newbie question: filesystem i/o

2001-10-02 Thread Egervary Gergely
hi hackers, I'm quite new to FreeBSD but not in UN*X, please let me ask a question: I wonder that the filesystem performance under FreeBSD is so great. I'm doing disk-to-disk file copies, like ``dd if=file1 of=file2 bs=64k'' and the performance is much better than on other unices. Other systems

Re: xfree 4.0 xvidtune

2000-04-09 Thread Egervary Gergely
> Last weekend I dl'ed the Xfree4.0 distribution (for FreeBSD) from > Xfree86.org. > xvidtune gpf's on my machine (but seems to work when xf86Setup > calls it) works great for me -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the

Re: How a normal user can crash any linux system (fwd)

2000-03-23 Thread Egervary Gergely
> I don't see anything about session accouning in the pam_limits section > of the html docs distributed with Redhat (this doesn't mean they're not > present though ;-) What exactly does it do? for example, this is very important on a ppp dial-up server: $ grep maxlogins /etc/security/limits.conf

Re: How a normal user can crash any linux system (fwd)

2000-03-23 Thread Egervary Gergely
> > has anyone ported it to BSD? > > /etc/login.conf can set limits for you, in a possibly more flexable way. but login does not support session accounting that pam_limits.so does. (it should support, but it's not implemented) -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "un

Re: How a normal user can crash any linux system (fwd)

2000-03-23 Thread Egervary Gergely
> /etc/security/limits.conf mmm... this is for pam_limits.so in linux has anyone ported it to BSD? -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: MAXUSERS question, what is max MAXUSERS setting?

2000-03-02 Thread Egervary Gergely
> i just wondered what the maximum MAXUSERS setting for a 3.4 kernel would > be on a smp system with 512mb ram... the impact on the system structures > seems to be very... errrhh... rather complex. > > any ideas? it gives me a warning if i got past 512, but what will happen > then? see conf/para

Re: SBLive... anyone, anywhere?

2000-02-17 Thread Egervary Gergely
> There was some mention in the SBLive earlier this year (January), whatever > became of it? I checked www.posi.net and I do not see the driver listed > there at all. Pointers/suggestions? it's listed there. the guy does not reply the mails, however -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM

Re: accounting, ppp

2000-02-14 Thread Egervary Gergely
> Did you see, `man 1 last` ? > Here is a sample output list of last. > tf051005.tf.or.jp is my ppp dial-up client. > dhcp100.tf.or.jp is my dhcp client. of course accounting means more than just getting information ;)) eg. limiting, etc ;) -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: accounting, ppp

2000-02-14 Thread Egervary Gergely
> > :accounted:\ > > :sessionlimit=1: > > and login still let me log in more than once. > > both login and pam_unix.so do not have accounting capabilities ok, well - I've seen the sources. anyway, what has accounting capabilities, and what are the plans about it? -- mauzi To Unsubscr

Re: accounting, ppp

2000-02-14 Thread Egervary Gergely
> > I'm running a PPP dialup server. (mgetty-autoppp) Is there any way to do > > login accounting (like solaris' PAM modules, or linux pam_limits.so) > > A FreeBSD PAM module? ;) > > We use the same PAM code as linux, so grab the source of the module you > use under linux and compile it on FreeB

accounting, ppp

2000-02-12 Thread Egervary Gergely
hello, [moving from -questions, as no answers received] I'm running a PPP dialup server. (mgetty-autoppp) Is there any way to do login accounting (like solaris' PAM modules, or linux pam_limits.so) Basically, I have to limit simultaneous connections, and monthly login times. -- mauzi To Uns

Re: NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-02 Thread Egervary Gergely
> Interface type/speed is less important than number of open sockets. > I've got an NFS server with a 100mbit card in it that is pretty heavily > used the whole day, and after 22 days of uptime, netstat -m shows: > > 72/596/2112 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) > > That's just using what

NMBCLUSTERS

2000-02-02 Thread Egervary Gergely
hello, what size of $SUBJECT should be used on a box with two _extremely_ busy 100baseTX interfaces? -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Multi Head XFree86 VGA card recomendations wanted

1999-12-16 Thread Egervary Gergely
> XFree86 was written to support one monitor per VGA chip > and cannot cope with 2 RAMDACs on one controller. ok then need to use pci cards. damn. -- mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Multi Head XFree86 VGA card recomendations wanted

1999-12-16 Thread Egervary Gergely
> I need to build some new Multi-Head FreeBSD machines > in my lab using XFree86 3.9.16. > > I want to know which VGA cards to buy > for Multi-Head (dual monitor) support. > > Currently I have 1 multi-head FreeBSD machine using > Matrox Millenium cards abd XFree86 3.9.16. > It works great, but y

silo overflows

1999-12-12 Thread Egervary Gergely
hy, i still can't get rid of silo overflows :( 3.3-STABLE, a simple pentium2 system w/ external 33.6 rockwell modem attached to sio0. i see nothing special. and the overflows just still come :( what should i check/ look after? --mauzi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "un

Re: cdrom speed adjustment ioctl

1999-12-06 Thread Egervary Gergely
> I've just hacked a new ioctl into the ATAPI cdrom driver, which > lets the user to specify (pronounce: ``slow down'' :) the speed > of todays' extremely high speed drives. ok, so i see you like the idea - so the question is: should we implement a new ioctl for it, or - as like scsi - should we

cdrom speed adjustment ioctl

1999-11-28 Thread Egervary Gergely
hello, I've just hacked a new ioctl into the ATAPI cdrom driver, which lets the user to specify (pronounce: ``slow down'' :) the speed of todays' extremely high speed drives. It's a documented ATAPI feature, and is very easy to implement, and I've found it very useful :) first, you need to add