[...]
>> AIO is good when you are not receiving much data (or not receiving
>> it very frequently), and presumably want very low latency.
>
> What if you want good performance with "moderate" disk IO, say ten
> to twenty megabytes per second continuously?
I don't know if select/kqueue/poll "work"
On Friday, June 22, 2001, at 07:01 PM, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> Quick question, hopefully not too basic for this list:
>
> AIO vs. non-blocking IO vs. kernel queues
>
> I'm familiar with (and *love*) kernel queues. Non-blocking IO is
> straightforward. AIO seems simple enough.
>
> My question is, f
On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 02:37 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:23:21PM -0400, Rajappa Iyer wrote:
>> http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm
>>
>> Any obvious reasons why FreeBSD performed so poorly for these people?
>
> Yes, it's not very dif
3 matches
Mail list logo
