The fsmware page is significantly dated, and I just am
not sure what's going on.
I was just curious if there was a better or updated status
available.
Thanks for your time.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
Running 6.0-stable as of 8/17. Bought a USB/Serial converter for my
notebook from radio shack. Works under windows, but comes
on as a "ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller. rev 1.10/3.00,
addr".
Is there a simple way for me to make this recognizable as a serial
interface (pr
I guess I just expected it to print all character device entries for the
file descriptors open by my process.
Kind of like the old /dev/fd/1 /dev/fd/2 directories used to be under MAKEDEV...
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:18:48PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 28), Jaye Mathi
I will confess, I have on idea if this is what's supposed to be happening.
The OpenBSD spam filter system need access to /dev/fd/7. Man page says that
I need to mount the fdescfs to get access.
Fine.
I'm running 6.1-STABLE.
So here's what I see, and it looks very odd:
devfs is mounted, fde
Quotas don't seem to be working. Or whatever I did in 5.x that worked
fine has subtly changed in such a way that I can't see the documentation
differences.
>From single user mode, mount -o userquota -t ufs /dev/ad0s1e /usr mounts fine
>without
any messages, but mount doesn't show it having quot
5.4-STABLE from 5/27, repeated panics. Finally got a crashdump, fired up kgdb
and:
(is there any advantage to booting the kernel.debug instead of the regular
kernel? Can't think
of one, but possibley...).
The box does run several jails. It has been crashing regularly under both
5.3-RELEASE
I've kind of switched to using vmware to host my FreeBSD OS, and usually
do everything from the command line. But now I guess I'd like X.
There's some old stuff on the vmware site for drivers for older versions
of FreeBSD, but I'd like to use 5.3 and x.org...
Thanks in advance.
___
06AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> >
> >
> > Does anybody know of a source of *dual* 48v capable
> > power supplies for ATX/i386 cases?
> >
> > We use FreeBSD extensively for our operation, and ev
Does anybody know of a source of *dual* 48v capable
power supplies for ATX/i386 cases?
We use FreeBSD extensively for our operation, and everything
is great, except I have this awesome 48v battery backed plant,
but no good way to use it.
I have lots of single source 48v DC supplies, and that's
We seem to have an issue where traffic going over an IPSEC
tunnel is getting tunneled, before it hits our NAT process...
For example.
Node A, running NAT on its "external" interface" sis0 which has an IP of 10.177.1.1
has an interface sis1 which is its "internal" interface with an I
I be stumped:
newsfeed-inn# uname -a
FreeBSD newsfeed-inn.meganews.com 4.4-STABLE FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 29
15:08:57 PST 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_4-2001-10-29/src/sys/compile/NEWSFEED-INN
i386
Diskcontroller is a 3ware 7800, with 4 maxtor 20GB IDE's on it, whic
2 500+GB FS's, both filled completely.
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/twed3d 524698116 524697730 386 100%/d/d0
/dev/twed4d 524698116 524502226 195890 100%/d/d1
newsfeed-inn# rm -f /d/d?/*
new
A search of the Freebsd hackers mailing list has a mail message
from Mike Smith saying that the 3DM utility was available
from 3ware, and to go to their site to get it.
Their PDF file for 3ware lists FreeBSD as supported. however,
when you go to the download section, only Linux and Windows.
D
I kldload md.ko. First md device comes up just peachy.
however, attempts to now create an md1 fail with device not
configured.
It is not obvious to me what flag needs to be passed
or how I can get 3 or more MD disks when using the module.
Is the only way to compile it into the kernel with
pse
FreeBSD newsfeed-inn2.meganews.com 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #2: Fri Jan 5
09:42:37 PST 2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_4-2000-12-18/src/sys/compile/NEWSFEED-INN3
i386
I have a 930GB vinum volume
newfs -v -i 4194304 /dev/vinum/v-spool
went fine.
However, I can't fsck it
Fore systems web site dumps you into Marconi's site, and a search there
doesn't find the word ATM.
Efficient Networks page doesnt list the card on the products page any
more.
So barring those 2, which are the only 2 listed in the release notes,
where can I get ATM cards that will work? Optima
Used ABBR on SCSI disks all the time, very nice.
Remember reading on hackers somewhere that newer drives like IBM supported
this feature. I'm getting a few bad blocks on a 75GB IBM drive (at least
according to the ata driver), and rather than replacing it and moves on,
the disk basically dies.
One of the comments on the side is:
"Caching file system with Soft Update technology".
Sounds vaguely BSD'ish. Maybe even FreeBSD'ish.
Just curious.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
talled,
then update the kernel.
I guess I"ll try that route, but I'd rather not.
