpy-slides.ps I think each function is well thought out and I think they'd be a great addition

Re: OpenBSD's strlcpy(3) and strlcat(3)

eplacement for strcpy/strcat than strncpy/strncat (which they certainly are). Sure, you could go around telling people "use snprintf instead" or "use asprintf instead", but is that the issue at hand? Paul Hart -- Paul Robert Hart><8> ><8> ><8&g

Re: OpenBSD's strlcpy(3) and strlcat(3)

by Todd Miller and Theo de Raadt. It was later mentioned that the paper and accompanying slides are available at: http://www.openbsd.org/papers/strlcpy-paper.ps http://www.openbsd.org/papers/strlcpy-slides.ps I think each function is well thought out and I think they'd be a great