John Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Not in C.
>
> Actually you can (see below).
No you can't. This is from C99:
6.7.5.2 Array declarators
Constraints
In addition to optional type qualifiers and the keyword static, the [
and ] may delimit an expression or *. If they delimit an expr
Shankar Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone pls tell me if it is possible to define an array of size
> 0.
No, but you can with gcc.
/Johan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Zhihui Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The RX part seems to deal with RPC. I do not see the reason why it
> can improve performance.
Eh, what do you think is moving the bits to and from your fileserver?
For cached (non-network) accesses, arla is just slighly slower than
FFS.
/Johan
To Un
Zhihui Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the daemon can somehow reside entirely inside the kernel, like
> NFS daemon, we can save those crossings.
Yes, but the whole point of having the daemon in userspace is that
it's *so* much easier to maintain. If you want to work on performance,
I sugg
4 matches
Mail list logo