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, [ISO-8859-1] GĂ©rard Roudier wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> > Compaq Proliant 5500, with the on-board NCR SCSI:
> >
> >
Compaq Proliant 5500, with the on-board NCR SCSI:
I get:
pci0: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0xa0f0)
sym0: <875> port blahblah
sym0: no NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity-checking
And the same for sym1.
What's the magic incantation to make this work? Or do I need to use an
adaptect to get installed,
I get it on my newsserver pretty much every night when expire runs.
12 IDE drives on 3 Promise controllers.
I was just actually about to replace the MB, thinking it was just
something freaky or unstable.
I will try the patch.
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I'm looking for t
Just noticed this little oddity while building XFree86-4, from ports
supped today:
make -k -f xmakefile all
root 17383 0.0 0.2 628 244 p6 I+6:30AM 0:00.00 (sh)
root 36617 0.0 0.5 1076 680 p6 I+6:51AM 0:00.05 make -k -k
CDEBUGFLAGS= all
root 36618 0.0 0.2 628
ts to ask to see if somebody else has hacked it in, even
if the command name isn't exactly descriptive...
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:02:03PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> >
> > Just exactly what I said in the Subject. I want to filte
wrote:
> What else do you want to filter by? did you read man ipfw? it should tell you all
>about it. you can filter by uid, type of
> packets, source, origin, etc..
>
> -Simon
>
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:03:58 -0700 (PDT), Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> >
> >
>
I would love to be able to filter ipfw traffic based on more than just
IP.
Anybody done anything like this?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
newsfeed-inn2# Jul 17 10:14:07 newsfeed-inn2
/kernel: pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing
PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
Don't see this one in LINT.
Anybody have any wild guesses as to good values?
newsfeed-inn2# sysctl -a | grep shm
kern.ipc.shmmax: 4194304
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ip
Well, I ran it by Soren, he didn't think so. And Originally when I
noticed it, I thought it was vinum (although I'm not using vinum in this
case), and mentioned it to greg, and he was leaning that way as well...
I'm not sure I buy the controller argument anyway.
For each pair of drives on each
Noticing something a tad odd here, under 4.0-stable, as of 6/27.
8 identical drives, (all IDE, all connected to identical IDE PCI
controllers).
8 parallel DD's started at the same type creating 2GB cycbuffs (as fast as
& can put them in the background). (dd if=/dev/zero bs=1m count=2000
of=bl
Not sure what the right thing to do here is, or even if it's a real
problem, but:
I have 8 75GB IBM drives striped in a big raid 0 for monkeying with.
newfs -i 131072 -v /dev/vinum/bighonkindisk seems to very nicely put all
the data that newfs write out on to the first disk... It least, only
I was just curious what people's thoughts were on the potential "total
system throughput" (whatever you choose it to be), wrt using software
RAID.
It would seem that software RAID would just kill big chunks of cache,
especially CPU cache, moving lots of data throught it to calcuate CRC's.
per
I have many of them up and running under 4.0, but they will only function
as normal IDE controllers, not "RAID".
As to teh BIOS issue, make a stripe, then make your partition that you're
using not stomp on the end of the drive, and it won't overwrite that gook
that the promise sticks out there.
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> This can be done with any dual channel ATA controller, so I guess
> its just a matter of time until we see this in the motherboard
> BIOS on some boards
Promise already sells a MB with this BIOS on it. Never got one, but saw
it on the web p
It was mounted soft-updates:
/dev/vinum/vinum0 on /d/vol0 (ufs, local, soft-updates, writes: sync 69895
async 508210, reads: sync 297497 async 389496)
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> Mount the filesystem(s) async, or use softupdates.
>
> >
> > I wish I would've grabbed a screen
I wish I would've grabbed a screen shot while it was happening, but I
didn't.
In any case, a fairly recent 4.0-stable (last couple weeks), and samba
2.0.7.
The FreeBSD box is doing nothing, except smb, and running systat -vmstat 1
in a telnet session.
>From my NT box, I was moving a bunch of
2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 1 June 2000 at 23:56:44 -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
> >
> > I have 2 maxtor 40GB's running off a Promise FastTrak 66 under 4.0-stable,
> > and it's working fine, except for one teensy problem.
> >
> > vinum (striping
I have 2 maxtor 40GB's running off a Promise FastTrak 66 under 4.0-stable,
and it's working fine, except for one teensy problem.
vinum (striping them), apparently overwrote whatever the promise uses to
track them as part of a stripe set... So on reboot, I have to hit an F2
configure, because th
UDP v2 mounts, Netapp Filer.
Getting a fair # of:
got bad cookie vp 0xd24bf1c0 bp 0xc9090500
got bad cookie vp 0xd24bfda0 bp 0xc906ceb0
on the console, and it seems to lock the machine up for several minutes
when it does. Then it comes back to life, and cranks for a while...
