Hey, thanks a lot!! that was it
- Daniel
- Original Message
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Valencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Maximum data size
Daniel Valencia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I
Hi all,
I am trying to allow a program to use more than 512MB of memory (specifically a
little over 1GB), but I can't seem to be able to. I tried with ulimit -d
2097152, but when I check back again (immediately after setting it), it reads
"data seg size (kbytes, -d) 524288" (again).
Shouldn't it be actually enabled by default?... I think a user should be able
to get the insecure behaviour _only_ if he wants to...
- Daniel
- Original Message
From: Joerg Pernfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Satur
Actually, I would like to support this motion... Thinking over the possible
behaviours of -P is to sit in a room saying "to delete or not to delete..." If
you think it over from a higher perspective, "The UNIX Way" (TM) is to have
individual commands for specific tasks and to extract tasks from
disk in my system... If
there is anything I can do to help fix that problem
(like testing and such), please let me know...
- Daniel
--- Daniel Valencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well... Hopeful with your mailings, I updated the
> kernel (cvsup) and rebuilt it... t
Hi,
Well... Hopeful with your mailings, I updated the kernel (cvsup) and rebuilt
it... the problem's still there... detects one SATA disk (ad4) and crashes
before acknowledging the second (ad6)...
- Daniel
S�ren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Daniel Valencia wrote:
&g
Hi,
So, what's your last src/ cvsup date/time? is your machine dualcore? if so, are
you building using the SMP option?
mine breaks when in SMP mode... in GENERIC it works, just it doesn't detect the
second SATA disk.
- Daniel
S�ren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Danie
Hello,
I started a short thread a few weeks ago, pointing out a problem with my
dualcore athlon64, when detecting the second SATA disk (/dev/ad6)... my chipset
is an nForce4... The problem was narrowed down to a few commits performed at a
particular date and time. My questions are: is it safe
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2006 02:54,
Daniel Valencia wrote:
> OK... it's Jan. 25th, at 8:14am.
>
> there are a bunch of commits at 8:14:45 that relate to the ata drivers, and
> a couple at second 46 and 47... but that's it.
OK... it's Jan. 25th, at 8:14am.
there are a bunch of commits at 8:14:45 that relate to the ata drivers, and a
couple at second 46 and 47... but that's it.
Thanks,
- Daniel
Daniel Valencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've narrowed it down to Jan. 25th,
7:30am - 8:15am
I've narrowed it down to Jan. 25th, 7:30am - 8:15am
I'll try to narrow it down a little further
Thanks,
- Daniel
--- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 06 February 2006 23:50, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:50:35PM -0800
006 02:39, Daniel Valencia
> wrote:
> > I just noticed something... it actually boots well
> using SMP on
> > 6.0-RELEASE... the problem is when using the last
> STABLE src
>
> Any chance you could narrow it down using cvsup to
> do a binary search on the
> date as
I just noticed something... it actually boots well using SMP on 6.0-RELEASE...
the problem is when using the last STABLE src
Thanks,
- Daniel
Daniel Valencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello...
I've been trying to update my system in the STABLE branch, and every time
Hello...
I've been trying to update my system in the STABLE branch, and every time I
install the new kernel, built using SMP, the system won't boot... as I don't
know where the problem could be and it doesn't seem to have been fixed, I
thought it a good idea to let you guys know...
The boo
Hello
I just had to lock the mutex before waiting on the
condition... my problem is solved now.
Thank you very much for the tip.
Daniel
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__
Hello, everybody...
I have this multithreaded program, and there are these
two threads that work together with a queue. The
backend receive thread reads packets and pushes them
into the queue, while the frontend thread pops them
off the queue to hand them to the caller. This is an
implementation
16 matches
Mail list logo
