On 05/25/12 10:48, Sean Bruno wrote:
I've been toying with the idea of letting jails renice processes ... how
dangerous and/or stupid is this idea?
//depot/yahoo/ybsd_9/src/sys/kern/kern_jail.c#5 -
/home/seanbru/ybsd_9/src/sys/kern/kern_jail.c
270a271,275
+ int jail_allow_renice = 0;
No - this is entirely a user-space project. Those are both things I'd
like to add to jails after I get through the mess on the ofhter side of
the kernel divide.
- Jamie
On 01/27/11 13:30, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Jamie Gritton wrote:
It's
That's where it's headed. I've been slow on progress lately, but I'm
working on a jail(8) that takes a config file instead of rc shell
variables, and takes care of dependency issues among other things.
- Jamie
On 01/27/11 08:42, Dirk Engling wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
hat fixed up, I plan on putting it in HEAD. After that, I still
have a todo list mostly of suggestions from others.
Feel free to give me any "todo" suggestions, or any other feedback :-).
- Jamie
On 01/27/11 10:18, Dirk Engling wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jamie Gritton wrote:
That&
On 07/15/10 04:12, Stanislav Uzunchev wrote:
I have found something very strange to me... It is a problem with static
allocating size of buffer where jail param is going to be coppied, using
jail_getv function from the libjails. Well for example:
buff[size];
jail_getv(0, "name", "1", "host.host
5 matches
Mail list logo
