Re: FBSD 5-CURRENT: Kernel Makefile.inc1 Error

2003-12-08 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031208 12:43]: > Thus spake Garance A Drosihn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06/12/03 03:31]: > > From the above description, it sounds like you are running > > on a 5.1 system, and you are trying to compile a 5.2 kernel. > > Is this true? > > > > If the system you are on

Re: Kylix in FreeBSD

2003-10-31 Thread Michael Edenfield
* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 15:18]: > H. Which Linux would be most compatible? > > At 14:12 10/31/2003, Michael Edenfield wrote: > >f7173a.jpg Re Kylix in FreeBSD1.ems >FreeBSD1.ems <0880.0002>> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii &g

Re: Kylix in FreeBSD

2003-10-31 Thread Michael Edenfield
* W. D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 14:45]: > Does this mean that one could possibly develop some GUI programs > on Linux, them compile them to run on FreeBSD? Or, can one only > compile command line apps? This should, in theory, be possible. Kylix links against Qt and some additional CLX runtim

Re: Kylix in FreeBSD

2003-10-31 Thread Michael Edenfield
* jasaorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031031 04:59]: > Somebody uses Kylix in FreeBSD? > What is the performance? The IDE doesn't run under FreeBSD. I worked on it a bit over this summer when the most recent Kylix came out, and it appears to rely on too many Linux-isms. The command-line tools work just

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 21:27]: > True, we could probably do it. I guess we'd have to generate a few > random and unlikely queries, try them, and see if all/most of them > resolve to the same address. Or maybe the to the same small set of > addresses, depending on how determin

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Clifton Royston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:22]: > I found most of the discussion seems to be going on on NANOG. > (Apparently they're not the first, BTW; some CC TLDs have been doing it > for a while, as have some of the new TLDs like .museum. It's just that > it was a noise-level problem

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:21]: > * M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:12]: > > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base > > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to > > fi

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:14]: > On 16-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote: > > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base > > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to > > filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in th

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 20:12]: > I think we should put a filter for this nonsense into the base > system. Hack the resolve to filter out the adddress, and hack bind to > filter it out too. that way we can leverage our position in the name > servers in the world to do somethi

Re: Any workarounds for Verisign .com/.net highjacking?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 16:46]: > On 16 Sep 2003 at 10:23, Clifton Royston wrote: > > > In the meantime I'm trying to figure out if there's some simple hack > > to disregard these wildcard A records, short of requesting zone > > transfers of the root nameservers (e.g. via peer

Re: OpenSSH flaw #23515 - what is the workaround, and is there an exploit ?

2003-09-16 Thread Michael Edenfield
* William Michael Grim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030916 14:46]: > What the hell are you talking about? Thanks for not giving us any info > about your problem. I suspect he means: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/337662/2003-09-13/2003-09-19/0 --Mike __

Re: Call for thread testers

2003-08-29 Thread Michael Edenfield
I'm currently running several -CURRENT systems with libc_r mapped to libthr via libmap.conf. One is running postfix and BIND8 (I'm planning to upgrade to 9 this weekend). The other's running KDE but has GNOME installed as well. I'd be happy to do performance testing with the various thread libra

Re: portupgrade

2003-07-12 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Andrew Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030712 01:39]: > if [ "$variables" != "" ]; then > echo "portupgrade -m '$variables' $progname" > (portupgrade -m \'$variables\' $progname) > else > echo "portupgrade $progname" > (portupgrade $progname) > fi >

Re: D_KQFILTER & ltmdm: Patch for review?

2003-03-04 Thread Michael Edenfield
- Original Message - From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:49 PM Subject: Re: D_KQFILTER & ltmdm: Patch for review? > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Mike Edenfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr