On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:09:43PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> 2012/1/20 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> I figure this isn't wanted?
> > You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided,
>
> I fix
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:25:42PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I figure this isn't wanted?
You silently ignored part of the notes that were provided, and keep
complete silence on the primary question about non-standard and fractional
nature of the patch.
I see no reason to retype my previous respo
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > > On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
> > > > a field for the FIB isn't as
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01:29AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> > This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
> > man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/on
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:01:29AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> This is an implementation of dup3 for FreeBSD:
> man page here (with a FreeBSD patch coming soon):
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/dup.2.html
>
> Is this implementation correct? If so any objection to adding th
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:53:19PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2011/12/29 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:46:57AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> 2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov :
> >> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:53:42PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
>
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:46:57AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:53:42PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> 2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov :
> >> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:23:58PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> >&g
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 02:53:42PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2011/12/28 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:23:58PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> On 28 December 2011 12:21, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 28/12/2011, at 22:07,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:23:58PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 28 December 2011 12:21, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> >
> > On 28/12/2011, at 22:07, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> Is there a simple way to check for existence of a driver? I could
> >> even check for /dev/sndstat, though that doesn't seem eleg
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 05:05:04PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/12/27 Giovanni Trematerra :
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas
> > wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I've been playing with two things in DragonFly that might be of interest
> >> here.
> >>
> >> Thing #1 :=
> >>
> >>
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is there a way, from userspace, to get the amount of memory a given
> process currently has swapped out?
The VM does not track memory 'per process'. Simplifying to the point
where the statement becomes false, it assigns th
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 02:17:43PM +0100, joris dedieu wrote:
> 2011/12/2 Alexander Kabaev :
> > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:22:57 +0100
> > joris dedieu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here is a patch I use to prevent loading a shared object from a noexec
> >> mountpoint. It's an easy way, I found, afte
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:44:55PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:10:41 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > KB> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Golu
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:47:54PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:10:41 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/env.sys.3.patch
>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 10:37:46PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 21:45:53 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wro
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:44:43 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >> KB> I think that the aux vector must be naturally aligned. You can return
> >> KB> ENOEXEC early if vptr is not aligned.
>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 05:40:22PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:58:01 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> +if (error == EFAULT) {
> KB> +for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> KB> +
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 11:27:37PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> I think it is better to use sys/elf.h over the machine/elf.h.
>
> KB> Please change the comment for PROC_AUXV_MAX to "Safety limit o
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 09:07:11AM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> For PROC_ARG and PROC_ENV, you blindly trust the read values of the arg
> and
> KB> env vector sizes. This can easily cause kernel pa
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:49:48 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:32:39PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> What do you think about the attached p
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 01:32:39PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:24:51 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:13:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:10:05 +0300 Kostik Belous
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 06:54:51PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> So, I have question: what should I do if I need to perofrm ONE
> action, which could block for some time (for example, open file or
> create ALQ)?
>
> I could create thread for this. But it looks strange and too heavy: create
>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Daniel Grech wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am allocating memory from a device driver in the kernel and passing it on
> to another driver. In the other driver it is neccessary for me to determine
> whether the address passed is from user space or kernel space as this
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 05:02:00PM +0400, Alexandr Matveev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using FreeBSD 8.2 on our servers for high load projects.
> When I was preparing system for production I saw strange (as I think)
> behavior,
> that leads to increased load on servers.
>
> If I made truss on httpd
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:13:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:10:05 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> In my opinion, the way to implement the feature is to (re)use
> KB> linprocfs_doargv() and provide another kern.proc sysctl to retrieve th
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 07:57:57PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a patch that makes kvm_uread() read from user space using ptrace(2).
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/kvm_uread.ptrace.patch
>
> With this change 'ps -e' does not requires procfs(5).
>
> Do you like it or ther
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:44:37AM +0200, Harald Servat wrote:
> Dear hackers,
>
> does anyone know if I can measure power consumption of the processor via
> software by using FreeBSD on a Intel Core i5? Any pointer on this, or other
> architectures, will be welcome.
