Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8

2003-06-03 Thread Loren James Rittle
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters write: >On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of >> > code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole bunch of fixes for the

Re: to users of threads (GDB support)

2002-02-11 Thread Loren James Rittle
>> Loren Rittle indicated that they were [in a form useful to /usr/ports] Actually, to avoid all confusion, I privately wrote Kip to say that I was able to extract out his updated thread support and apply it to my local mainline binutils tree. That is a bit different than indicating the work is

Report on FreeBSD 4.4 pthread implementation verses boehm-gc

2001-11-08 Thread Loren James Rittle
Hello all, I have ported the most recent version of boehm-gc (6.1-alpha) to FreeBSD/i386 under the auspice of the gcc project (it will be in Hans' 6.1 release and it is on the gcc mainline). I got one notable thing fully configured beyond what is in the ports tree (which is based on 6.0): thread