On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:21:06AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 04:40:58AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> &g
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 04:40:58AM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala
>> > wrote:
>> &g
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 06:54:11PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>>>> I
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 06:54:11PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>>> I'm getting a core dump on 'config -x /boot/kernel/kernel' on 9.1-
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 06:54:11PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> I'm getting a core dump on 'config -x /boot/kernel/kernel' on 9.1-RELEASE
>> i386.
>>
>> Assertion failed: (r != &
I'm getting a core dump on 'config -x /boot/kernel/kernel' on 9.1-RELEASE i386.
Assertion failed: (r != '\0' && ("Char present in the configuration "
"string mustn't be equal to 0")), function kernconfdump, file
/usr/src/usr.sbin/config/main.c, line 710.
I have double checked that my config file
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2013, at 11:55, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> Poking around the /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 I see that there's a variable
>> called "WORLDTMP" that seems to set the location for temporary files
>> du
Poking around the /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 I see that there's a variable
called "WORLDTMP" that seems to set the location for temporary files
during the world build. My question is now:
Is it safe to put WORLDTMP on a ram disk, for example tmpfs(5)?
Looking at the build process it seems to me that
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Justin Edward Muniz
wrote:
>>
>> It seems we already have something similar in the ports[1] collection.
>> There is also a newer version[2] using Qt4 but it seems more limited. It
>> might be worth a look at those first.
>>
>> [1] ports-mgmt/kports
>> [2] ports-mgm
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 14 April 2013 12:15, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> I have to also ask, what would a GUI offer that the command line tools
>> do not offer at the moment?
>
> A GUI.
>
>
That's kind of given :D
But does FreeB
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Justin Edward Muniz
wrote:
>>
>> I think GUI front ends to freebsd-update, portsnap, or pkgng would all be
>> useful.
>>
>> One thing I would look into though, is what PC-BSD offers. They may
>> already have similar things.
>>
>> Very interesting, I am checking out
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>> And yes FreeBSD kernel is huge. doesn't really matter with 1GB or more
>>> RAM but yes - it is huge even relative to linux.
>>
>>
>> Ah, any insight as to why?
>
> my custom compiled kernel:
>
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8791402 6 kwi 22
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Achim Hut wrote:
> Am 02.04.2013 12:13, schrieb Kimmo Paasiala:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
>> Wojciech Puchar writes:
>> > Lev Serebryakov writes:
>> > > It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some
>> > > firmwares are 64-bit CPU.
>> > don't kn
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 1 April 2013 17:13, wrote:
>>> Try "DESTDIR='/usr/TZ\ ONE'; export DESTDIR".
>>>
>>> You need to escape the space.
>>
>> This is '#!/bin/sh' scripting.
>> Doing so "fixes" *.mk, but breaks sh => dir simply doesn't exist anymore.
>>
>> Matthi
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 1 April 2013 at 0:48:08 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am writing this email to discuss the i386 architecture in FreeBSD.
>>
>> Computers are getting faster, but also more memory intensive. I
>> can not find a lap
I think the only ones who are going to object are the users of embedded
hardware. Some of them are still using CPUs that are only i586 equivalent.
Personally I support the notion.
-Kimmo
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing this email to discuss the i386 a
If it's just for ssh(1) and scp(1) you can use ssh_config(5) to force the
use of IPv4 based on the destination hostname.
-Kimmo
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-li...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> Mario Lobo writes:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:20:17 -0400
> > Aryeh Fried
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Would like to ask for opinions on this topic...
> Please read this PR for context:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/122838
> Especially Jaakko's insightful description of the problem.
>
>
> Original Message ---
19 matches
Mail list logo
