Re: Handling segV's

a list of reasons for a SIGSEGV ? thanks and regards, ramesh >From: Alec Kloss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dodge Ram) >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Handling segV's >Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 11:23:37 -0500 (CDT) > >Dodge Ram said: > >

Handling segV's

Hi, I am looking at ways to handle segV's gracefully without letting a process die. I am aware of the siglongjmp() call and don't know if that is the only way to handle segV's Any pointers on how to gracefully (?) handle segV and not letting the process die will be of great help

Sharing file descriptors

Hi, Have a question on whether it is possible to share file descriptors between two processes. The purpose is to have a stanby process take over when the primary process fails. The primary process creates/deletes socket connections at run time. Forking does not scale well when th

Sharing file descriptors

Hi, Have a question on whether it is possible to share file descriptors between two processes. The purpose is to have a stanby process take over when the primary process fails. The primary process creates/deletes socket connections at run time. Forking does not scale well when th

Sharing file descriptors

Hi, Have a question on whether it is possible to share file descriptors between two processes. The purpose is to have a stanby process take over when the primary process fails. The primary process creates/deletes socket connections at run time. Forking does not scale well when th

Sharing file descriptors

Hi, Have a question on whether it is possible to share file descriptors between two processes. The purpose is to have a stanby process take over when the primary process fails. The primary process creates/deletes socket connections at run time. Forking does not scale well when th