a structure on initialization, so as to
>avoid initializing again.
And where do I do that? Do you mean in the struct cdevsw?
Jan Engelhardt
--
ENOSPC
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
>> What should I use instead? A semaphore?
>You shouldn't have unrelated kernel threads waiting for a user
>process at all, so this sounds like a design problem, regardless
>of which mutual exclusion primitive you use. (Bear in mind that I
>haven't actually looked into what you're trying to do.)
.
>4) Why on earth do you use gmake? What's wrong with bsd.*.mk? It's a whole lot
>easier.
Because non-BSD (read: Linux, MINGW/MSYS and Cygwin) do not ship BSD make. And
of course, that I got to GNU make first and had few joy to learn another make
syntax.
Jan Engelhardt
o find the shortest
codepiece showing the problem.
Well, you can retrieve the short prog at http://linux01.org/~jengelh/BUG.tbz2
Both files (rpldev.c and rpld.c) seem perfectly fine, but ...
see rpld.c for the details of the crash.
Hope someone can shed some light on this.
Thanks,
Jan Engelhardt
4 matches
Mail list logo
