Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> Hi,
>
> Why should LISTs only be forward traversable? The following piece of
> code make lists backward traversable:
No objection to the concept.
But...
> /sys/sys/queue.h:
>
> +#define LIST_PREV(head,elm,field) \
> + (((elm) == LIST_FIRST(head)) ? ((__typeof(elm
Sam Leffler writes:
>I asked a certain person to add the obsd sysctl long ago but it never
>happened.
That would be me.
And it wouldn't be the first time a ball got dropped. I'll get to
it. :-]
M
--
Mark R V Murray
What is the most interesting question you have asked?
What, if any, was the ans
ot with
the greatest possible efficiency." (Paraphrased)
I've typed "rm -rf *" in the wrong place. ONCE. I learned Unix-fu from that
experience. Now, if I type "rm ", I wake up.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
braries (e.g. llib-lc.ln) for
> all the libs in "/usr/src/lib"?
yes.
In current use
WANT_LINT= yes
in /etc/make.conf. This won't work in STABLE; I haven't MFCed it.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[E
YACINE GHANJAOUI writes:
> Anyone help me how to untar a file with this extention file.tar.bz2 ?
> Thanks,
This is really questions@ material, but...
$ tar -y
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis
be done
autonomously (or as autonomously as possible). You will not get
paid, you may not get thanked, but you will have the satisfaction
of actually getting something done, and if you like FreeBSD as much
as I do, that is an end in itself!
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
__
t; Thank You
> Jessem.
>
> _______
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ible here,
even with weird/theoretical architectures like 256-bit machines. Doesn't
it make sense just to presume that out-of-range is impossible, and recode
for default "if (sizeof(x) == 1) return x;" (ignore syntax) ?
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
ke the dynamic loading of drivers easier.
I really like to concept of configuring things with vi(1), instead of
with gcc :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
maya Haddad writes:
> would you help me in writing network LKM under linux kernel 2.4, small examol
> e would be good.
You sent this to a FreeBSD list, you need to find a Linux list instead.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PRO
file
> 2. autoheader // got a bunch of warnings but no errors
> 3. ./configure --with-pam --with-s-key// PAM was configured, but S/Key
> wasn't.. dunno why yet
> 4. make sshd // below are the errors I got after a bunch of warnings
No.
That is NOT how its built.
Look at src/s
r this topic in the archives. It has been discussed
VERY many times.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 04:46:10PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> +> We are currently being attacked by an individual who is attempting
> +> to mass-subscribe our lists to other mailing lists.
> +>=20
> +> PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF THIS M
Hi
We are currently being attacked by an individual who is attempting
to mass-subscribe our lists to other mailing lists.
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF THIS MAIL! I am taking care of it.
Thank you for your co-operation. :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
nd if not,
> you shouldn't make such accusations.
He admitted to it.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
choices. It's up to you to set up your own
> MUA and filters to cater to your own pickiness.
Amen!
Can we get back on topic now, please? :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
default case, and it breaks Much(tm) if you don't
include it. The kernel-building individual would have had to have made
a decision to not include the RNG, and as such is assumed to know what
she is doing.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is looks like a bug in the linux-base port. I'll file a PR.
Indeed. Good move.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> Sorry, here is the rest:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Here is the output of the `dd` command using urandom:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
t=1 | hexdump
> >-C
> > > > > > > > > 1+0 records in
> > > > > > > > > 1+0 records out
> > > > > > > > > a0 69 1a 7c 8f 32 e5 21 ae 7a 33 14 68 0b 8e a6
> >
gt; > > >... etc. Looking good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > $ ls -l /dev/*rand*
> > > > > > > crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel2, 3 Sep 3 21:46 /dev/random
> > > > > > > crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel2, 4 Sep
2, 4 Sep 3 21:46 /dev/urandom
> > > >
> > > >Also good.
> > > >
> > > > > > > So then, as root I ran: `chmod 0666 /dev/stdout` and then I ran
> >your
> > > > > >`dd`
> > > > > > > command and got:
&g
gt; > > command and got:
> > > > >
> > > > > $ dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/stdout bs=512 count=1 | hexdump -C
> > > > > 0+0 records in
> > > > > 0+0 records out
> > > > > 0 bytes transferred in 0.000
your keyboard?
