On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 09:39:15PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:20:58PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> >
> > :
> > :On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:33:50AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> > :>
> > :> :
> > :> :Thanks, I will try setting errno, but I don't think it is signals.
> >
clients, yet it
does not see any problems.
But thanks for the insight. I will place a sniffer of the port
and see if there are excessive retransmits
Graham.
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Graham Barr writes:
>
> >Also wh
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:09:17PM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010607 12:17] wrote:
>
> Since people seem to be helping you in other ways, I'll just
> answer this one:
>
> > So, here is my question. Does anyone know under
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:33:50AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> :
> :Thanks, I will try setting errno, but I don't think it is signals.
> :I have been running truss on the process. The relevant part is
> :
> :gettimeofday(0xbfbffa54,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
> :select(0x50,0x93f8c90,0x0
Thanks, I will try setting errno, but I don't think it is signals.
I have been running truss on the process. The relevant part is
gettimeofday(0xbfbffa54,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
select(0x50,0x93f8c90,0x0,0x0,0xbfbffa74)= 3 (0x3)
read(0x16,0xa2da000,0x8000)
A while ago our systems were upgraded from 4.2 to 4.3-RC, and at
this time we started seeing problems that I am having a difficult
time tracking down.
We have a server process which is connected to by many other
machines, each of them streams data in via tcp/ip. These connections
are pretty much
6 matches
Mail list logo
