atacontrol would be similar to:
atacontrol detach 3
atacontrol attach 3
atacontrol addspare ar0 ad6
atacontrol rebuild ar0
Good luck,
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
http://www.tirloni.org
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
that event happens. But you want to monitor you
whole partition.. perhaps intercept some syscalls ?
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
http://blog.tirloni.org
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
got me by
surprise with the feeling that I completely forgot about password
differences between Linux and FreeBSD at the time. I'm glad everything
worked!
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
"for() connect()" on the client.
What I'm trying to simulate is the behavior of a IRC server that has
thousands of persistent connections, but with threads.
Original Message
Subject: pthread_create: cannot allocate memory
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:29:33 -0300
Fro
, do the first few steps of:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/
That worked, thank you and everybody that took the time to read this thread.
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
correct but doesn't help. I thought about hacking ataraid somehow
so it does the opossite but it seems ugly.
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0xD0315C26
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
Aaron Glenn disse:
> On 7/11/05, Giovanni P. Tirloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But I'd like to ask if it'd theoretically be possible to create the
>> RAID1
>> array (ar0) with only one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
>> like
ly one disk and add the second one later? It'd work
like a broken array for some time. It's just an idea :)
Thanks,
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(in use/in pool)
Thanks in advance,
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
Fingerprint: 8C3F BEC5 79BD 3E9B EDB8 72F4 16E8 BA5E D031 5C26
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Although I remember someone here got it working but I
can't remember his name.
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
Fingerprint: 8C3F BEC5 79BD 3E9B EDB8 72F4 16E8 BA5E D031 5C26
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[ I couldn't find this thread on the archives so I'm jumping in blind. ]
Perhaps you're being livelocked by so many interrupts hitting the
system that it doesn't do anything productive and only stays there
handling interrupts.
Can you try polling (http://info.iet.unipi.it/~
equeing to the interrupt thread adds
> back in the same type of transition boundary you were trying to take
> out by getting rid of NETISR in the first place.
Thank you very much for answering my question. Things are much clear
now!
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
Fingerprint: 8C3F BEC5 79BD 3E9B EDB8 72F4 16E8 BA5E D031 5C26
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
r and it looks
like their network channel (ni) but I'm not sure. I also read about it
in 5.2 TODO list about fine-grained locking.
Where can I find more information on this?
Thanks
--
Giovanni P. Tirloni
Fingerprint: 8C3F BEC5 79BD 3E9B EDB8
gt; 4) m_flags = M_EXT|M_PKTHDR
>
> and yes when using clusters, the memory in the mbuf is unsed.
>
> hop that helped.
Thank you very much Justin and Jerry for the answers. They were very
helpful.
I'm already getting my copy of Steven's :-)
--
Giovanni P. Ti
hanging MSIZE affects the whole thing?
4. What about MCLBYTES?
Sorry to make so many questions at once but I find it very interesting
and I'm really willing to learn how the building blocks of the network
stack work. Perhaps my questions are out of reality.. it's risk.
Thanks
er
> >windows, too.
> >
> >Is this a good project for me to do, or has someone done this already?
> >
> >JAn
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
>
one.
The general idea is to give the machine's admin enough power so he/she
can change it to his/her needs. Can anyone comment my idea ?
Thanks in advance,
Giovanni P. Tirloni
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacke
fax commands to your modem at the
> same time as you're trying to dial
Giovanni P. Tirloni
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fone: +55 44 225 6267
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
0.0.0.0
add default HISADDR
# EOF
My modem is a internal USRobotics 56k (x2/v90) and as additional
information this doesn't happen in Linux (2.2.17).
If this isn't the correct mailing list forgive me please (perhaps
-stable would be the one, but anyway).
Thanks in adva
t; Qian Feng
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
Giovanni P. Tirloni
20 matches
Mail list logo