possible syslogd bug?

1999-08-05 Thread Jan B. Koum
I have a dedicated syslog machine runnign 3.2 and vanilla syslogd (started with -vv flags). After running for a few day the file would grow (this time file was ~40MB) and syslogd would stop writing to a file and go into a weird state. Here is the ktrace of "hang" syslogd before I did 'reboo

possible syslogd bug?

1999-08-05 Thread Jan B. Koum
I have a dedicated syslog machine runnign 3.2 and vanilla syslogd (started with -vv flags). After running for a few day the file would grow (this time file was ~40MB) and syslogd would stop writing to a file and go into a weird state. Here is the ktrace of "hang" syslogd before I did 'rebo

Re: Hey kernel hackers, this is worth a read.

1999-08-01 Thread Jan B. Koum
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:58:09PM -0700, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html > > A story on upcoming plans for the Linux 2.4 kernel. Since they're > going after a lot of the same performance goals we are, it's worth a > read. > > - Jordan > > > To U

Re: Hey kernel hackers, this is worth a read.

1999-08-01 Thread Jan B. Koum
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:58:09PM -0700, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://features.linuxtoday.com/stories/8191.html > > A story on upcoming plans for the Linux 2.4 kernel. Since they're > going after a lot of the same performance goals we are, it's worth a > read. > > -

Re: sandbox??

1999-07-25 Thread Jan B. Koum
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 11:36:49AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > A sandbox is a security term. It can mean two things: > [...] > > UNIX implements two core sanboxes. One is at the process level, and one > is at the userid level. > > Every UNIX process is completely firewalle

Re: sandbox??

1999-07-25 Thread Jan B. Koum
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 11:36:49AM -0700, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A sandbox is a security term. It can mean two things: > [...] > > UNIX implements two core sanboxes. One is at the process level, and one > is at the userid level. > > Every UNIX process is