>
> Thank you very much in
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 04:41:45PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> i have few questions.
>
> 1) suppose i map 1TB of address space as anonymous and touch just one
> page. how much memory is used to manage this?
I am not sure how deep the enumeration you want to know, but the first
approximation w
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 04:21:09PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-hackers.
>
> Here are several memory-allocation mechanisms in the kernel. The two
> I'm aware of is MALLOC_DEFINE()/malloc()/free() and uma_* (zone(9)).
>
> As far as I understand, malloc() is general-purpose, b
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:30:06AM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> You might be interested in this PR:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153157&cat=
>
> This does the same thing for userland .symbols files, and teaches gdb
> how to find them.
The patch is not committable as is. In partic
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:50:47AM +0800, Thinker K.F. Li wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I was in trouble for an issue of TLS implementation of FreeBSD. It is
> an issue of ld-elf.so actually. If I have a thread-local variable in
> program, the value of the variable is not consistent after an
> dlopen().
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:48:42AM +0200, "Marc L?rner" wrote:
> Hello,
> what about changing order of callout_reset and uprintf?
> And your timeout isn't 1minute, it's one second!
>
> Regards,
> Marc
>
> >I already did that to ensure timer_event_handler would be called correctly.
> >
> >The resu
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:12:09PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:16:09PM -0600, Charlie Martin wrote:
> >> We're having a crash in some internal code running on FreeBSD 7.2
> >&g
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:16:09PM -0600, Charlie Martin wrote:
> We're having a crash in some internal code running on FreeBSD 7.2
> (specifically 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE and yeah, I know
> it's quite a bit behind) in which after 18-30 hours of running load
> tests, the code pani
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:21:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[skip]
> But I also would like to use this opportunity to discuss how we can
> make it easier to debug such issue as this. I think that this problem
> demonstrates that when we treat certain junk in kernel address value
> as a userland
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:02:19AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> I'm working on adding security methods to camcontrol and have
> come up against a strange issue. It seems that the timeout
> value for cam, at least on ata (ahci), is limited to less than
> 2148 seconds.
>
> This can be seen by run
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/7/30 Kostik Belousov :
> > Second, my proposal contains a flaw. Namely, if some swap device was removed
> > between calls to swap_info and swap_devname calls, we get mangled list.
>
> Ok, I see that you f
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:06:48AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi Kostik,
>
> 2011/7/29 Kostik Belousov :
> > The patch is too hackish, IMHO.
> > I would prefer to have an exported kernel function that fills xswdev
> > by index, used both by vm_swap_info and linpro
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 01:15:59AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please consider this patch, it implements Linux-like /proc/swaps for
> linprocfs.
>
> E.g.
>
> $ cat /proc/swaps
> FilenameTypeSizeUsed
> Priority
> /dev/zvol/dimoni/swap
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:35:44PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:22:34AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:03:35PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:31:36PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> >
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:03:35PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:31:36PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> > 2011/7/25 Andrey V. Elsukov :
> > > On 25.07.2011 10:18, Joe Sciulli wrote:
> > >> Is it possible to mount virtualbox vdi file on the FreeBSD host? This
> > >> appear
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>I will bump revision for stable/8 when merging, but I do not see much
> >>reason to bump on HEAD right now.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> >Uhm I think we can survive without a bump in HEAD. For now we will
> >need to keep our backward-com
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it.
>
> I applied it against our 8.2 based package,
> altered our "clone" to use this new
> interface and run eglibc testsuite. No regression.
>
> Our runtime detection of thi
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:16:28AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>Seems this interface be acceptable ?
> >
> >Looks good to me.
>
> The proposed code changes are in the attached patch.
>
> Proposed wording of addition into RFORK(2):
Below is the patch I intend to commit after you retest it.
I a
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:05:56PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>Should the bit slice be 7 or 8 bits ?
