On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I'm trying to decide if I should cram "mfid" for mfi(4) controllers into
> the src tree or if we should package it up into a ports package. I
> suspect that either one is acceptible, but it seems to make more sense
> to put it into the src tre
er is not used for this
operation.
-jgh
--
Jason Helfman
System Administrator
experts-exchange.com
http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html
E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
-jgh
Thanks
Regards, Juki
Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry®
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Jason
cumentation bug that was put in regarding the ucom device, and
it was to update the device name in the documentation.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155074
I don't know if a PR is still required, but this may be worth a look first.
Carl
4 matches
Mail list logo