soaccept not returning host info?

2002-08-15 Thread Erik Greenwald
Hi I'm writing a kernel module (for -current) that provides a listening inet socket, I have it establishing and binding the socket, tsleeping for the event, etc, and the soaccept() call seems to work fine. My problem is that the info about the connecting host info seems incomplete. It reports a l

Re: About 5.0 and Nvidia drivers

2002-08-03 Thread Erik Greenwald
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 05:28:07PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > Sorry, this has been the status for months now. > ugh, sounds like the lip-service I was getting. "I'll look into that" :/ I'm starting to ponder the legality and challenge involved in reverse engineering the card and build

kernel hacking environment

2002-08-03 Thread Erik Greenwald
Hey, I have a quick question What are some cool kernel hacking environments? I've been dropping down to single user mode and mounting my /usr ro to avoid fsck time, and have been thinking of using bochs or vmware to try to expediate things, maybe with a 100 meg 'disk', then put most of the files

Re: unbelievable benchmark output

2002-02-03 Thread Erik Greenwald
> > Several runs of the program take about the same time but the time > changes wildly when the executable is called differently. > > --- > ./xx/xxx > 5 s > xx/xxx > 9 s > > The only thing which I can think of that can be causing this is some > memory alignment issue. > it could also b

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-31 Thread Erik Greenwald
> > > > > > > > Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133 > > > chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such > > > motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the > > > difference?). For more info, check out: > > Well, I

Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors

2001-08-30 Thread Erik Greenwald
> Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133 > chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such > motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the > difference?). For more info, check out: I'm using both of those (iwill kk266)

sysconf() vs sysctl()

2001-08-27 Thread Erik Greenwald
Hi Are there any plans to implement'_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF' in sysconf() ? I'm aware of hw.ncpu and the sysctl() call with {CTL_HW,HW_NCPU}, but sysconf is posix and sysctl is not :) (is it already done in 5.0? I'm using 4.4) thnx -Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik] Th