derr,"cancel failed!\n");
}
fprintf(stderr,"after cancel, before join...\n");
if(0!=pthread_join(thread,&pthread_param))
{
fprintf(stderr,"join failed!\n");
}
fprintf(stderr,"after join\n");
}
please ask if more details are needed
Tha
;
}
fprintf(stderr,"after cancel, before join...\n");
if(0!=pthread_join(thread,&pthread_param))
{
fprintf(stderr,"join failed!\n");
}
fprintf(stderr,"after join\n");
}
please ask if more details are needed
Thanks in advance,
Louis-Philippe Gagnon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Lots of ideas to try (esp. since I don't need FIFO); thanks!
LPG
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Louis-Philippe Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > From: "Julian Elischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
ypher that. I'd rather have something portable though, and I
would still like to know if what I was doing
should have worked...
Louis-Philippe Gagnon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
lock the file, whole process blocks
(thread 1 is blocked, can't unlock the file : deadlock)
So :
-Is flock() supposed to block the whole process?
-Is my test program wrong?
-Does this look like a bug in libc_r?
-Is there a better (working) way of getting interprocess synchronization in
multi
I finally got around to trying the patch on -stable; I can confirm that it solves the
problem. Thanks again!
Louis-Philippe Gagnon
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Eischen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Louis-Philippe Gagnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: &
Thanks! I'll try it as soon as possible (I don't have a -stable machine ready, and I'd
rather not try my first "make world"
attempts on my production machine...)
Louis-Philippe Gagnon
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Eischen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
[snip]
>
> ERRORS
> If the contents of the env are corrupted, or correspond to an
environment
> that has already returned, the longjmp() routine calls the routine
I interpreted that as referring to the case when we longjmp after the
_function_ that called setjmp has returned, but yes, "
ing libc and libc_r on that machine : no change (though I didn't
expect any)
I also tried the same code in Linux (RedHat 6.1), where it behaves as
expected.
So the questions are :
-Am I doing something obviously wrong?
-Is this a bug?
-Is this a known bug with a known workaround?
Thanks for an
I didn't
expect any)
I also tried the same code in Linux (RedHat 6.1), where it behaves as
expected.
So the questions are :
-Am I doing something obviously wrong?
-Is this a bug?
-Is this a known bug with a known workaround?
Thanks for any help.
Louis-Philippe Gagnon
ps. please don'
10 matches
Mail list logo