>
> >I propose to go 8 bits, and add the check to be future-proof.
>
> >It seems that we already parse GNU/kFreeBSD brandnote. I think this
> >could be used to distinguish between old behaviou
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:12:15PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >I would instead use a new flag to specify a signal sent on the child
> >death. Like RFTSIGZMB. If flag is not set, SIGCHLD is used. If it is
> >set, the bit slice is used as signal number, 0 means do not send any
> >signal.
> >
> >Pl
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 05:43:23PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>The 1st patch satisfies this. I agree that SIGCHLD part
> >>is not easily readable.
> >The SIGCHLD part is ugly. This is why I am asking about possible ways
> >to overcome this.
>
> We need a way to specify "no signal".
> It can be
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:50:44PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >RFLINUXPTH was used by the linuxthreads port, that was popular in the
> >time of FreeBSD 4.x and may be 5.x to run mysql. I will object against
> >this breakage.
>
> Do I understand correctly that API/ABI backward compatibility with
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 04:23:36PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>>Can you, please, describe the reasoning behind the
> + if (sig == SIGCHLD) sig = 0;
> >>>line ?
> >>
> >>The main reason is backward compatibility.
> >>The original FreeBSD code allows only to select between
> >>SIGUSR1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:27:56PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >>This patch made by Petr Salinger improves compatibility with
> >>LinuxThreads in rfork() syscall. The Linux clone() implementation
> >>allows specifying the signal sent to parent when child terminates
> >>(instead of SIGCHLD).
> >>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> This patch made by Petr Salinger improves compatibility with
> LinuxThreads in rfork() syscall. The Linux clone() implementation
> allows specifying the signal sent to parent when child terminates
> (instead of SIGCHLD).
>
> As the
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 02:07:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/7/3 Kostik Belousov :
> > I think the different workaround is already included in the latest
> > sbuf source. Please see
> > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c?revision=222015&
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 01:47:38PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On arm, ia64, powerpc and sparc, Linux doesn't define a static
> PAGE_SIZE. It can only be obtained via sysconf(). In addition,
> GNU/Hurd doesn't define PAGE_SIZE at all.
>
> This patch improves portability of libsbuf to be built
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:47:38PM -0700, Artem Belevich wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Quite a while back you've posted I/OAT driver. Unfortunately the link
> you posted does not seem to have the drivers any more. Do you still
> have them available somewhere?
>
> Do you know if Intel has technical info on t
reebsd-hackers/2010-August/032549.html
> continued...
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-September/033028.html
> continued...
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-November/033478.html
>
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Kostik Be
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 04:03:26PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:17:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:40 -0700 Sean Bruno
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
> > > jail. Af
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:50:30AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:31:15 am Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > On 5/18/11, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:07AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > >> -- Forwarded
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:07AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Fenghua Yu
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:44 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP
> To: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner ,
> H Peter Anvin , Asit K Mallick
> , Li
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:38:12AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-hackers.
>
>Does FreeBSD have some custom call, which can be used where Linux
> programs uses posix_fadvice() and DARWIN ones fcntl(F_RDADVISE)?
>
>It is like madvise(2) but for file descriptors.
No, it doe
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:44:32AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 9:10:26 am Philip Soeberg wrote:
> > Hi fellow FreeBSD hackers,
> >
> > I've been using the following poor-man's approach in my driver init for
> > ages in an attempt at detecting PAE option on BSD 6 (or grea
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:14:49AM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> Indeed, I may have mixed up terminology. Sorry about that. What I am
> doing (or trying to do) is very simple:
>
> There is a single physical USB device. I have a single device node
> representing it. This device can be opene
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:14:36PM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> >If you have some sort of state that needs to get created on first
> >open and then removed on last close [...] I would still depend on the
> >cdevpriv destructor and use a reference count between open() and the
> >destructor to
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:22:43PM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> >Err, if you use cdevpriv you shouldn't even have a d_close method. All
> >your
> >d_close logic should be in the cdevpriv destructor
>
> I see. There is no documentation for any of this, so I just implemented
> it in the wa
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> >You need to handle all cases in your driver. Fortunately there exists a
> >solution for this already, called USB cdev. See
>
> I went through all the USB drivers with a fine comb (the driver I am
> porting was based on the ol
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 03:49:48PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I should know the answer to this, but... When reading a global kernel
> variable, where its modifications are protected by a mutex, is it
> necessary to get the mutex lock to just read its value?
