Re: make question

2011-04-29 Thread Hartmut Brandt
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote: RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote: RD>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote: RD>> RD>> RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote: RD>> RD>> Hi Roman, RD&g

Re: make question

2011-04-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote: RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote: RD>> Hi Roman, RD>> RD>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote: RD>> RD>> RD>You seem to have messed with bsd make so I have a question for you :)

Re: make question

2011-04-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Hi Roman, On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote: RD>You seem to have messed with bsd make so I have a question for you :) Yeah, that was some time ago ... RD>When a job is about to be executed in JobStart() a pipe is created with RD>its ends connected to job->inPipe/job->outPipe. When the j

Re: change to make - error when Makefile doesn't exist

2008-11-30 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Eitan Adler wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I stupidly forgot to make a backup so I can't provide a diff but in src/usr.bin I changed TryReadMakefile("Makefile"); to if (!TryReadMakefile("Makefile")) Fatal("Makefile could not be opened");

Re: Kerberized CIFS client?

2008-05-22 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Derek Taylor wrote: This question was previously posed of the freebsd-questions list, but with no response for a week, I'd like to try my luck here. If there's any more information I should include, please speak up: I would be glad to oblige. I would like to use smb/cifs with kerberos auth, but

Re: Documentation on writing a custom socket

2008-03-09 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Julian Elischer wrote: Hartmut Brandt wrote: Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: I'm planning to create a new socket type in FreeBSD called AF_Q921, which is to be used for ISDN telephony. Where do I find documentation on how to implement a new socket i

Re: Documentation on writing a custom socket

2008-03-08 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: I'm planning to create a new socket type in FreeBSD called AF_Q921, which is to be used for ISDN telephony. Where do I find documentation on how to implement a new socket in the kernel ? [SNIP] that isn't connected to th

Re: kern.ngroups question

2007-07-19 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Reuben A. Popp wrote: On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:19, Michael Vince wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: Reuben A. Popp wrote: Hello all, Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set to 16 by default? NFS only supports this much by default (from memory). Samba (in the gui

Re: kern.ngroups question

2007-06-06 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Reuben A. Popp wrote: Hello all, Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set to 16 by default? I came across this issue originally when working on our Samba implementation (samba-3 out of ports, running on 6-STABLE). We have some users that belong to a number of g

Re: Looking for speed increases in "make index" and pkg_version for ports

2007-05-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Mike Meyer wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: Mike Meyer wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: 1. make and its sub-makes for a) reading the file; b) parsing the file (note that .if and .for

Re: Looking for speed increases in "make index" and pkg_version for ports

2007-05-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Mike Meyer wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: 1. make and its sub-makes for a) reading the file; b) parsing the file (note that .if and .for processing is done while parsing); c) processing targets. Make and submakes have been gone over alrea

Re: Looking for speed increases in "make index" and pkg_version for ports

2007-05-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Hartmut Brandt wrote: Having done a great deal of rewriting of make some two years ago I can tell you that even a small change to make is a tough job testing-wise: run all the combinations of !-j and -j on all architectures and run the change through the port

Re: Looking for speed increases in "make index" and pkg_version for ports

2007-05-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed package. Now "make -V PKGNAME" should be a speedy operation, but th

Re: Looking for speed increases in "make index" and pkg_version for ports

2007-05-28 Thread Hartmut Brandt
Matthew Seaman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every install