* Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031208 12:43]:
> Thus spake Garance A Drosihn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06/12/03 03:31]:
> > From the above description, it sounds like you are running
> > on a 5.1 system, and you are trying to compile a 5.2 kernel.
> > Is this true?
> >
> > If the system you are on
* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 15:18]:
> H. Which Linux would be most compatible?
>
> At 14:12 10/31/2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> >f7173a.jpg Re Kylix in FreeBSD1.ems >FreeBSD1.ems <0880.0002>>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
&g
* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 14:45]:
> Does this mean that one could possibly develop some GUI programs
> on Linux, them compile them to run on FreeBSD? Or, can one only
> compile command line apps?
This should, in theory, be possible. Kylix links against Qt and some
additional CLX runtim
* jasaorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 04:59]:
> Somebody uses Kylix in FreeBSD?
> What is the performance?
The IDE doesn't run under FreeBSD. I worked on it a bit over this
summer when the most recent Kylix came out, and it appears to rely on
too many Linux-isms.
The command-line tools work just
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 21:27]:
> True, we could probably do it. I guess we'd have to generate a few
> random and unlikely queries, try them, and see if all/most of them
> resolve to the same address. Or maybe the to the same small set of
> addresses, depending on how determin
* Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:22]:
> I found most of the discussion seems to be going on on NANOG.
> (Apparently they're not the first, BTW; some CC TLDs have been doing it
> for a while, as have some of the new TLDs like .museum. It's just that
> it was a noise-level problem
* Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:21]:
> * M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:12]:
> > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
> > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
> > fi
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:14]:
> On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
> > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
> > filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in th
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:12]:
> I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base
> system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to
> filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name
> servers in the world to do somethi
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 16:46]:
> On 16 Sep 2003 at 10:23, Clifton Royston wrote:
>
> > In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack
> > to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone
> > transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peer
* William Michael Grim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 14:46]:
> What the hell are you talking about? Thanks for not giving us any info
> about your problem.
I suspect he means:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/337662/2003-09-13/2003-09-19/0
--Mike
__
I'm currently running several -CURRENT systems with libc_r mapped to
libthr via libmap.conf. One is running postfix and BIND8 (I'm planning
to upgrade to 9 this weekend). The other's running KDE but has GNOME
installed as well.
I'd be happy to do performance testing with the various thread
libra
* Andrew Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030712 01:39]:
> if [ "$variables" != "" ]; then
> echo "portupgrade -m '$variables' $progname"
> (portupgrade -m \'$variables\' $progname)
> else
> echo "portupgrade $progname"
> (portupgrade $progname)
> fi
>
- Original Message -
From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: D_KQFILTER & ltmdm: Patch for review?
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Mike Edenfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
14 matches
Mail list logo
