On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:08:08PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > BTW, what I'm suggesting here is the equivilent of the "no_fake_prompts"
> > setting in pam_opie.so found in -CURRENT. Basically, if the flag is set,
>
> Again, by all means, generate some diffs and we'll look 'em over. I'm
>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> After gainning some knowledge of UI coding when doing thefish, I've
> thought of making a graphical tool for vinum. I've just installed
> 5.0-DP1 on my main box and took the opportunity to use vinum for the
> first t
We have an openssh maintainer?
Right now, policy differs between branches. releng_4's openssh gives
a commented alternative in the config, whilst head's gives a commented
default.
A consistent change to -stable would be:
Index: servconf.c
===
In a remote kgdb, I have struct proc * for several processes that
are sleeping and I want the kernel backtraces for them. To illustrate:
(kgdb) set var $p201 = allproc.lh_first->p_list.le_next->p_list.le_next
(kgdb) print $p201->p_pid
$12 = 201
(kgdb) print $p201->p_xxthread.td_wmesg
$13 = 0xc024
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Farooq Mela wrote:
> "Andrew L. Neporada" wrote:
> > to Algorithms" book (AKA CLR) by MIT Press, more precisely "Knuth, Morris
> > and Pratt algorithm".
>
> Hmm, sounds good, much better than naive string matching algorithm.
Unless strstr gains an efficient (and elegant) wa
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Deepak Jain wrote:
> The new P4s are shipping with 800mhz RAMBUS memory modules. Wouldn't 2GB of
> 800mhz RAM go a long way to evening out the performance between a PC/FreeBSD
> box and all but the most specialized, packet-pushing ASICs?
>
> I was doing some rough figuring, a
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> As to what type of flood that is - you can't tell with that version of
> freebsd. It could've been a UDP or TCP flood (ACK or SYN). It actually
> couldn't have been a icmp flood, that version of freebsd didn't limit icmp
> responses. (Even though t
As previously discussed. This is the conservative route, of course. I did
not want to get into creating new VOP_SETATTR interfaces.
PR kern/29355
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29355
J
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body o
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> In fact, "man chflags", and look at the "-L" argument... I
> could make a good argument that it should operate on the
> link itself, if given a "-l" (currently unused) argument.
That was my expected result until I read the manpage completely and
follo
Is there a particular reason why there's no capability for setting flags
on symlinks? the chflags syscall uses namei with FOLLOW, and changing this
to NOFOLLOW allows chflags(2) to Do What I Want (i.e. SF_IMMUTABLE on a
VLNK)
is there a filesystem train crash awaiting me for doing this, or am I
I came up with a very similar solution independently (although I chose a
"reserved" partition number). You may also wish to (I did) patch boot0 for
the cosmetic fix. It is possible to rescue a 165'd [ATX] series thinkpad
by booting an install floppy without an installed HD and hot-inserting the
H
I think, generically, you want to look at
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html
in particular 22.4
--
Joshua Goodall
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I can't get there. Latency & packetloss too high from my cable modem in
NL.
Amusingly the route goes through the US :)
- J
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 12:47:16PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I guess the thing to do is to make sure they have the same d
13 matches
Mail list logo