>
> For example:
> Aif ((
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:40:14PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got an xbox running at my parents' house as a backup MX, among
> other things.
>
> Ages ago I updated it from 7.2 -> 8.1, and I ended up with no end of
> trouble, and finished by restoring a backup. I emailed rink@, al
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 08:54:18PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Jesse Smith wrote:
>
> >I'm interested in working on the "Port prebind from OpenBSD" project
> >mentioned on the FreeBSD Ideas page. (
> >http://wiki.freebsd.org/IdeasPage#head-d28cdd95ca1755d5afe63d653cb4926d4
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 10:12:32AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, March 26, 2011 08:16:46 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2011-Mar-25 08:18:38 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >For modern Intel CPUs you can just assume that the TSCs are in sync across
> > >packages. They also have invarian
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:16:46PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2011-Mar-25 08:18:38 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >For modern Intel CPUs you can just assume that the TSCs are in sync across
> >packages. They also have invariant TSC's meaning that the frequency doesn't
> >change.
>
> Synchro
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:55:59AM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:11:04AM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> >> How can I tell if the Northbridge on a machine has a built-in DMA
> >>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:39:58PM +0800, Xingxing Pan wrote:
> 2011/3/22 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:32:04PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Xingxing Pan wrote:
> >> > 2011/3/21 Chagin Dmitr
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:11:04AM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote:
> How can I tell if the Northbridge on a machine has a built-in DMA
> controller? And if it does, what device would I use to control it?
>
> I ask because I'm working with a PCI card that has a 36-bit physical
> address limit, and t
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:32:04PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Xingxing Pan wrote:
> > 2011/3/21 Chagin Dmitry :
> > >> powerfull script.
> > >>
> > >> Xingxing Pan
> > >
> > > hmm, which script? I think enough amd64, i386 and amd64/ia32.
> > >
> > > I su
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 02:09:58PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2011 01:05 pm, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > >> We definitely do not support configurations with d
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:51:27PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/03/2011 15:56 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:53PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > ...
> >> - set cputicker() has some design bugs. It assumes that the tick freq
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:53PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
> - set cputicker() has some design bugs. It assumes that the tick frequency
> is the same across all CPUs, but the TSC is per-CPU. I have an old SMP
> system with CPUs of different frequency that can demonstrate bugs from
> t
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:56:14PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Mar 16), Thiago Damas said:
> > Hi,
> > without procfs, there is a way to get usertime and systime from a
> > running process?
>
> Try applying the attached patch to ps. I've had it for a while but never
> subm
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:30:00PM -0700, Ravi Murty wrote:
> I haven't, are there specific improvements in this area of the kernel?
First, the 8.2, compared to 8.0, changed the mechanism of delivering
the process-global signal to a thread. Now, the thread to deliver is
selected at the moment of de
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:19:01PM -0300, Danilo Egea wrote:
> The problem is the binutils version, the port try to use the
> binutils-2.21. With the binutils-2.15 (native of the system) works fine.
Rather, it is binutils 2.15 silently creating broken library.
2.21 refuses to do it.
