Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-12 Thread Eric Anholt
perhaps best option. The alternate route is to just port the i810 driver as-is. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin

Re: support for __thread

2003-12-21 Thread Eric Anholt
s/gcc/Thread-Local.html > > > > > > it seems the assembler chokes on it? > > We don't have support for it yet. Why do you want it? >From what I understand, having thread-local variables would be a big bonus for OpenGL. -- Eric Anholt

Re: Matrox Parhelia XFree86 Busmastering kernel module?

2003-10-11 Thread Eric Anholt
errupts to efficiently use the card's DMA support and sharing of resources between various competing direct-rendering clients. I'm not aware of anyone working on Matrox binary driver support. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http:

Re: per-open device private data, mmap

2003-03-14 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 13:59, Eric Anholt wrote: > To work properly, the DRM needs an area of memory per open of the device > which stores information on whether that fd is authenticated and also to > have a unique identifier for use in the lock. Currently we use > drm_find_file_by_pro

per-open device private data, mmap

2003-03-14 Thread Eric Anholt
from the device's mmap handler I can detect whether mmap() or mapbufs made the mapping, or to have different mmap handlers for those two vm_mmap callers. What's the best way to do this? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org

Re: busdma in the DRM

2002-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:36, Nate Lawson wrote: > On 6 Nov 2002, Eric Anholt wrote: > > I've been trying to figure out how to use the bus_dma* functions in the > > DRM. What I'm working on at the moment is the ATI PCIGART. How it > > works right now is an ioctl i

busdma in the DRM

2002-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
p's vaddr and PAGE_SIZE long. Am I totally off base here? Is this even possible? -- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: X11 display problem

2002-10-25 Thread Eric Anholt
xdm > users (myself included). WITH_TCP_(LISTEN_)DEFAULT? It's not exactly a compile-time option like most WITH_BLAH. However, this plus a message at the start of the build and maybe a pkg-message note makes me much more comfortable with the startx/xdm changes. I may get to it this weekend

Re: KLD mmap question

2002-05-30 Thread Eric Anholt
nk I figured out that you didn't need memory that was going to be mmapped to be physically contiguous (since the device pager would get each page of it separately). Was I right? -- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mai

Re: DRI, XFree86-4.0.3 and -current.

2001-09-07 Thread Eric Anholt
to a faster line (2 weeks) before downloading the X release to test against. On Friday 07 September 2001 03:12, Volker Stolz wrote: > In local.freebsd-hackers, you wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:16:19PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > >> I have a page about the DRI for FreeBSD at=20

Re: DRI, XFree86-4.0.3 and -current.

2001-09-06 Thread Eric Anholt
t yet (I'm still setting up my new -current installation). On Thursday 06 September 2001 10:57, Josef Karthauser wrote: > Has anyone got patches for DRI under -current? > > Joe -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe fr