I'm trying to see if /dev/random can be persuaded to give _any_
aoutput at all.
Maybe do it on a vty instead of in X.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ve a ls -l /dev/*random.
> >
> > > however I tried that, and now when I try to ssh or scp from a non root
> >user
> > > inside the jail, I get:
> > >
> > > "Host key verification failed"
> > >
> > > Does anyone know why this ha
w why this happens, why it didn't happen prior to 4.6.2, and
> how I can fix it ?
The random device has not changed, but the OpenSSL code has. Maybe OpenSSL's
internal PRNG is doing something naughty.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsu
")
On Current (5.0+) it is in src/sys/dev/null/ and is much cleaner. :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
at Walnut Creek.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
STDC__",
> yacc/skeleton.c:"#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__",
> yacc/skeleton.c:"#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__",
>
>
> --
> -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "19
e understood, involving
> just defined(), !, &&, ||, and brackets.
>
> If anyone is interested I'd appreciate some testing, and it
> would be nice to get it committed eventually.
Ooooh! :-)
Yes please!
I'll look at this.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: th
fort to get
> up to speed on -CURRENT so that we can be ready to use it later this year.
Also - have you looked at STABLE's /dev/urandom?
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
eBSD last Summer.
:-) You may be pleasantly surprised :-)
M
(Thanks for the sources!)
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
em up a little and submit them as a PR, but have
> not had time to. If you're interested I can send you the patches and you
> can give them a try.
Hi.
Please send me what you have.
Thanks!
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send m
the environment while
> .xsession is being executed.
>
> Combinations of using "sufficient" and "required" for pam_ssh and
> pam_unix do not seem to affect things.
Nor should they :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_Warning: this .s
across several machine independant files.
This has not been fixed. I could look at it (I am the author of that)
and look for a solution. It may take a bit of time.
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O
> would someone (Mark ?) finally remove this:
>
> pam_rootok: pam_sm_authenticate: Refused; not superuser
>
> I think it should be sent to the debug output, not a terminal. It's
> quite annoying ...
Mergemaster.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Un
it coming soon.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> I think Mark Murray is still sitting on the patch I did for this very
> thing. Check the -hackers mail archives. It was about 2-3 Months
> ago, so it may not even patch cleanly anymore against -CURRENT.
I committed this today!
Apologies for the delay.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning:
s build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing
> the support in other programs. How does that sounds?
Wonderful!
If you need repo-copying done, I'm your man!
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
bly double-up as K4 ones, I'll fix this.
(I think we are really close, BTW).
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi
Could you people please take this flamewar off our lists?
Thanks!
M
>
> --part1_f8.65bd20b.278a2f74_boundary
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> In a message dated 1/7/2001 11:27:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
ike to run TLS for SMTP and postfix. The mail volumes will benefit
> from hardware crypto. I really prefer to stay with Free, vs. Open.
Quite. :-)
Please don't ask anything more than your "quarterly query"; that way I won't
have to lie to you. :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
Warnin
r team sends out an
announcement (cryptograhically signed of course) letting folks
know what identity (fingerprint) to expect.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Actually, you can make it a lot better:
If the lockfile exists, then kill -0 the PID to see if it is still live.
If not, blow away the lockfile. If still alive and older than N minutes,
blow away the PID and break the lock.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send ma
that the lock can be blown away if needed.
Works like a charm.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
x27;s wrong. There was a time that we
were very lax about confirming the server public keys.
The last round of changes have all been confirmed by digital
signature by well-known server administrators.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
> > Anyone want to have a look at this? It's from the GNU awk maintainer.
>
> Without knowing which random.c it was, it's hard to judge :-) Also not
> knowing what the intended use is, it's hard to recommend something.
I'd guess src/lib/libc/stdlib/random.c
> > Yes, it is this simple :-).
