ANSI compliance, gcc(1) and FreeBSD

2000-07-29 Thread Mark Ovens
Apologies if this is the wrong list for this question but it seems the best place to get a *definitive* answer. In the ANSI Standard (K&R 2e, A7.14 & A7.15) it states that, in the case of the ``&&'' operator, the right operand is evaluated only if the left operand evaluates to non-zero, and, for

Bug in ioctl() [Was: Help needed with ioctl() calls]

2000-02-19 Thread Mark Ovens
ntly set to 88:88 % mixer pcm 84:84 Setting the mixer pcm to 84:84. % mixer pcm Mixer pcm is currently set to 85:85 % On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 02:55:18PM +0000, Mark Ovens wrote: > # uname -a > FreeBSD marder-1 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: > Fri Feb 18 18:14:43 GMT 2000 >

Re: Intel Merced FreeBSD???

1999-08-27 Thread Mark Ovens
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 06:29:21PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > marder-1:/usr/marko{57}% ./a.out > > short == 2 > > int == 4 > > long == 4 > > long long == 8 > > marder-1:/usr/marko{57}% > > But on the Alpha: > > j...@beast-> ./foo > short == 2 > int == 4 > long == 8 > long long == 8 >

Re: Intel Merced FreeBSD???

1999-08-27 Thread Mark Ovens
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 08:45:31PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote: > Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > Microsoft needs a "business quality" version of Windows, > > which it claims is Windows/2000. That version of Windows > > could benefit from a 64-bit port, if for marketing only; but > > I don'

Re: Intel Merced FreeBSD???

1999-08-27 Thread Mark Ovens
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 06:29:21PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > marder-1:/usr/marko{57}% ./a.out > > short == 2 > > int == 4 > > long == 4 > > long long == 8 > > marder-1:/usr/marko{57}% > > But on the Alpha: > > jkh@beast-> ./foo > short == 2 > int == 4 > long == 8 > long long == 8 >

Re: Intel Merced FreeBSD???

1999-08-27 Thread Mark Ovens
On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 08:45:31PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote: > Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > Microsoft needs a "business quality" version of Windows, > > which it claims is Windows/2000. That version of Windows > > could benefit from a 64-bit port, if for marketing only; but > > I don