Hi,
I wonder if this is an interesting library for
FreeBSD for some userland applications. Perhaps an
embedded app running on very low end hardware might
benefit. Interesting use of an old idea in any case.
http://www.openldap.org/pub/hyc/mdm-slides.pdf
- Mark
On 20 Aug 2012, at 10:12, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans,
>> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot
>> remember Simon got an answer for.
>
> I gave a clear answer. I
On 10 Jul 2012, at 08:12, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 14:47, Mark Blackman wrote:
>> I never use '-t' with dig. drill *told* me I should use '-t'
>> then completely failed to acknowledge I had done so.
>
> Have y
On 9 Jul 2012, at 23:01, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mark Blackman writes:
>> I never use '-t' with dig. drill *told* me I should use '-t' then
>> completely failed to acknowledge I had done so.
>>
>> Marks-Macbook% drill -t www.google.co
On 9 Jul 2012, at 22:37, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Mark Blackman writes:
>> my DNS resolution is broken, so my ports can't download any tarballs.
>> In this case, I reach for dig to see which part of the DNS resolution
>> chain is failing me.
>>
>> A
On 9 Jul 2012, at 22:01, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 06:45, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
>> Indeed, 'dig' and 'host' must be present and working as expected
>> in a minimally installed system.
>
> So if you don't like the versions that get i
On 9 Jul 2012, at 08:34, Avleen Vig wrote:
>
> Agreed. The idea of a "minimally functional system" itself might be
> flawed. Do you consider having `dig` and `host` essential in a
> minimally functioning system? I do.
> It's pretty f'king hard to resolve problems with installing the
> bind-utils
On 5 Mar 2012, at 12:30, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello Elman,
>
>
> None of us was born a seer so you might want to tell the model of the
> network card.
>
>
>
> On 3/5/12 12:16 PM, Elman wrote:
>> Hallo hacker.
>>
>> I try install freebsd 9.0 in server Hp proliant ML370 G6, in process
>>
On 27 Jan 2012, at 03:26, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:52:44PM +0000, Mark Blackman wrote:
>> I suspect poor old RE is putting too much work into BETAs and RCs for
>> point releases.
>
> The counter-argument is that we have a lot more leeway to ma
On 26 Jan 2012, at 22:49, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:23:43PM +0000, Mark Blackman wrote:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/release-proc.html
>>
>> "New releases of FreeBSD are released from the -STABLE branch at
&
On 26 Jan 2012, at 18:22, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:49:22 am Mark Blackman wrote:
>> a) who is "the project" in this case
>> and
>> b) what does it take for a release to be a release?
>
> I'll answer the two toget
On 26 Jan 2012, at 14:37, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:33:40 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 19 January 2012 09:47, Mark Saad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> What could I do to help make 7.5-RELEASE a reality ?
>>>
>>
>> Put your hand up and volunteer to run the 7.5-RELEASE release
On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:59, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 18 January 2012 22:53, Mark Blackman wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:50, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 January 2012 22:31, Mark Blackman wrote:
>>>
>>>> 10.0 - Nov 2013
>&g
On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:50, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 18 January 2012 22:31, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
>> 10.0 - Nov 2013
>
> I think 10.0 should be released based on feature-readiness and not on
> some arbitrary date…
You can always redefine the feature-set to meet
On 18 Jan 2012, at 11:47, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>
> It strikes me that the first basic plan would be a release schedule, however.
> :-)
7.4 - no further development
8.3 - Mar 2012
9.1 - May 2012
8.4 - July 2012
9.2 - Sep 2012
8.5 - Nov 2012
9.3 - Jan 2013
8.6 - Mar 2013
9.4 - May 2013
8.7
On 17 Jan 2012, at 21:09, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 11:12 AM, John Kozubik wrote:
>> Again, I'm not suggesting more snapshots - I am suggesting more real, bona
>> fide releases. This will help people.
>
> I tend to agree with you. Our release engineering process isn't serving
16 matches
Mail list logo
