Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects

Mac OS X uses the FreeBSD's behaviour. I don't see any problem with the current implementation of "rm -P". I think I agree with Mike Meyers (omg!) My 0.01 cents -- JFRH ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'

On 7/31/06, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Juan Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On 7/31/06, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My GNU version of "cp" has more than 18 options, the FreeBSD > version only has

Re: [PATCH] adding two new options to 'cp'

On 7/31/06, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On 07/31/06 09:11, Mike Meyer wrote: > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Anderson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > >> The patch doesn't change any current behavior, nor should it be not