Hallo,
I wanted to change my $firewall_script to be able to stop the boot and
go to single user mode. So I added "kill -TERM $$" (like in some other
rc.d scripts).
But the system failed to go to singel user mode, I got only "can't get
/dev/console for controlling terminal: Permission denied".
If
* albi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-27 01:13 +0200]:
> guys... please use the official portsclean ! :)
>
> included in the sysutils/portupgrade
>
> portsclean -h
> portsclean 2.0.1 (2006/06/13)
>
> usage: portsclean [-hCDDiLnPPQQq]
>
> -h, --help Show this message
> -C, --workc
* Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-13 08:13 +1100]:
> Note that whilst increasing the DD blocksize will speed up the
> transfer, it will also increase the amount of collateral damage when a
> hard error occurs. If you rummage around the ports or tools tree,
> you'll find a utility (its na
* Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-24 19:29 -0800]:
> M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >The real reason that they are there is that ttyd waits for carrier
> >detect, while cua doesn't.
>
> Non-blocking open followed by block on read/write and/or select dealt
> with that long ago.
But can you use
* Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-17 16:48 -0700]:
> I am trying to allow _all users_ on CLIENT to login to
> SERVER without a password.
Is your ssh setuid root? Is UsePrivilegedPort set?
UsePrivilegedPort
Specifies whether to use a privileged port for outgoing connec-
* Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-10 23:52 -0400]:
> I was hoping for some option in fsck to allow an alternate lost+found
> directory on another device, but no such luck. Is there anything else
> that I'm overlooking? I'm willing to try anything since I'm doing all
> this on a jun
* Fernando Gleiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-03 13:04 -0300]:
> I need to control some external hardware with a small program in
> FreeBSD. I thought about using the 8 data bits of the parallel port
> for sending the control bits to the hardware.
> The hardware is a very simple combinational lo
* José de Paula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-25 18:03 -0300]:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:15:04 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > There are some options which can pose a security risk, including but not
> > limited to cdpath, tempdir, path and shell. You should make a list
* Anton Alin-Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-24 21:27 +0300]:
> tmp = (char *) malloc(strlen(s)); // line 68
Hmm, you need strlen(s)+1 bytes to store the string -- don't forget
the trailing null byte.
Nicolas
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
* Avleen Vig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-11 13:34 -0800]:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:24:38PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > Now, who wants to give this a try?
> >
> > OK, I tried now the following:
> >
> > I made copies of the 4.9 RELEASE Flop
* Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-11 11:02 -0800]:
> If you could make this work such that you just stuffed GENERIC and the
> mfsroot onto however many floppies it takes, I think that would almost
> certaintly solve re's problems with floppies (i.e. if all they had to do
> when the kernel
* Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-11 10:19 +0100]:
> Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Understood. I just think saying "let's get rid of floppies" is
> > shooting a dog that happens to be near to hand because you don't like
> > that dog, to stretch the analogy.
>
> I d
* Richard Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-09 20:59 -0500]:
> Richard Coleman wrote:
> >I apologize if this is a dumb question. But rather than using two
> >floppies during the install process, why not three or four?
> >
> >Richard Coleman
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sorry, I just got caught up
* Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-09 00:02 -0700]:
> Well, except when mfsroot.gz becomes too large to fit on a single
> floppy. Right now it is about 90k away from that. What happens when
> mount_nfsv4 gets put on there? John Baldwin and I already spent a
> day over the holiday break ma
* Adil Katchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-06 17:01 -0500]:
> I don't follow, what do you mean?
A file with mode rwr-- owned by root:group1 could be read by
anyone who is not in group1.
Nicolas
Confusing quote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas Rachinsky [mai
* Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-06 18:11 +]:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:14:06AM -0500, Adil Katchi wrote:
> > I was just wondering if anyone has any ideas how it's possible for a user
> > that belongs to multiple groups to somehow limit his or her own capabilities
> > by using
* Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-31 21:16 +0100]:
> Maybe I'm not understanding your intentions, but isn't that
> already possible using "set | sed -n '/^foo_/s/=.*//p'"?
>
> Or do you want to avoid external programs? In that case it
> would be a little bit more difficult to do, but i
* Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-02 17:34 -0400]:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:11:32PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-02 11:56 -0400]:
> > > I seem to remember calling "panic" from ddb a
* Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-02 11:56 -0400]:
> I seem to remember calling "panic" from ddb actually does
> something strange. Try "call boot(1)" or "call boot" instead.
>
> Does anyone have a grasp on an alternate way of panicing a 4.7-R
> kernel?
kill -6 1
___
* Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-07 00:46 -0700]:
> but i because the string of actions is used in several places,
> I would love to find a way to group actions into a single
> variable and then write something like this
>
> actions="allow 'deny log' 'pipe 10'"
> for act in $
* Paolo Pisati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-01 23:01 +0200]:
>
> I'm trying to reproduce a bug of my system, and create a dump but,
> just after my system rebooted, at the end of the
> boot process, savecore found a seek problem or something like
> that and the vmcore created was of only 10 byte
* Sean Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-17 02:23 -0700]:
> Greetings,
>
> The fact that FreeBSD does not beep after it finishes shutting down has
> costed me dozens of hours of reformatting inconsistent filesystems, and
> probably all sorts of little bits of data loss which I'm just unaware
* Dan Arlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-14 14:40 -0400]:
> dumb question: extra "&" in the previous post?
>
> why do both this
> > qsort(&array, NUM_INTS, sizeof(*array),
> > (int (*)(const void *, const void *)) comp);
> and this
> qsort(array, NUM_INTS, sizeof(*array),
> (int (*)(const voi
* Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-06 18:04 -0400]:
> I've been beating my head for hours against a wall trying to research
> this:
>
> Under FreeBSD (4.5-RELEASE), with an ATAPI device (/dev/acd0c), how
> can I mount, or otherwise access the data in a 'data track' of a
> 'multimedia C
* Koroush Saraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 09:56:39 -0800]:
> Hi All,
> I would like to upgrade a bunch of FreeBSD4.3 computers to FreeBSD 4.5.
> Following the FreeBSD handbook I have setup a computer as an ftp server to
> serve the contents of the CD4_5_1 as the root for anonymous FTP.
> I l
Hello,
I hope this mail is appropriate for this mailinglist.
I have a question regarding a pr I've submitted. I've made the
mistake to submit it without a patch. One week later I wrote a
patch, and submitted it in a followup, but I fear that everybody
interessted in the PR had already looked at
* On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:38:42PM +0200,
* Vladimir Terziev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think, I should refine my question ...
>
> How can I understand, when the startup scripts are going to be runned, which menu
>item is choosed ?
Does the output of "sysctl kern.bootfile" and kldstat hel
Hallo,
I think there is an bug either in libutil's login function or in
ppp. If you login via a port not in /etc/ttys (for example, i4brbch0)
with ppp and utmp is enabled (the default) then ppp calls login()
from libutil, login writes an entry to wtmp but not to utmp, because
i4brbch0 is not in
28 matches
Mail list logo
