On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
RD>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
RD>>
RD>> RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
RD>> RD>> Hi Roman,
RD&g
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
RD>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
RD>> Hi Roman,
RD>>
RD>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
RD>>
RD>> RD>You seem to have messed with bsd make so I have a question for you :)
Hi Roman,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Roman Divacky wrote:
RD>You seem to have messed with bsd make so I have a question for you :)
Yeah, that was some time ago ...
RD>When a job is about to be executed in JobStart() a pipe is created with
RD>its ends connected to job->inPipe/job->outPipe. When the j
Eitan Adler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I stupidly forgot to make a backup so I can't provide a diff but in
src/usr.bin
I changed
TryReadMakefile("Makefile");
to
if (!TryReadMakefile("Makefile"))
Fatal("Makefile could not be opened");
Derek Taylor wrote:
This question was previously posed of the freebsd-questions list, but
with no response for a week, I'd like to try my luck here. If there's
any more information I should include, please speak up: I would be glad
to oblige.
I would like to use smb/cifs with kerberos auth, but
Julian Elischer wrote:
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I'm planning to create a new socket type in FreeBSD called AF_Q921,
which is to be used for ISDN telephony. Where do I find
documentation on how to implement a new socket i
Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I'm planning to create a new socket type in FreeBSD called AF_Q921,
which is to be used for ISDN telephony. Where do I find documentation
on how to implement a new socket in the kernel ?
[SNIP]
that isn't connected to th
Reuben A. Popp wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:19, Michael Vince wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Reuben A. Popp wrote:
Hello all,
Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set
to 16 by default?
NFS only supports this much by default (from memory).
Samba (in the gui
Reuben A. Popp wrote:
Hello all,
Can someone explain to me the rationale behind having ngroups_max set to 16 by
default?
I came across this issue originally when working on our Samba implementation
(samba-3 out of ports, running on 6-STABLE). We have some users that belong
to a number of g
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
1. make and its sub-makes for a) reading the file; b) parsing the file
(note that .if and .for
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hartmut Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
1. make and its sub-makes for a) reading the file; b) parsing the file
(note that .if and .for processing is done while parsing); c) processing
targets.
Make and submakes have been gone over alrea
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
Having done a great deal of rewriting of make some two years ago I can
tell you that even a small change to make is a tough job testing-wise:
run all the combinations of !-j and -j on all architectures and run
the change through the port
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed package. Now
"make -V PKGNAME" should be a speedy operation, but th
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every install
14 matches
Mail list logo