>
> Can you get it ready for 4.2? I'd like to see us be able to
> run bind9 in the next release.
Sure. I'll see if I can do it in the next couple of hours.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubsc
+ }
>
> /*
>* Even inspecting the state is privileged, since it gives a hint
>
> Did I miss part of the OpenBSD delta? This looks too easy. :(
>
> --
> -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
>
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> It patches cleanly against -STABLE and -CURRENT, and only touches
> libcrypt. Take a look at it, feedback/patches are welcome, and if you
> like it, maybe someone can integrate it into -CURRENT. (I don't know
> whose dept. this would be -- Mark Murray perhap
> > If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
> > Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
>
> I'll take a look...
Looks like perl brokenness. The missing boot_DynaLoader is in DynaLoader.a,
but there is no way of linking it in.
M
--
Ma
> If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
> Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
I'll take a look...
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
> a few questions:
>
> You should talk to Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] who has done alot of
> work with the current implementation of our random device.
I am currently rewriting FreeBSD's /dev/random device to use Schneier's
Yarrow algorithm. Some of it is in current, and
__IDSTRING().
Bah.
Only three things use __COPYRIGHT; ftp(d?), routed and make. None of them
use \n's like you do.
> I've sent private mail to Peter, who introduced this implementation of
> __IDSTRING in rev 1.26 of cdefs.h.
Compatibility measure?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the ant
you get a comparitive "cc -S test.c" on each box, and see what the
.ident line out of test.s looks like in each case?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
aybe I am.
Did your _exact_ sample program fail on NetBSD in the same way that
it failed on FreeBSD?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
he multi-line string. You may need to
double-escape the \n's (like \\n) to get them into the .ident
line symbolically.
(I just checked - it worked!)
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> Why not just use cvsup? It is already installed and running on internat
> and the firewall is already configured to allow it through.
CVSUP only covers that which is already in CVS. The FTP stuff is
what this chap is looking for.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement
> > Mark Murray would know :-)
> >
> > I think there's a lot of stale cruft on ftp.internat.freebsd.org which
> > doesn't need to be mirrored - Mark could probably tell us all which bits
> > are suitable for mirroring (this should be documented somewhere
whereas Datafellows meand Kerberos5. This would be a mistake made by
OpenBSD, and one that is easy to fix.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> > ...a sys/crypt/ directory should hold their DES code. :-)
>^
> Shouldn't this be crypto ? That is what I see if I look on internat
> in the /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup directory.
So it should, and in the patch that I have, it is :-).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join th
> And I wonder if I can send the patches to lists to solicite
> comments.
Send them to me if you like :-)
> By the way, all crypto stuff are put under the sys/crypto dir
> in the patch. Should some of them put under sys/libkern instead?
No. Please leave them in sys/crypto/
M
--
terior motive is to checkin netgrapph/ng_mppc.c which adds
> MPPE/MPPC support for PPTP. However it's useless without an [A]RC4
> implementation.
I'd like DES, arc4 and MD5/SHA for Yarrow.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send
> Does anybody know why ( i know that the directory /R/stage/trees/krb/
> does not exist , but the directory /R/stage/trees/krb4/ do exist ) ??
For some reason, your src/release/* area is not getting updated.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsub
e the IPSec stuff is around. I expect to
be able to tweak it so that this his is not too heavy, and customisable.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
0A, once the IPSec stuff is around. I expect to
be able to tweak it so that this his is not too heavy, and customisable.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
all
passing the buck very fast nowadays.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
all
passing the buck very fast nowadays.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
.c
> src/sys/crypto/des/podd.h
> src/sys/crypto/des/sk.h
> src/sys/crypto/des/spr.h
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
.c
> src/sys/crypto/des/podd.h
> src/sys/crypto/des/sk.h
> src/sys/crypto/des/spr.h
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
.
Perhaps something similar could be invented for src/crypto? We'd need
to make the distibution machinery understand that, but I don't see
too much a problem there.
I have no strong feelings about src/crypto/sys or src/sys/crypto.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.ca
contrib, but contains code that may
get Americans into trouble if they export it, so I maintain a copy
in South Africa (on internat.freebsd.org).