Not sure where
Same here, I'm running 4 disks RAID-0'd under 4.0-current for Diablo, and
it's running fine.
Haven't updated anythign to RAID-5 support yet.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 09:32:34PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems Chad David wrote:
> > > I just p
I have several of the etinc cards. If you can live with Dennis's rather
curt manner, they're perfectly fine cards.
I'm going to get one of the LMC boards though, integrated CSU/DSU would be
nice, and possibly save a few bucks.
ET has a bandwidth manager that works very nicely, and is a heck of
Running a relatively recent 3.4-STABLE:
If you use the -V option to specify an alternate master.passwd/conf file
location, then the -m option apparently doesn't work.
I get users added to my alt pw file, but no home dir creation.
Removing the -V /altdir option adds them to /etc/master.pa
Intel used to have a 4 port 100mbit card in the PRO line. I have lots of
the duals and they work fine with FreeBSD, but need the 4 porter for a 1U
case...
Anybody know of a supplier or can sell me one?
It would be much appreciated...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
I would like to play around with some y2k testing.
While setting dates and such works, I'd really like to
be able to disable xntpd, and have time move faster. So
I could set the date to 12/28/99 or somesuch, and
have time run at 4:1 or 10:1, or something that lets
me run through a few days of
What's the danger in changing the NPROC define in param.c to be ifdef'd,
and an option in the kernel config file?
it looks like the only way to change the # of allowed processes is via
changing maxusers, but is that only by convention?Or is there
some other reason I can't override it?
Hmph. Fired up systat on a recently supped 3.2-stable box (aug 30).
Typed :vm, and the screen cleared, it drew the labels, then sat there for
a few seconds, then said:
"The alternate system clock has died, reverting to pigs display".
However, that display shows no useful info either. :nets
Hmph. Fired up systat on a recently supped 3.2-stable box (aug 30).
Typed :vm, and the screen cleared, it drew the labels, then sat there for
a few seconds, then said:
"The alternate system clock has died, reverting to pigs display".
However, that display shows no useful info either. :net
Why is it OK for top to do it, but not pwd_mkdb? I probably end up
updating my OS faster than I add users to my password file...
Tweak the cache to 32MB's, and never touch it again, regardless of how big
your passwd file is...
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > Got tired of th
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:29:58 MST, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> > Got tired of the dinky cachesize for pwd_mkdb, especially since vipw
> > doesn't take advantage of the -u or -s options.
>
> Vipw doesn't take advantage of the -u option? I must have read through
> the c
Why is it OK for top to do it, but not pwd_mkdb? I probably end up
updating my OS faster than I add users to my password file...
Tweak the cache to 32MB's, and never touch it again, regardless of how big
your passwd file is...
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > Got tired of t
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999 18:29:58 MST, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> > Got tired of the dinky cachesize for pwd_mkdb, especially since vipw
> > doesn't take advantage of the -u or -s options.
>
> Vipw doesn't take advantage of the -u option? I must have read through
> the c
Got tired of the dinky cachesize for pwd_mkdb, especially since vipw
doesn't take advantage of the -u or -s options.
So here a couple patches that make the cachesize tweakable from make.conf.
Dramatically helps on those 10-15k line password files.
I would appreciate it if somebody would at lea
Got tired of the dinky cachesize for pwd_mkdb, especially since vipw
doesn't take advantage of the -u or -s options.
So here a couple patches that make the cachesize tweakable from make.conf.
Dramatically helps on those 10-15k line password files.
I would appreciate it if somebody would at le
ay wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> > While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
> > would like to validate passwords via Radius...
> >
> > It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
>
> Thi
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> > While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
> > would like to validate passwords via Radius...
> >
> > It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
>
> Thi
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Steven Ames wrote:
> Thanks! I'll check the site (but would appreciate your sending it to me
> also).
>
> -Steve
>
> On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> >
> > There is a patch that fixes this, I found it, and submitted a bug report
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Steven Ames wrote:
> Thanks! I'll check the site (but would appreciate your sending it to me
> also).
>
> -Steve
>
> On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> >
> > There is a patch that fixes this, I found it, and submitted a bug re
There is a patch that fixes this, I found it, and submitted a bug report
on their web page.
I don't have it handy, but if you go to www.openldap.org and to their
faq-o-matic, and it should be in there.
I'll see if I can find it and send it to you in the mean time.
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Steven Am
There is a patch that fixes this, I found it, and submitted a bug report
on their web page.
I don't have it handy, but if you go to www.openldap.org and to their
faq-o-matic, and it should be in there.
I'll see if I can find it and send it to you in the mean time.
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Steven A
Maybe it could be made a sysctl knob...