Some object u
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:24:05PM +0900, mmats...@cybernet.co.jp wrote:
> From: Garrett Cooper
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:04:24 -0800
> ::On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, wrote:
> ::> From: Dimitry Andric
> ::> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:39:31 +0100
> ::> ::On 2011-02-22 08:30, gnehzuil wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:06:38PM -0500, Ben Kaduk wrote:
> [replying to the MFC that triggered the connection]
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > Author: brucec
> > Date: Tue Feb 22 17:38:43 2011
> > New Revision: 218953
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/21
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:58:32PM -0800, Yuri wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 15:38, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >That's a major difference. The Linux people decided a while ago that
> >stack alignment should be 16 Byte. GCC effectively forces that down
> >everyone's throat because until at least GCC 4.2 o
d)
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/dvb/linux-dvb-8.patch
>
> (for 8.)
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54:48AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:51:05PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Juergen Lo
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 03:58:05AM -0800, Dr. Baud wrote:
>
>
> > First, do you have a console output during the run ? Is it possible
> > that machine paniced ? If not, were there any kernel messages before>
> > reboot ?
> >
> > Second, what is the process you are dumping ? Can you show at least
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:50:06AM +0100, Mats Lindberg wrote:
> All,
> I have been using a small program /rt) that utilize the sched_setscheduler()
> syscall to set the scheduling policy of a process to SCHED_RR. Been running
> it FBSD 5.x and 6.x. Now when migrating to FBSD 8.1 I get EPERM back a
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:46:05AM -0800, Dr. Baud wrote:
> I've an interesting anomaly I'd appreciate some help with.
>
> As a result of looking at a threading problem I modified gcore
> to dump all memory segments associated with a process;
> basically comment out the "Ignore" conditional i
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:49:52AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Ali Polatel wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I'm the developer of pinktrace - http://dev.exherbo.org/~alip/pinktrace/
> > - a simple ptrace() wrapper
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:42:15AM +0200, Ali Polatel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm the developer of pinktrace - http://dev.exherbo.org/~alip/pinktrace/
> - a simple ptrace() wrapper library for FreeBSD and Linux. I have set up
> a FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT VM today to test various new features recen
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54:48AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:51:05PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I was kinda hoping to be able t
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:10:00PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was kinda hoping to be able to post a correct patch in public but
> getting an answer to ${Subject} seems to be more difficult than I
> thought... :) So, does anyone here know? copyout_map() and
You do not need Giant lock
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:12:34PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:59 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
> > > Probably did something like this:
> > >
> > > ti
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:50:48PM +, Devin Teske wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:31 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor
> > > wrote:
> > &g
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:37:54PM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:05 AM, David Naylor
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 January 2011 06:49:11 Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:40:42 -0500
> >>
> >> Mark Saad wrote:
> >> > Hello Hackers
> >> >
> >> > The NetBSD f
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
> It's in the the subversion tree, under projects/jailconf.
>
> I've got the dependency stuff there (actually turns out to be a large
> chunk of the code). I've got it doing almost everything that rc.d/jail
> does now, though it doesn'
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:44:13PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, January 21, 2011 11:09:10 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Some time ago I faced with a problem booting with 400GB physmem.
> > The problem is that vm.max_proc_mmap type overflows with
> > such high value, and
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:19:22AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Are you talking about BSDoid or FreeDroid?
I got SDK from http://bsdroid.org. No idea what FreeDroid is.
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:58:26PM +01
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Sunday 16 January 2011 13:30:33 Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Hans Petter Selasky
> wrote:
> > > On Sunday 16 January 2011 13:20:39 Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:07 AM,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:34:22PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 13:28, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> >>I've been trying to get an application compiled with gcc 4.5.1 running
> >>on FreeBSD 8.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:57:15PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > I've been trying to get an application compiled with gcc 4.5.1 running
> > on FreeBSD 8.1, but it's been crashing during startup with a SIGBUS.
> > It turns out that
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:19:00PM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
> I've been trying to get an application compiled with gcc 4.5.1 running
> on FreeBSD 8.1, but it's been crashing during startup with a SIGBUS.
> It turns out that the problem is that gcc is issuing SSE
> instructions(in my case, a movdqa)
1 - 100 of 368 matches
Mail list logo