I'll be very happy to work with you on this one.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
.
Perhaps something similar could be invented for src/crypto? We'd need
to make the distibution machinery understand that, but I don't see
too much a problem there.
I have no strong feelings about src/crypto/sys or src/sys/crypto.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.ca
contrib, but contains code that may
get Americans into trouble if they export it, so I maintain a copy
in South Africa (on internat.freebsd.org).
I'll be very happy to work with you on this one.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
serious problems.
Inflicting it on "standard idiots" to check for install problems is a
human-engineering aproach you could also take? Impossible to automate,
though.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with &q
ing" thing
A regression test to make sure that the OS is not broken before you
inflict it on your colleagues/engineers?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
serious problems.
Inflicting it on "standard idiots" to check for install problems is a
human-engineering aproach you could also take? Impossible to automate,
though.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
e) be well tested with a make world with
NFS mounted disks, possibly using another FreeBSD box as
a router for extra stress.
Is this what you are looking for?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "uns
ing" thing
A regression test to make sure that the OS is not broken before you
inflict it on your colleagues/engineers?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e) be well tested with a make world with
NFS mounted disks, possibly using another FreeBSD box as
a router for extra stress.
Is this what you are looking for?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
be root. Processes that require mandatory locking must revoke
superuser before attempting locks.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
be root. Processes that require mandatory locking must revoke
superuser before attempting locks.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
t; So %1101 should become either %1 or %1000.
Shift a bit until it becomes greater than (or less than) the number
in question.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
t; So %1101 should become either %1 or %1000.
Shift a bit until it becomes greater than (or less than) the number
in question.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
> "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?
I strongly _request_ such a log message.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
> So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
> "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?
I strongly _request_ such a log message.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
> > The current rush of things crypto has piqued my interest, so I am
> > hammering away quite hard these days.
>
> Well, would it be useful for me to commit the KERBEROS -> KERBEROS4
> changes?
Er, no; please submit them to me as patches. :-)
Thanks!
M
--
Mark M
> What is holding back the work in the userland stuff then? Time?
No; the lack thereof ;-)
The current rush of things crypto has piqued my interest, so I am
hammering away quite hard these days.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
FTPD should be
PAMmable, likewise the r.*d's. The userland ftp and telnets can
have both (Isuspect), and the r-utils also.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> > The current rush of things crypto has piqued my interest, so I am
> > hammering away quite hard these days.
>
> Well, would it be useful for me to commit the KERBEROS -> KERBEROS4
> changes?
Er, no; please submit them to me as patches. :-)
Thanks!
M
--
Mark M
> What is holding back the work in the userland stuff then? Time?
No; the lack thereof ;-)
The current rush of things crypto has piqued my interest, so I am
hammering away quite hard these days.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
FTPD should be
PAMmable, likewise the r.*d's. The userland ftp and telnets can
have both (Isuspect), and the r-utils also.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
>
> I have questions.
Me.
I will be bringiong in Heimdal (when it interoperates with MIT-K5).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd
> Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
>
> I have questions.
Me.
I will be bringiong in Heimdal (when it interoperates with MIT-K5).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
> Why not just wait and bring the openssl library in?
Er - I do't think that will happen. Not for a while.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> Why not just wait and bring the openssl library in?
Er - I do't think that will happen. Not for a while.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> DES, Mark, -hackers!
>
> How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive,
> which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the
> directory is not considered an error.
Cool! Do it, I say!
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM
e international DES library (for
> other encryption algorithms, pick a freely available implmenetation such
> as the one from openssl).
This makes the most sense. Thrash it out as a port, and if that works,
we can bring it into both repositories.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement:
> DES, Mark, -hackers!
>
> How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive,
> which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the
> directory is not considered an error.
Cool! Do it, I say!
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM
e international DES library (for
> other encryption algorithms, pick a freely available implmenetation such
> as the one from openssl).
This makes the most sense. Thrash it out as a port, and if that works,
we can bring it into both repositories.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement:
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