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Jason Young wrote:
>
> It's been committed before, and broke many things (X and CVSup come to
> mind). I have it compiled in locally on a few machines but it's
> definitely not suitable for general distribution until a solution is
> f
Maybe it could be made a sysctl knob...
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Jason Young wrote:
>
> It's been committed before, and broke many things (X and CVSup come to
> mind). I have it compiled in locally on a few machines but it's
> definitely not suitable for general distribution until a solution is
>
Need to build a good fast single processor server running FreeBSD 3.2.
Uptime far more important than absolute maximum speed.
However, pricing dell/compaq, etc, seems on the high side.
What good boards are people using in the trenches?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
Need to build a good fast single processor server running FreeBSD 3.2.
Uptime far more important than absolute maximum speed.
However, pricing dell/compaq, etc, seems on the high side.
What good boards are people using in the trenches?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but since switches forward packets
> :selectively per port, I would think it would be hard to sniff packets on
> :any port, w/o administrative access to the switch to tell it to mirror
> :data to a different po
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but since switches forward packets
> :selectively per port, I would think it would be hard to sniff packets on
> :any port, w/o administrative access to the switch to tell it to mirror
> :data to a different p
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but since switches forward packets
selectively per port, I would think it would be hard to sniff packets on
any port, w/o administrative access to the switch to tell it to mirror
data to a different port.
ie, if I'm plugged into port 1, I can't see traffic
Perhaps I'm missing something obvious, but since switches forward packets
selectively per port, I would think it would be hard to sniff packets on
any port, w/o administrative access to the switch to tell it to mirror
data to a different port.
ie, if I'm plugged into port 1, I can't see traffic
I have a box running 3.1-stable that I wanted to update. sups fine, but
the build dies in login with:
===> usr.bin/login
cc -O -pipe -static -Wall -DLOGIN_ACCESS -DLOGALL
-I/usr/obj/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_3/src/tmp/usr/include -c /n/FreeBSD/RELENG_3
/src/usr.bin/login/login.c
/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_3/src
I have a box running 3.1-stable that I wanted to update. sups fine, but
the build dies in login with:
===> usr.bin/login
cc -O -pipe -static -Wall -DLOGIN_ACCESS -DLOGALL
-I/usr/obj/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_3/src/tmp/usr/include -c /n/FreeBSD/RELENG_3
/src/usr.bin/login/login.c
/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_3/sr
The man page says the tee option on ipfw is not yet supported.
I'm wondering if that is still the case as of 3.2-stable, or if the doc is
just out of date.
I would like to make a copy of incoming UDP packets to a specific port for
some testing. tee seems like an easy way to go.
To Unsubscri
The man page says the tee option on ipfw is not yet supported.
I'm wondering if that is still the case as of 3.2-stable, or if the doc is
just out of date.
I would like to make a copy of incoming UDP packets to a specific port for
some testing. tee seems like an easy way to go.
To Unsubscr
I've been running VM Ware under NT for a few days now, booting FreeBSD and
other OS's.
In some quick testing:
The host machine is NT 4.0, SP5, 384MB RAM, dual 450 PII's.
The guest OS is FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE, configured with the VMWARE 512MB
disk, and 32MB RAM allocated
Compiling a generic
I've been running VM Ware under NT for a few days now, booting FreeBSD and
other OS's.
In some quick testing:
The host machine is NT 4.0, SP5, 384MB RAM, dual 450 PII's.
The guest OS is FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE, configured with the VMWARE 512MB
disk, and 32MB RAM allocated
Compiling a generic
Look fairly robust:
http://vxatape.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Look fairly robust:
http://vxatape.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I just got a DOC2K in, and am anxious to play with it. I know Poul had
done some work with it, but his web page doesn't have a link to it, and I
cannot find his original email.
The reference in freebsd-small doesn't contain an URL...
Any help appreciated.
I want to run under 3.2-stable.
To
I just got a DOC2K in, and am anxious to play with it. I know Poul had
done some work with it, but his web page doesn't have a link to it, and I
cannot find his original email.
The reference in freebsd-small doesn't contain an URL...
Any help appreciated.
I want to run under 3.2-stable.
T
I see it's supported, but I'm curious if anybody is using it. If so, I'd
like to ask a few questions off-line of somebody...
Thanks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I second this. Even if it's a bit painful, somebody who has been working
diligently at this needs to be able to be make their work usable quickly.
I would guess that not too many things hinder progress, or quash desire
more than fixes to problems languishing.
There has to be some middle ground s
It is kind of interesting that now the shoe is on the other foot...
A few months ago I purchased some sync cards from ET, and had some (and am
still having) trouble getting them to work consistently.
When I emailed their support dept for help, I got a few curt non-helpful
replies, then a message
80 matches
Mail list logo