Running out of memory and having to continually swap things in and out
of ram degrades performance, yes. Page faults are simply how the
virtual memory subsystem gets things done, like pulling things out of
swap.
--Doug
On Nov 7, 2007 7:48 PM, binto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw
>
> Even page f
On 11/6/07, binto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just wanna know,
> how to reduce the number of page faults to upgrade program or OS
> performance?
> is there any parameters that i must set if i reduce the number of page
> fault?
Don't forget that some amount of page faults are normal consequen
On 10/17/07, Doug Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you also send the output of ps -auxl?
> >
> > Also - do you notice this performance drop when running something like
> > one of the network performance tools? I'd like to isolate the disk
> >
>
> Can you also send the output of ps -auxl?
>
> Also - do you notice this performance drop when running something like
> one of the network performance tools? I'd like to isolate the disk
> activity from the network activity for a clean test..
>
I tested this with iperf, and while I did see some
Hi,
I have an new NFS server that is processing roughly 15mbit of NFS traffic
that we recently upgraded from an older 4.10 box. It has a 3-ware raid card,
and is serving NFS out a single em nic to LAN clients. The machine works
great just serving NFS, but when I try to copy data from one raid vo
Hi,
I have an new NFS server that is processing roughly 15mbit of NFS traffic
that we recently upgraded from an older 4.10 box. It has a 3-ware raid card,
and is serving NFS out a single em nic to LAN clients. The machine works
great just serving NFS, but when I try to copy data from one raid vo
6 matches
Mail list logo
