On 24 June 2010 11:06, Mohammed Farrag wrote:
> @ Matt
> Thanx for ur reply Matt.
> /
> FreeBSD is already a very modular system and the traditional way (a
> traditional way) to build for embedded systems is to follow the
> NanoBSD build method (
On 12 June 2010 12:02, Chargen wrote:
> Sir, first of all: I'm no expert in this field but I've seen your document
> and I'm still wondering why you should impose such a design.
>
> I suppose it's well thought of but still I'm a bit opposed to binary
> configuration files because I think has to be
2 matches
Mail list logo
