On 03/05/2011 04:02 AM, Eric Anderson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a moderately threaded userland program (all C) I am working on (using
pthreads, freebsd 8.1 64bit). It seems to leak memory (using standard
malloc/free) badly.
as opposed to what? OpenBSD? Linux? Windows? why do you think your proble
cam_event: 0x16
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x15
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x21
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x15
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x21
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x15
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x21
in messages.
Thanks in advance
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
ed up and has been up for > 2 months
now.
Deomid Ryabkov wrote:
ok, now that the machine has been up for 10 days, i am reasonably sure
i've close enough to this one.
back in january i cvsupped to -STABLE and the box (dual head opteron
box) started hanging.
and i mean it dies completel
ptions DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS
options DIAGNOSTIC
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
dowing
where:
ZZZ my ethernet IP address
YYY ip address of TCP peer
Thank you very much in advance,
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
this code
would be invoked with VLNK.
checking write permissions on a symlink? access(2)/eaccess(2) dereference
symlinks.
but if, for whatever reason, someone calls VOP_ACCESS on read-only
UFS filesystem, checking if writing to symlink itself is ok, it will be denied.
which makes sense.
--
Deomid R
block will need to be allocated, which would involve a change to block
map,
which is certainly not desirable for read-only mounts.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/vm-design/index.html)
article has to both -CURRENT and -STABLE?
Were there notable changes not mentioned in the article?
Is there a better document on FreeBSD's current VM?
Thanks.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PRO
chine's CPU.
I recall seeing similar behavior on a Sun V20z, running 5.x at the time.
I have definitely seen a lot of interrupts and CPU usage on the sio interrupt
corresponding to serial console. Needless to say there was no activity
on the console itself.
I think turning off serial console sol
Aditya Godbole wrote:
I want to build freebsd 4.10. I am running freebsd 6.0
I used jail for that, quite successfully.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Vitaliy Ovsyannikov wrote:
Hello, freebsd-hackers.
I've stuck with the unable to make watchdogs for daemons running via
startup rc-scripts. In linux we can just put the process in the
inittab. Does FreeBSD contains ability like this?
try sysutils/daemontools
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka
? Are there any implications?
Thanks in advance...
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-Feb-18 16:18:41 +0300, Deomid Ryabkov wrote:
I have a strange case of occasional refused connect()'s.
The system is running 4.10-STABLE.
...
The question is - why do connections get refused at all?
I can think of no valid reasons...
FWIW, I
guys, there is _source_ of the server at the end of my post!
there are no threads nor forks and backlog is set to 511 (Apache's
default value).
and client always waits for rrequst to complete before sending a new one.
Peter Edwards wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:18:41 +0300, Deomid Ry
efore that number of requests.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
$n: starting.\n";
for (my $i = 0; $i < $n; $i++) {
my $ua = LWP::UserAgent->new;
$ua->timeout(1000);
$req = HTTP::Request->new("GET" => $url);
$res = $ua->request($req);
print $i." ".$res->status_line."\n" if (0 or $res->code == 500);
}
exit();
- cut -
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
rt is obtaining the full pathname of the file (won't
bother with hardlinks at first, they aren't used here).
Could that be done with the FreeBSD's filesystem (vnode/vfs?) code?
(which I'm not familiar with)
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
ystem, but would it
possible to obtain a full path at that level?
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Ivan Voras wrote:
Deomid Ryabkov wrote:
This could be a custom filesystem wrapper for UFS that would report
name of the file/directory being changed.
Couldn't you use kqueue system to monitor the directory-file?
I could, if I hadn't near 10 millions of them.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Ro
make sense? Are there other solutions for this problem?
Distributed filesystems were considered, but we find them too heavy for
the purpose,
which is to keep a group of dumb, read-only mirrors in sync with the master.
--
Deomid Ryabkov aka Rojer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 8025844
21 matches
Mail list logo
