Re: securelevel and ipfw zero

1999-07-28 Thread Henk van Oers
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Julian Elischer wrote: > a system wide limit and each rule's logging counter individually resetable > back to 0. > > So, what's your vote? > > ... Joe I vote for this too. Henk. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the

Re: securelevel and ipfw zero

1999-07-28 Thread Henk van Oers
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > > If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about: > > > per-rule logging limits > > > logging limit raising > > > logging limit resetting > > > Which would all NOT affect the statistics? Separate statistics/logging counters is fine, b

Re: securelevel and ipfw zero

1999-07-28 Thread Henk van Oers
On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Julian Elischer wrote: > a system wide limit and each rule's logging counter individually resetable > back to 0. > > So, what's your vote? > > ... Joe I vote for this too. Henk. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the bod

Re: securelevel and ipfw zero

1999-07-28 Thread Henk van Oers
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > > If it will get ALL of you to give it a rest, how about: > > > per-rule logging limits > > > logging limit raising > > > logging limit resetting > > > Which would all NOT affect the statistics? Separate statistics/logging counters is fine,